Alshami Abbas, Purewal Tiffany, Douedi Steven, Alazzawi Mohammed, Hossain Mohammad A, Ong Raquel, Sen Shuvendu, Cheng Jennifer, Patel Swapnil
Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ 07753, USA.
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ 07753, USA.
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 25;10(5):898. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050898.
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a well-known complication of diabetes mellitus with a significantly high mortality if not immediately and properly treated. Therefore, strategies for prevention of DKA are ever so important when managing diabetes mellitus, especially in the non-compliant patient population. Previously studies have suggested insulin pump use to carry an increased risk of DKA compared to insulin injections, while European studies suggest the opposite. We aimed to perform a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of DKA in insulin pump versus injection in the United States.
We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) 2017 database, which represents a 20% sample of all payer hospitalizations in the United States. These hospitalizations were systematically selected by the Agency for Healthcare Resources and Quality (AHRQ) and we included all type 1 diabetes mellitus patients over the age of 18 who were on insulin, either pump or injections, in our study.
We found a total of 58,260 admissions for patients with type 1 DM. Of these, 7850 had insulin pump, 30,672 used insulin injection, and 19,738 had no prior insulin use. We found that insulin pump use, compared to injections, failed to predict a lower incidence of DKA in hospitalized patients.
Although several studies from European countries have found a reduction of DKA risk with insulin pump use, in this study we found no clear significant difference in a United States-based study. While this may be possible due to different legislating and regulation organizations, further studies are warranted to further evaluate the benefit of either insulin dispensing modality.
糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是糖尿病一种广为人知的并发症,若不立即进行恰当治疗,死亡率会显著升高。因此,在管理糖尿病时,尤其是对于依从性差的患者群体,预防DKA的策略极其重要。此前的研究表明,与胰岛素注射相比,使用胰岛素泵会增加发生DKA的风险,而欧洲的研究结果则相反。我们旨在进行一项回顾性队列研究,以确定在美国使用胰岛素泵与注射胰岛素相比发生DKA的风险。
我们利用了2017年医疗成本和利用项目国家住院患者样本(HCUP-NIS)数据库,该数据库代表了美国所有支付方住院病例的20%样本。这些住院病例由医疗保健资源和质量局(AHRQ)系统选取,我们的研究纳入了所有年龄在18岁以上、正在使用胰岛素(胰岛素泵或注射)的1型糖尿病患者。
我们共发现1型糖尿病患者住院58260例。其中,7850例使用胰岛素泵,30672例使用胰岛素注射,19738例此前未使用过胰岛素。我们发现,与注射胰岛素相比,使用胰岛素泵并不能预测住院患者发生DKA的较低发生率。
尽管欧洲国家的多项研究发现使用胰岛素泵可降低DKA风险,但在本项基于美国的研究中,我们未发现明显的显著差异。虽然这可能是由于立法和监管机构不同所致,但仍有必要进行进一步研究,以进一步评估这两种胰岛素给药方式的益处。