Smith Craig, Goss Hannah R, Issartel Johann, Belton Sarahjane
School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, D09 NA55, Ireland.
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;8(3):176. doi: 10.3390/children8030176.
Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations are at greater risk of adopting unhealthy behaviours and developing chronic diseases. Adolescence has been identified as a crucial life stage to develop lifelong healthy behaviours, with schools often suggested as the ideal environment to foster healthy habits. Health literacy (HL) provides a possible solution to promote such healthy behaviours. The aim of this study was to review school-based HL-related interventions targeting socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents and to identify effective intervention strategies for this population. Searches were performed in six databases. Inclusion criteria included age: 12-16; the implementation of a school-based intervention related to HL aimed at socioeconomically disadvantaged populations; an intervention focused on: physical activity (PA), diet, mental health, substance abuse or sleep. Forty-one articles were included, with the majority focusing on PA and diet (n = 13), PA ( = 9) or mental health ( = 7). Few interventions focused solely on substance abuse ( = 2) or sleep ( = 1), and none targeted or assessed HL as an outcome measure. There was huge heterogeneity in study design, outcomes measures and effectiveness reported. Effective intervention strategies were identified that can be used to guide future interventions, including practical learning activities, peer support and approaches targeting the school environment, the parents or that link the intervention to the community.
社会经济地位不利的人群采取不健康行为和患慢性病的风险更高。青春期被认为是养成终身健康行为的关键生命阶段,学校通常被视为培养健康习惯的理想环境。健康素养(HL)为促进此类健康行为提供了一种可能的解决方案。本研究的目的是回顾针对社会经济地位不利青少年的以学校为基础的与健康素养相关的干预措施,并确定针对该人群的有效干预策略。在六个数据库中进行了检索。纳入标准包括年龄:12 - 16岁;实施针对社会经济地位不利人群的以学校为基础的与健康素养相关的干预措施;干预重点为:身体活动(PA)、饮食、心理健康、药物滥用或睡眠。纳入了41篇文章,其中大多数关注身体活动和饮食(n = 13)、身体活动(n = 9)或心理健康(n = 7)。很少有干预措施仅关注药物滥用(n = 2)或睡眠(n = 1),并且没有将健康素养作为结果指标进行针对性干预或评估。在研究设计、结果指标和报告的有效性方面存在巨大差异。确定了可用于指导未来干预的有效干预策略,包括实践学习活动、同伴支持以及针对学校环境、家长或使干预与社区相联系的方法。