Jovanovic R, Barone C M, Van Natta F C, Congema E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York.
J Reprod Med. 1988 Apr;33(4):347-52.
A study was undertaken to determine whether pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) resulting from the insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) could be eliminated by inserting the IUD during ovulation and administering prophylactic antibiotics to cover insertion. IUDs, 95% of which were Progestaserts, were inserted within two days of probable ovulation in 288 patients. These study patients were compared with a matched control group of 288 patients not using IUDs. None of the 288 IUD patients (totaling 619 woman-years of IUD use) developed PID after insertion, and only 0.5% per 100 woman-years developed PID later. The incidence of PID seen in these patients was less than that observed in the control group. It was also less than that in the general population or that following legal induced abortion. The expulsion rate of 1% per 100 woman-years in our patients is the lowest ever reported. It probably is related to the low motility of the uterus and expansion of the cervix during ovulation; the latter facilitates insertion during ovulation.
一项研究旨在确定通过在排卵期间插入宫内节育器(IUD)并给予预防性抗生素以覆盖插入过程,是否可以消除因插入IUD而导致的盆腔炎(PID)。在288例患者的可能排卵的两天内插入IUD,其中95%为含孕酮宫内节育器。将这些研究患者与288例未使用IUD的匹配对照组进行比较。288例IUD患者(IUD使用总计619妇女年)在插入后均未发生PID,每100妇女年仅有0.5%的患者后来发生PID。这些患者中观察到的PID发生率低于对照组。也低于一般人群或合法人工流产后的发生率。我们患者中每100妇女年1%的排出率是有史以来报道的最低水平。这可能与排卵期间子宫活动度低和宫颈扩张有关;后者便于在排卵期间插入。