School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):643-649. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210634. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Understanding patient experiences is crucial to evaluating care quality in EDs. However, while previous reviews describe the determinants of ED patient experiences (ie, factors that influence patient experiences), few have described actual patient experiences. The aim of this systematic mixed studies review was to describe patient experiences in the ED from the patient's perspective.
Embase, Medline, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched, with publication dates limited between 1 January 2001 and 16 September 2019. Studies describing adult patient experiences in the ED were included. Studies describing patient satisfaction, proxy-reported experiences or child/adolescent experiences were excluded. The quality of included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2018 version). An inductive, convergent qualitative synthesis of the extracted data was undertaken following Thomas and Harden's (2008) methods.
Fifty-four studies were included and of those, only five (9%) studies included a standardised definition of patient experience. Two inter-related themes emerged: ; and . The first theme included four subthemes regarding respect, communication, caring behaviours and optimising patient confidence. A key finding related to the potential for power imbalances between patients and their care providers. The second theme included two subthemes regarding physical aspects of the ED environment and patients' waiting experience. Patients attributed more importance to the waiting experience itself rather than the duration they had to wait.
Patients in the ED have unique and complex experiences. Greater research is needed to understand the relational and environmental factors that contribute to power imbalances between patients and care providers, how to support more positive waiting experiences, and developing a standardised definition of patient experience in the ED.
CRD42020150154.
了解患者体验对于评估急诊科的护理质量至关重要。然而,虽然之前的综述描述了急诊科患者体验的决定因素(即影响患者体验的因素),但很少有描述实际患者体验的综述。本系统混合研究综述的目的是从患者的角度描述急诊科的患者体验。
检索了 Embase、Medline、ProQuest 护理和联合健康、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引以及 Cochrane 图书馆电子数据库,出版日期限制在 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 16 日之间。纳入描述成年患者在急诊科的体验的研究。排除描述患者满意度、代理报告的体验或儿童/青少年体验的研究。使用混合方法评估工具(2018 年版)评估纳入研究的质量。根据托马斯和哈登(2008 年)的方法,对提取的数据进行了归纳、收敛的定性综合分析。
纳入了 54 项研究,其中只有 5 项(9%)研究包括了患者体验的标准化定义。出现了两个相互关联的主题:;和。第一个主题包括四个亚主题,涉及尊重、沟通、关爱行为和增强患者信心。一个关键发现与患者和他们的护理提供者之间潜在的权力失衡有关。第二个主题包括两个亚主题,涉及急诊科环境的物理方面和患者的等待体验。患者更重视等待体验本身,而不是他们不得不等待的时间。
急诊科的患者有独特而复杂的体验。需要进一步研究以了解导致患者和护理提供者之间权力失衡的关系和环境因素,如何支持更积极的等待体验,以及在急诊科中制定患者体验的标准化定义。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020150154。