Suppr超能文献

多中心回顾性队列研究中息肉切除术后结直肠癌风险:对 2020 年英国息肉切除术后监测指南的评估。

Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.

机构信息

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group (CSPRG), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group (CSPRG), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2307-2320. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323411. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Colonoscopy surveillance aims to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence after polypectomy. The 2020 UK guidelines recommend surveillance at 3 years for 'high-risk' patients with ≥2 premalignant polyps (PMPs), of which ≥1 is 'advanced' (serrated polyp (or adenoma) ≥10 mm or with (high-grade) dysplasia); ≥5 PMPs; or ≥1 non-pedunculated polyp ≥20 mm; 'low-risk' patients without these findings are instead encouraged to participate in population-based CRC screening. We examined the appropriateness of these risk classification criteria and recommendations.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent colonoscopy and polypectomy mostly between 2000 and 2010 at 17 UK hospitals, followed-up through 2017. We examined CRC incidence by baseline characteristics, risk group and number of surveillance visits using Cox regression, and compared incidence with that in the general population using standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).

RESULTS

Among 21 318 patients, 368 CRCs occurred during follow-up (median: 10.1 years). Baseline CRC risk factors included age ≥55 years, ≥2 PMPs, adenomas with tubulovillous/villous/unknown histology or high-grade dysplasia, proximal polyps and a baseline visit spanning 2-90 days. Compared with the general population, CRC incidence without surveillance was higher among those with adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (SIR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.42) or ≥2 PMPs, of which ≥1 was advanced (1.39, 1.09 to 1.75). For low-risk (71%) and high-risk (29%) patients, SIRs without surveillance were 0.75 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.88) and 1.30 (1.03 to 1.62), respectively; for high-risk patients after first surveillance, the SIR was 1.22 (0.91 to 1.60).

CONCLUSION

These guidelines accurately classify post-polypectomy patients into those at high risk, for whom one surveillance colonoscopy appears appropriate, and those at low risk who can be managed by non-invasive screening.

摘要

目的

结肠镜检查监测旨在降低息肉切除术后结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率。2020 年英国指南建议,对于有≥2 个癌前息肉(PMP)的“高危”患者,≥1 个是“高级别”(锯齿状息肉(或腺瘤)≥10mm 或有(高级别)异型增生);≥5 个 PMPs;或≥1 个无蒂息肉≥20mm;没有这些发现的“低危”患者则鼓励参加基于人群的 CRC 筛查。我们检查了这些风险分类标准和建议的适当性。

设计

对 17 家英国医院在 2000 年至 2010 年间进行的结肠镜检查和息肉切除术的患者进行回顾性分析,随访至 2017 年。我们使用 Cox 回归根据基线特征、风险组和随访次数检查 CRC 发病率,并使用标准化发病率比(SIR)比较发病率与一般人群的发病率。

结果

在 21318 名患者中,随访期间发生 368 例 CRC(中位数:10.1 年)。基线 CRC 危险因素包括年龄≥55 岁、≥2 个 PMP、管状绒毛/绒毛/未知组织学或高级别异型增生的腺瘤、近端息肉和跨越 2-90 天的基线就诊。与一般人群相比,无监测的高级别异型增生腺瘤(SIR 1.74,95%CI 1.21 至 2.42)或≥2 个 PMPs,其中≥1 个为高级别(SIR 1.39,1.09 至 1.75)患者的 CRC 发病率更高。对于低危(71%)和高危(29%)患者,无监测的 SIR 分别为 0.75(95%CI 0.63 至 0.88)和 1.30(1.03 至 1.62);高危患者首次监测后,SIR 为 1.22(0.91 至 1.60)。

结论

这些指南准确地将息肉切除术后患者分为高危患者,高危患者需要进行一次结肠镜检查监测,而低危患者可以通过非侵入性筛查进行管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f2f/8588296/d9ebd77f1c95/gutjnl-2020-323411f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验