Suppr超能文献

酮洛芬与布洛芬治疗类风湿关节炎患者疼痛的疗效比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparison of Efficacy of Ketoprofen and Ibuprofen in Treating Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Atzeni Fabiola, Masala Ignazio F, Bagnasco Michela, Lanata Luigi, Mantelli Flavio, Sarzi-Puttini Piercarlo

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Orthopedic Unit, Santissima Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):577-588. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00250-3. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or other rheumatic diseases say that pain and stiffness are symptoms affecting their quality of life. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen are the most commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to reduce inflammation and manage mild-to-moderate pain. The aim of this new systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare the clinical efficacy of ketoprofen and ibuprofen in patients with RA.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE scientific databases were systematically searched from their inception to November 2020 to identify RCTs directly comparing the recommended therapeutic doses of oral ketoprofen (50-200 mg/day) with ibuprofen (600-1800 mg/day) for RA pain relief. The meta-analysis was made using the standardized mean differences (SMD) of each of the identified RCTs using a fixed effects model.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 456 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in efficacy in favor of ketoprofen (0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.52, p = 0.0005) at all point-estimates of the mean-weighted size effect. The heterogeneity test for the efficacy outcome (the hypothesis was χ = 3.57%, df = 3, p value = 0.31 and the chance of a test effect was 3.49, p = 0.0005) was not significant, and this was confirmed by a Higgins percentage of 16%. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the two drugs in terms of tolerability or safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this meta-analysis shows that ketoprofen is more effective than ibuprofen in managing RA pain at therapeutic doses, thus supporting its use in clinical practice.

摘要

引言

类风湿关节炎(RA)或其他风湿性疾病患者表示,疼痛和僵硬是影响其生活质量的症状。酮洛芬和布洛芬是最常用的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),用于减轻炎症和处理轻至中度疼痛。这项新的文献系统综述和随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析旨在比较酮洛芬和布洛芬对RA患者的临床疗效。

方法

对MEDLINE和EMBASE科学数据库从创建至2020年11月进行系统检索,以确定将口服酮洛芬(50 - 200毫克/天)与布洛芬(600 - 1800毫克/天)的推荐治疗剂量直接比较用于缓解RA疼痛的随机对照试验。使用固定效应模型,对每个纳入的随机对照试验的标准化平均差(SMD)进行荟萃分析。

结果

四项涉及456名患者的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。荟萃分析结果显示,在平均加权效应大小的所有点估计值上,酮洛芬在疗效上具有统计学显著差异(0.33,95%置信区间0.14 - 0.52,p = 0.0005)。疗效结果的异质性检验(假设为χ = 3.57%,自由度 = 3,p值 = 0.31,检验效应的可能性为3.49,p = 0.0005)不显著,Higgins百分比为16%也证实了这一点。荟萃分析纳入的研究未显示两种药物在耐受性或安全性方面有任何显著差异。

结论

这项荟萃分析结果表明,在治疗剂量下,酮洛芬在管理RA疼痛方面比布洛芬更有效,从而支持其在临床实践中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5635/8119581/56fbdf01b40c/40122_2021_250_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验