Cox Natasha, Mallen Christian D, Scott Ian C
Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, High Lane, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.
BMC Med. 2025 Jan 29;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03870-0.
Pain is a major challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with many people suffering chronic pain. Current RA management guidelines focus on assessing and reducing disease activity using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Consequently, pain care is often suboptimal, with growing evidence that analgesics are widely prescribed to patients with RA, despite potential toxicities and limited evidence for efficacy. Our review provides an overview of pharmacological treatments for pain in patients with RA, summarising their efficacy and use.
Thirteen systematic reviews of drug efficacy for pain in patients with RA were included in this review. These showed moderate- to high-quality evidence from clinical trials in more contemporary time-periods (mainly 1990s/2000s for synthetic DMARDs and post-2000 for biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs) that, in patients with active RA, short-term glucocorticoids and synthetic, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have efficacy at reducing pain intensity relative to placebo. In contrast, they showed low-quality evidence from trials in more historical time-periods (mainly in the 1960s-1990s for opioids and paracetamol) that (aside from naproxen) analgesics/neuromodulators provide any improvements in pain relative to placebo, and no supportive evidence for gabapentinoids, or long-term opioids. Despite this evidence base, 21 studies of analgesic prescribing in patients with RA consistently showed substantial and sustained prescribing of analgesics, particularly opioids, with approximately one quarter and > 40% of patients receiving chronic opioid prescriptions in each year in England and North America, respectively. Whilst NSAID prescribing had fallen over time across countries, gabapentinoid prescribing in England had risen from < 1% of patients in 2004 to approximately 10% in 2020. Prescribing levels varied substantially between individual clinicians and groups of patients.
In patients with active RA, DMARDs have efficacy at reducing pain, supporting the role of treat-to-target strategies. Despite limited evidence that analgesics improve pain in patients with RA, these medicines are widely prescribed. The reasons for this are unclear. We consider that closing this evidence-to-practice gap requires qualitative research exploring the drivers of this practice, high-quality trials of analgesic efficacy in contemporary RA populations, alongside an increased focus on pain management (including pharmacological and non-pharmacological options) within RA guidelines.
疼痛是类风湿关节炎(RA)患者面临的一项重大挑战,许多患者遭受慢性疼痛折磨。当前的RA管理指南侧重于使用改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)评估和降低疾病活动度。因此,疼痛护理往往不尽如人意,越来越多的证据表明,尽管存在潜在毒性且疗效证据有限,但镇痛药仍被广泛开给RA患者。我们的综述概述了RA患者疼痛的药物治疗方法,总结了其疗效和使用情况。
本综述纳入了13项关于RA患者疼痛药物疗效的系统评价。这些评价显示,在更现代的时间段(合成DMARDs主要为20世纪90年代/21世纪初,生物/靶向合成DMARDs为2000年后)进行的临床试验提供了中到高质量的证据,表明在活动性RA患者中,短期糖皮质激素以及合成、生物和靶向合成DMARDs相对于安慰剂在减轻疼痛强度方面具有疗效。相比之下,在更久远时间段(阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚主要为20世纪60年代至90年代)进行的试验提供了低质量的证据,表明(除萘普生外)镇痛药/神经调节剂相对于安慰剂在改善疼痛方面没有任何效果,且没有加巴喷丁类药物或长期阿片类药物的支持性证据。尽管有这些证据基础,但21项关于RA患者镇痛药处方的研究一致表明,镇痛药,尤其是阿片类药物的处方量巨大且持续存在,在英格兰和北美,分别约有四分之一和超过40%的患者每年接受慢性阿片类药物处方。虽然各国非甾体抗炎药的处方量随时间有所下降,但英格兰加巴喷丁类药物的处方量已从2004年的不到1%的患者增加到2020年的约10%。个体临床医生和患者群体之间的处方水平差异很大。
在活动性RA患者中,DMARDs在减轻疼痛方面具有疗效,支持了达标治疗策略的作用。尽管镇痛药改善RA患者疼痛的证据有限,但这些药物仍被广泛处方。其原因尚不清楚。我们认为,要缩小这一证据与实践之间的差距,需要进行定性研究以探索这种做法的驱动因素,开展当代RA人群镇痛药疗效的高质量试验,并在RA指南中更加关注疼痛管理(包括药物和非药物选择)。