Hay Eleanor, Cullup Thomas, Barnicoat Angela
Department of Clinical Genetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Jan;37(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s00467-021-04995-z. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Rapid technological advances in genomic testing continue to increase our understanding of the genetic basis of a wide range of kidney disorders. Establishing a molecular diagnosis benefits the individual by bringing an end to what is often a protracted diagnostic odyssey, facilitates accurate reproductive counselling for families and, in the future, is likely to lead to the delivery of more targeted management and surveillance regimens. The selection of the most appropriate testing modality requires an understanding both of the technologies available and of the genetic architecture and heterogeneity of kidney disease. Whilst we are witnessing a far greater diagnostic yield with broader genetic testing, such approaches invariably generate variants of uncertain significance and secondary incidental findings, which are not only difficult to interpret but present ethical challenges with reporting and feeding back to patients and their families. Here, we review the spectrum of nephrogenetic disorders, consider the optimal approach to genetic testing, explore the clinical utility of obtaining a molecular diagnosis, reflect on the challenges of variant interpretation and look to the future of this dynamic field.
基因组检测技术的飞速发展不断增进我们对多种肾脏疾病遗传基础的理解。确立分子诊断对个体有益,因为它往往能终结漫长的诊断过程,为家庭提供准确的生殖咨询,并且在未来可能会带来更具针对性的管理和监测方案。选择最合适的检测方式需要了解现有的技术以及肾脏疾病的遗传结构和异质性。虽然我们通过更广泛的基因检测看到了更高的诊断率,但这些方法总是会产生意义不确定的变异和次要的偶然发现,这些不仅难以解释,而且在向患者及其家属报告和反馈时还会带来伦理挑战。在此,我们回顾肾脏发生障碍的范围,考虑基因检测的最佳方法,探讨获得分子诊断的临床效用,思考变异解读的挑战,并展望这个动态领域的未来。