• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村/城市老年人创伤性脑损伤康复出院差异。

Rural/urban differences in discharge from rehabilitation in older adults with traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1601-1608. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17065. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.17065
PMID:33675540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8192484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults and treatment of this population in nursing homes are increasing. The objective of this study is to examine differences in the quality of care and outcomes of older adults with TBI in rural and urban settings by (1) comparing the rates of successful community discharge; and (2) reasons for not achieving successful discharge among patients in rural and urban environments.

DESIGN

Retrospective national cohort study of skilled nursing facility (SNF) patients using Medicare inpatient claims linked with Minimum Data Set assessments. Demographic, health, and facility characteristics were compared between rural and urban settings using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression with state random effects was used to identify characteristics that predicted successful discharge.

SETTING

U.S. skilled nursing facilities (n = 11,771).

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older discharged to a SNF following hospitalization for TBI between 2011 and 2015 (n = 61,021).

MEASUREMENTS

Successful community discharge defined as discharge from SNF within 100 days of admission and remaining in the community for ≥30 days without dying or admission to an inpatient healthcare facility.

RESULTS

Unadjusted rates of successful discharge were significantly lower for patients in rural settings compared with patients in urban settings (52.1% vs 58.5%, p < 0.01). Patients in rural settings had lower adjusted odds (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.89) of successful discharge. Reasons for not discharging successfully differed between rural and urban settings with rural patients less likely to discharge from SNF within 100 days though also less likely to be rehospitalized within 30 days of SNF discharge.

CONCLUSION

Given the low overall rate of successful community discharge and worse outcomes among rural patients, further research to explore interventions to improve SNF care and discharge planning in this population is warranted.

摘要

背景/目的:老年人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的发生率以及疗养院中这一人群的治疗方法正在增加。本研究的目的是通过(1)比较农村和城市环境中 TBI 老年患者成功社区出院率;以及(2)比较农村和城市环境中患者无法成功出院的原因,来检查农村和城市环境中老年人 TBI 护理质量和结果的差异。

设计

这是一项利用医疗保险住院索赔与最低数据评估相联系,对熟练护理设施(SNF)患者进行的回顾性全国队列研究。使用描述性统计方法比较农村和城市环境中的人口统计学、健康和设施特征。使用州随机效应的逻辑回归来确定预测成功出院的特征。

地点

美国熟练护理设施(n=11771)。

参与者

2011 年至 2015 年期间因 TBI 住院后出院至 SNF 的年龄在 66 岁及以上的医疗保险受益人(n=61021)。

测量

成功的社区出院定义为在入院后 100 天内从 SNF 出院,并在社区中至少存活 30 天,没有死亡或入住住院医疗设施。

结果

与城市环境中的患者相比,农村环境中的患者未经调整的成功出院率明显较低(52.1%对 58.5%,p<0.01)。农村环境中的患者成功出院的调整后优势比(比值比 0.84,95%置信区间为 0.80-0.89)较低。农村和城市环境之间出院不成功的原因不同,农村患者在 100 天内从 SNF 出院的可能性较低,但 SNF 出院后 30 天内再次住院的可能性也较低。

结论

鉴于农村患者总体社区成功出院率较低,且预后较差,需要进一步研究探索改善这一人群 SNF 护理和出院计划的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Rural/urban differences in discharge from rehabilitation in older adults with traumatic brain injury.农村/城市老年人创伤性脑损伤康复出院差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jun;69(6):1601-1608. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17065. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Postacute Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Older US Adults.评估美国老年人在康复期护理的城乡利用差异和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18738.
3
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Positive Beliefs and the Likelihood of Successful Community Discharge From Skilled Nursing Facilities.积极信念与从熟练护理设施成功社区出院的可能性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar;102(3):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.375. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Successful Community Discharge Among Older Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury in Skilled Nursing Facilities.在熟练护理机构中,老年创伤性脑损伤患者的成功社区出院。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E186-E198. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000638.
6
Effects of Postacute Settings on Readmission Rates and Reasons for Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.急性后期环境对全膝关节置换术后再入院率及再入院原因的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e1-367.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.068. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Skilled Nursing Facility Patients Discharged to Home Health Agency Services Spend More Days at Home.熟练护理机构患者出院至家庭健康机构服务可在家中多停留几天。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1573-1578. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16457. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
8
Successful Discharge to Community Gap of FFS Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without ADRD Narrowed.有和没有 ADRD 的 FFS 医疗保险受益人成功出院到社区的差距缩小了。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):972-978. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16965. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
Outcomes of post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities in Medicare beneficiaries with and without a diagnosis of dementia.在 Medicare 受益人群中,患有和不患有痴呆症的患者在熟练护理设施中的康复护理结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2899-2907. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17321. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Home Health Care After Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Following Heart Failure Hospitalization.心力衰竭住院后出院到专业护理机构后的家庭保健。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):96-102. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16179. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward More Holistic Early Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Care: Recommendations from the 2024 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Classification and Nomenclature Initiative Psychosocial and Environmental Modifiers Working Group.迈向更全面的早期创伤性脑损伤评估与护理:2024年美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所创伤性脑损伤分类与命名倡议心理社会和环境修饰因素工作组的建议
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jul;42(13-14):1023-1037. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0569. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Correlations Between County-Level Social Determinants of Health and Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Mortality in the United States.美国县级健康社会决定因素与创伤性脑损伤相关死亡率之间的相关性
Neurotrauma Rep. 2025 Jan 20;6(1):32-38. doi: 10.1089/neur.2024.0100. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Postacute Care Utilization and Outcomes Among Older US Adults.评估美国老年人在康复期护理的城乡利用差异和结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918738. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18738.
2
Do report cards predict future quality? The case of skilled nursing facilities.绩效报告能否预测未来质量?以熟练护理设施为例。
J Health Econ. 2019 Jul;66:208-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 24.
3
Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Home- and Community-Based Services and Supports: Stakeholder Perspectives From 14 States.
Use of computer simulation to identify effects on hospital census with reduction of transfers for non-procedural patients in community hospitals.运用计算机模拟技术,确定在社区医院减少非手术患者转院对医院入住率的影响。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 25;13(2):e002652. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002652.
4
Reducing risks in complex care transitions in rural areas: a grounded theory.农村地区复杂的医疗转院服务中的风险降低:扎根理论。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2185964. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2185964.
5
Care patterns and predictors of community residence among older patients after hospital discharge for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者出院后社区居住的护理模式和预测因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1806-1818. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18308. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
A Scoping Literature Review of Rural Institutional Elder Care.农村机构养老的范围文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 19;19(16):10319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610319.
7
Challenges and opportunities in diagnosing and managing mild traumatic brain injury in rural settings.农村地区轻度创伤性脑损伤诊断和管理的挑战与机遇。
Rural Remote Health. 2022 Jun;22(2):7241. doi: 10.22605/RRH7241. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
Fewer potentially avoidable health care events in rural veterans with self-directed care versus other personal care services.与其他个人护理服务相比,农村退伍军人中自我管理护理的潜在可避免医疗保健事件更少。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17656. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
农村-城市地区在获得家庭和社区服务与支持方面的差距:来自 14 个州的利益相关者观点。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):503-508.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Geographical Disparity and Traumatic Brain Injury in America: Rural Areas Suffer Poorer Outcomes.美国的地域差异与创伤性脑损伤:农村地区的预后较差。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):10-15. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_310_18.
5
Outcomes in nursing home patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的疗养院患者的治疗结果。
Surgery. 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.02.023.
6
Development and Validation of the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set 3.0 Mortality Risk Score (MRS3).养老院最低数据集 3.0 死亡率风险评分(MRS3)的制定和验证。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jan 16;74(2):219-225. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly044.
7
Use of post-acute care after hospital discharge in urban and rural hospitals.城乡医院出院后急性后期护理的使用情况。
Am J Accountable Care. 2017 Mar;5(1):16-22. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Living with traumatic brain injury in a rural setting: supports and barriers across the continuum of care.农村地区创伤性脑损伤患者的生活:连续护理过程中的支持与障碍
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(20):2071-2080. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1217081. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2017, SNF Value-Based Purchasing Program, SNF Quality Reporting Program, and SNF Payment Models Research. Final rule.医疗保险计划;2017财年熟练护理设施的前瞻性支付系统与合并计费、熟练护理设施基于价值的采购计划、熟练护理设施质量报告计划以及熟练护理设施支付模式研究。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Aug 5;81(151):51969-2053.
10
A cross-sectional study on health differences between rural and non-rural U.S. counties using the County Health Rankings.一项利用县卫生排名对美国农村和非农村县之间健康差异的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 1;15:441. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1053-3.