• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《罗马尼亚残疾儿童和成人照顾者的金斯顿照顾者压力量表的心理测量特性》。

Psychometric properties of the Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale in Romanian caregivers of children and adults with disabilities.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Psychology, University of Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2021 May;112:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103921. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103921
PMID:33676087
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale (KCSS) was designed to measure stress in caregivers of people with dementia, but empirical studies have used this instrument to measure stress in caregivers of children and adults with disabilities, without investigating its psychometric properties.

AIMS

This study analysed the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the KCSS in Romanian caregivers of children and adults with disabilities.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A total of 276 familial caregivers of children and adults with various disabilities completed measures of caregiver stress and related concepts. After 3 months, 72 participants were retested.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

A new bifactorial model with eight items was compared against the originally proposed trifactorial model and a previously proposed bifactorial model with 10 items. The bifactorial eight-item model had the best fit indices (χ2 = 41.4, df = 19, p = .002, CFI = .981, TLI = .971, RMSEA = .065 [90 % CI = .038, .092]), along with good test-retest reliability and convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The KCSS is a reliable instrument for assessing caregiver stress among caregivers of children and adults with disabilities. Implications, limitations, and future research suggestions are discussed.

摘要

背景

Kingston 照顾者压力量表(KCSS)旨在测量痴呆症患者照顾者的压力,但实证研究已经使用该工具来测量儿童和成年残疾照顾者的压力,而没有调查其心理测量特性。

目的

本研究分析了 KCSS 在罗马尼亚残疾儿童和成人照顾者中的结构、信度和效度。

方法和程序

共有 276 名有各种残疾的儿童和成人的家庭照顾者完成了照顾者压力和相关概念的测量。3 个月后,72 名参与者接受了重测。

结果和结论

一个新的包含 8 个项目的双因素模型与最初提出的三因素模型和以前提出的包含 10 个项目的双因素模型进行了比较。双因素八项目模型具有最佳的拟合指数(χ2=41.4,df=19,p=0.002,CFI=0.981,TLI=0.971,RMSEA=0.065 [90% CI=0.038,0.092]),同时具有良好的重测信度以及焦虑和抑郁的收敛、发散和预测效度。

结论和意义

KCSS 是评估残疾儿童和成人照顾者压力的可靠工具。讨论了其意义、局限性和未来研究建议。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale in Romanian caregivers of children and adults with disabilities.《罗马尼亚残疾儿童和成人照顾者的金斯顿照顾者压力量表的心理测量特性》。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 May;112:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103921. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale.金斯敦照顾者压力量表的心理测量评估。
Clin Gerontol. 2017 Jul-Sep;40(4):268-280. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1313349. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
The Chinese version of the Caregiver Difficulties Scale: Psychometric evaluation.《照顾者困难量表》中文版:心理计量学评估。
Child Care Health Dev. 2023 Jul;49(4):769-777. doi: 10.1111/cch.13093. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Development and psychometric properties of a scale assessing the needs of caregivers of children with disabilities.评估残疾儿童照顾者需求量表的编制及心理测量学特性
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jul;8(3):414-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
Development and validation of caregiver stress and support scale for caregivers of individuals with disabilities in Singapore.开发和验证新加坡残疾人士照顾者压力和支持量表。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(26):8450-8462. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2012604. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
The adult carer quality of life questionnaire (AC-QoL): comparison with measures of burden and well-being, and Italian validation.成人照顾者生活质量问卷(AC-QoL):与负担和幸福感测量的比较,以及意大利验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1207-1216. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1423519. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Validity and reliability of the caregiver contribution to self-care of heart failure index.照顾者对心力衰竭自我护理贡献量表的效度和信度。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):245-55. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318256385e.
9
The Development of Two New Computer Adaptive Tests To Evaluate Feelings of Loss in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feelings of Loss-Self and Feelings of Loss-Person With Traumatic Brain Injury.开发两个新的计算机自适应测试来评估创伤性脑损伤患者照顾者的失落感:TBI-CareQOL 失落感-自我和创伤性脑损伤患者的失落感-人。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4S):S31-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire. caregiver-centered communication questionnaire 的信度和效度测试
J Nurs Meas. 2023 Sep 1;31(3):439-447. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0044. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the concept of caregiver role strain in informal caregivers: an approach according to Meleis.非正式照料者中照料者角色压力概念的分析:基于梅莱斯的一种方法。
Rev Cuid. 2025 Apr 30;16(1):e4000. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.4000. eCollection 2025 Jan-Apr.
2
The virtual family conference in stroke rehabilitation: Education, preparation, and transition planning.脑卒中康复中的虚拟家庭会议:教育、准备和过渡计划。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Aug;37(8):1099-1110. doi: 10.1177/02692155221146448. Epub 2022 Dec 27.