• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视护理专业学生的学业成果:一项四十年的系统综述与荟萃分析。

Examining nursing student academic outcomes: A forty-year systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Caponnetto Valeria, Dante Angelo, Masotta Vittorio, La Cerra Carmen, Petrucci Cristina, Alfes Celeste Marie, Lancia Loreto

机构信息

Department of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Edificio Delta 6 - Via San Salvatore, 67010 Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy; Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.

Department of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Edificio Delta 6 - Via San Salvatore, 67010 Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104823. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104823
PMID:33676348
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the definitions of nursing students' academic outcomes and provide a quantitative synthesis of their associated and predictive factors.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Four scientific databases were searched until January 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

Observational studies describing undergraduate nursing students' academic outcomes were included. Studies were analytically synthesized and meta-analyses were performed utilizing the Odds Ratio or Cohen's d as effect sizes.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, published from 1979 to 2018, were included in the review, nine were meta-analyzed. Studies involved 10,024 undergraduate nursing students and were mostly retrospective cohort (55.6%). Students were mostly female (75.4%) with a mean age ranging from 21.3 to 27.0 years. Meta-analysis revealed that being female (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.12), having attended a Classical, Scientific or Academic high school (OR = 1.30, 95% IC = 1.16 to 1.46), and having reported higher final grades at the upper-secondary high school (Cohen's d = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.65) was significantly associated with student's ability to graduate within the regular duration of the program. Sensitivity analyses confirmed meta-analytic results and meta-analyses heterogeneity depended on study design. Contrasting and limited evidence were found for other investigated factors, and for academic outcomes different from graduation within the regular duration of the program.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite meta-analytic results, gender and upper-secondary school would be unethical students' entry selection criteria. Final upper-secondary school grades should be considered for this scope and purpose. Conflicting and limited evidence found for other factors, such as students' background, suggested the influence of local contexts on the phenomenon and its investigation. Investigating the role of modifiable individual variables, such as empathy and critical thinking, could contribute to the open debate about students' entry selection strategies. An improvement in methodological quality of future studies is recommended and expected.

摘要

目的

综合护理专业学生学业成果的定义,并对其相关因素和预测因素进行定量综合分析。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

检索了四个科学数据库,直至2020年1月。

综述方法

纳入描述本科护理专业学生学业成果的观察性研究。对研究进行分析性综合,并以优势比或科恩d值作为效应量进行荟萃分析。

结果

该综述纳入了1979年至2018年发表的18项研究,其中9项进行了荟萃分析。研究涉及10024名本科护理专业学生,大多为回顾性队列研究(55.6%)。学生大多为女性(75.4%),平均年龄在21.3至27.0岁之间。荟萃分析显示,女性(优势比=1.65,95%置信区间=1.26至2.12)、上过古典、科学或学术高中(优势比=1.30,95%置信区间=1.16至1.46)以及在高中阶段报告的期末成绩较高(科恩d值=0.42,95%置信区间=0.18至0.65)与学生在课程规定时间内毕业的能力显著相关。敏感性分析证实了荟萃分析结果,荟萃分析的异质性取决于研究设计。对于其他调查因素以及与课程规定时间内毕业不同的学业成果,发现了相互矛盾且有限的证据。

结论

尽管有荟萃分析结果,但性别和高中情况作为学生入学选拔标准是不道德的。在此范围内和目的下,应考虑高中期末成绩。对于其他因素,如学生背景,发现了相互矛盾且有限的证据,这表明当地背景对该现象及其研究有影响。研究可改变的个体变量,如同理心和批判性思维的作用,可能有助于关于学生入学选拔策略的公开辩论。建议并期望未来研究的方法质量有所提高。

相似文献

1
Examining nursing student academic outcomes: A forty-year systematic review and meta-analysis.审视护理专业学生的学业成果:一项四十年的系统综述与荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104823. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
7
Antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for occupational HIV exposure.职业性HIV暴露后的抗逆转录病毒暴露后预防(PEP)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD002835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002835.pub3.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian nursing students' learning self-efficacy instrument.波斯语版护理专业学生学习自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331435. eCollection 2025.
2
Causes and outcomes of at-risk underperforming pharmacy students: implications for policy and practice.高危表现不佳药学学生的原因和结果:对政策和实践的启示。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05327-z.
3
Factors Associated With Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic and Clinical Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study.
与本科护理专业学生学业及临床成绩相关的因素:一项混合方法研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 16;9:793591. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.793591. eCollection 2022.
4
Detailed data about a forty-year systematic review and meta-analysis on nursing student academic outcomes.关于护理专业学生学业成绩的40年系统评价与荟萃分析的详细数据。
Data Brief. 2021 Aug 14;38:107298. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107298. eCollection 2021 Oct.