Department of Clinical Research, Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Psychiatric University Hospital, University Function, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03122-4.
A major challenge to psychological treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is patient non-compliance. A promising new treatment approach that is hypothesized to increase patient compliance is blended treatment, consisting of face-to-face contact with a therapist combined with modules delivered over the internet within the same protocol. While this treatment concept has been developed and proven effective for a variety of mental disorders, it has not yet been examined for AUD.
The study described in this protocol aims to examine and evaluate patient compliance with blended AUD treatment as well as the clinical and cost effectiveness of such treatment compared to face-to-face treatment only.
The study design is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. The included outpatient institutions (planned number of patients: n = 1800) will be randomized in clusters to implement either blended AUD treatment or face-to-face treatment only, i.e. treatment as usual (TAU). Both treatment approaches consist of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy. Data on sociodemographics, treatment (e.g. intensity, duration), type of treatment conclusion (compliance vs. dropout), alcohol consumption, addiction severity, consequences of drinking, and quality of life, will be collected at treatment entry, at treatment conclusion, and 6 months after treatment conclusion. The primary outcome is compliance at treatment conclusion, and the secondary outcomes include alcohol consumption and quality of life at six-months follow-up. Data will be analyzed with an Intention-to-treat approach by means of generalized linear mixed models with a random effect for cluster and fixed effect for each step. Also, analyses evaluating cost-effectiveness will be conducted.
Blended treatment may increase treatment compliance and thus improve treatment outcomes due to increased flexibility of the treatment course. Since this study is conducted within an implementation framework it can easily be scaled up, and when successful, blended treatment has the potential to become an alternative offer in many outpatient clinics nationwide and internationally.
Clinicaltrials.gov .: NCT04535258 , retrospectively registered 01.09.20.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)心理治疗的一个主要挑战是患者不依从。一种有前途的新治疗方法,即混合治疗,假设可以提高患者的依从性,它包括与治疗师进行面对面的接触,以及在同一方案中通过互联网提供模块。虽然这种治疗概念已经针对各种精神障碍进行了开发和证明有效,但尚未针对 AUD 进行检查。
本方案中描述的研究旨在检查和评估混合 AUD 治疗的患者依从性,以及与仅面对面治疗相比,这种治疗的临床和成本效益。
研究设计是一项实用的、阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验。将纳入的门诊机构(计划患者人数:n=1800)按集群随机分组,实施混合 AUD 治疗或仅面对面治疗,即常规治疗(TAU)。两种治疗方法都包括动机访谈和认知行为疗法。在治疗开始时、治疗结束时和治疗结束后 6 个月,将收集社会人口统计学数据、治疗(如强度、持续时间)、治疗结论类型(依从与脱落)、饮酒量、成瘾严重程度、饮酒后果和生活质量的数据。主要结局是治疗结束时的依从性,次要结局包括治疗结束后 6 个月的饮酒量和生活质量。将采用广义线性混合模型进行意向治疗分析,模型中包含一个集群的随机效应和每个步骤的固定效应。还将进行评估成本效益的分析。
混合治疗由于治疗过程的灵活性增加,可能会提高治疗依从性,从而改善治疗结果。由于这项研究是在实施框架内进行的,因此可以很容易地扩大规模,并且当成功时,混合治疗有可能成为全国和国际上许多门诊诊所的替代选择。
Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04535258,于 2020 年 9 月 1 日回顾性注册。