Suppr超能文献

综合医疗与常规医疗在全科医疗中治疗抑郁症状和障碍的比较[综合医疗研究]:一项非劣效性随机试验的研究方案

Blended care vs. usual care in the treatment of depressive symptoms and disorders in general practice [BLENDING]: study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized trial.

作者信息

Massoudi Btissame, Blanker Marco H, van Valen Evelien, Wouters Hans, Bockting Claudi L H, Burger Huibert

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1376-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with depressive disorders are treated by general practitioners (GPs) and are prescribed antidepressant medication. Patients prefer psychological treatments but they are under-used, mainly due to time constraints and limited accessibility. A promising approach to deliver psychological treatment is blended care, i.e. guided online treatment. However, the cost-effectiveness of blended care formatted as an online psychological treatment supported by the patients' own GP or general practice mental health worker (MHW) in routine primary care is unknown. We aim to demonstrate non-inferiority of blended care compared with usual care in patients with depressive symptoms or a depressive disorder in general practice. Additionally, we will explore the real-time course over the day of emotions and affect, and events within individuals during treatment.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic non-inferiority trial including 300 patients with depressive symptoms, recruited by collaborating GPs and MHWs. After inclusion, participants are randomized to either blended care or usual care in routine general practice. Blended care consists of the 'Act and Feel' treatment: an eight-week web-based program based on behavioral activation with integrated monitoring of depressive symptomatology and automatized feedback. GPs or their MHWs coach the participants through regular face-to-face or telephonic consultations with at least three sessions. Depressive symptomatology, health status, functional impairment, treatment satisfaction, daily activities and resource use are assessed during a follow-up period of 12 months. During treatment, real-time fluctuations in emotions and affect, and daily events will be rated using ecological momentary assessment. The primary outcome is the reduction of depressive symptoms from baseline to three months follow-up. We will conduct intention-to-treat analyses and supplementary per-protocol analyses.

DISCUSSION

This trial will show whether blended care might be an appropriate treatment strategy for patients with depressive symptoms and depressive disorder in general practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register: NTR4757; 25 August 2014. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4757 . (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6mnXNMGef ).

摘要

背景

大多数抑郁症患者由全科医生(GP)进行治疗并开具抗抑郁药物。患者更倾向于心理治疗,但心理治疗的使用不足,主要原因是时间限制和可及性有限。一种有前景的心理治疗方式是混合式照护,即在线指导治疗。然而,在常规初级保健中,由患者自己的全科医生或全科医疗心理健康工作者(MHW)支持的在线心理治疗形式的混合式照护的成本效益尚不清楚。我们旨在证明在全科医疗中,混合式照护与常规照护相比,对有抑郁症状或抑郁症的患者而言不存在劣势。此外,我们将探索一天中情绪和情感的实时变化过程,以及治疗期间个体内部发生的事件。

方法

这是一项实用的非劣效性试验,纳入了300名有抑郁症状的患者,由合作的全科医生和心理健康工作者招募。纳入后,参与者在常规全科医疗中被随机分配到混合式照护组或常规照护组。混合式照护包括“行动与感受”治疗:一个基于行为激活的为期八周的网络项目,对抑郁症状进行综合监测并提供自动反馈。全科医生或其心理健康工作者通过定期面对面或电话咨询(至少三次)指导参与者。在12个月的随访期内评估抑郁症状、健康状况、功能损害、治疗满意度、日常活动和资源使用情况。在治疗期间,使用生态瞬时评估对情绪和情感的实时波动以及日常事件进行评分。主要结局是从基线到三个月随访时抑郁症状的减轻。我们将进行意向性分析和补充的符合方案分析。

讨论

这项试验将表明混合式照护是否可能是全科医疗中有抑郁症状和抑郁症患者的一种合适治疗策略。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册库:NTR4757;2014年8月25日。http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4757 。(由WebCite®存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6mnXNMGef

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ba/5470276/cadf81e71b70/12888_2017_1376_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验