Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1002A, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Diretoria de Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde Do DF, Brasília, DF, 70390-125, Brazil.
Malar J. 2021 Mar 6;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03668-4.
Cross-border malaria is a major barrier to elimination efforts. Along the Venezuela-Brazil-Guyana border, intense human mobility fueled primarily by a humanitarian crisis and illegal gold mining activities has increased the occurrence of cross-border cases in Brazil. Roraima, a Brazilian state situated between Venezuela and Guyana, bears the greatest burden. This study analyses the current cross-border malaria epidemiology in Northern Brazil between the years 2007 and 2018.
De-identified data on reported malaria cases in Brazil were obtained from the Malaria Epidemiological Surveillance Information System for the years 2007 to 2018. Pearson's Chi-Square test of differences was utilized to assess differences between characteristics of cross-border cases originating from Venezuela and Guyana, and between border and transnational cases. A logistic regression model was used to predict imported status of cases.
Cross-border cases from Venezuela and Guyana made up the majority of border and transnational cases since 2012, and Roraima remained the largest receiving state for cross-border cases over this period. There were significant differences in the profiles of border and transnational cases originating from Venezuela and Guyana, including type of movement and nationality of patients. Logistic regression results demonstrated Venezuelan and Guyanese nationals, Brazilian miners, males, and individuals of working age had heightened odds of being an imported case. Furthermore, Venezuelan citizens had heightened odds of seeking care in municipalities adjacent Venezuela, rather than transnational municipalities.
Cross-border malaria contributes to the malaria burden at the Venezuela-Guyana-Brazil border. The identification of distinct profiles of case importation provides evidence on the need to strengthen surveillance at border areas, and to deploy tailored strategies that recognize different mobility routes, such as the movement of refuge-seeking individuals and of Brazilians working in mining.
跨境疟疾是消除疟疾工作的主要障碍。在委内瑞拉-巴西-圭亚那边境,主要由人道主义危机和非法采金活动驱动的人员大规模跨境流动,导致巴西的跨境疟疾病例增加。巴西的罗赖马州位于委内瑞拉和圭亚那之间,承受着最大的负担。本研究分析了 2007 年至 2018 年期间巴西北部跨境疟疾的流行病学情况。
从 2007 年至 2018 年的疟疾流行病学监测信息系统中获取巴西报告疟疾病例的匿名数据。采用 Pearson 卡方检验差异,评估源自委内瑞拉和圭亚那的跨境病例特征之间的差异,以及边境和跨国病例之间的差异。使用逻辑回归模型预测输入病例的输入状态。
自 2012 年以来,源自委内瑞拉和圭亚那的跨境病例构成了边境和跨国病例的大多数,在此期间,罗赖马州仍然是接收跨境病例最多的州。源自委内瑞拉和圭亚那的边境和跨国病例的特征存在显著差异,包括流动类型和患者国籍。逻辑回归结果表明,委内瑞拉和圭亚那国民、巴西矿工、男性和劳动年龄人口输入病例的可能性更高。此外,委内瑞拉公民更有可能前往与委内瑞拉接壤的城镇寻求医疗服务,而不是跨国城镇。
跨境疟疾增加了委内瑞拉-圭亚那-巴西边境的疟疾负担。输入病例特征的确定为加强边境地区监测以及部署针对不同流动路线的定制策略提供了证据,例如寻求庇护者和在采矿业工作的巴西人的流动。