• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国一般老年人群 EQ-5D-5L 参考值。

EQ-5D-5L reference values for the German general elderly population.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 6;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01719-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-021-01719-7
PMID:33676523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reference values are a helpful tool to facilitate comparisons of sampled values against a specified reference population. The aim is to describe the health profile and to provide visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and utility reference values for the EQ-5D-5L from a normative sample of the general elderly population (65+) in Germany.

METHODS

We analysed a sub-set of data from the German EQ-5D-5L valuation study using self-reported information based on EQ-5D-5L. We examined the share of respondents in each severity level per dimension as well as means, standard deviations (SD) and 95% confidence intervals for the index and EQ VAS values stratified by age groups and gender. Age was categorised in four groups (65-69, 70-74, 75-79 and > 79 years) to facilitate a more detailed examination of age-related health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

The average index and EQ VAS scores were 0.84 (SD 0.22) and 73.2 (SD 18.5), respectively. In total, 21.4% reported no problems in all dimensions. With higher age, health problems were reported more frequently, which, in turn, lead to monotonically decreasing index and EQ VAS values. Overall, men reported fewer problems than women and this difference was largest beyond the age of 80.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL in the oldest old appears to be less stable and differs from the young elderly. However, the conventional age categorisation of earlier population norms studies seems to mask these differences. Hence, the more detailed provision of EQ-5D-5L reference values for the elderly population seems helpful for future German studies.

摘要

背景

参考值是一种有用的工具,可以方便地将采样值与指定的参考人群进行比较。其目的是描述健康状况,并为德国一般老年人群(65 岁以上)的规范样本提供 EQ-5D-5L 的视觉模拟量表(EQ VAS)和效用参考值。

方法

我们使用基于 EQ-5D-5L 的自我报告信息,分析了德国 EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的一个子数据集。我们检查了每个维度每个严重程度级别的受访者比例,以及按年龄组和性别分层的指数和 EQ VAS 值的平均值、标准差(SD)和 95%置信区间。年龄分为四组(65-69 岁、70-74 岁、75-79 岁和>79 岁),以更详细地检查与年龄相关的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

结果

平均指数和 EQ VAS 评分为 0.84(SD 0.22)和 73.2(SD 18.5)。共有 21.4%的人在所有维度上均无问题。随着年龄的增长,健康问题的报告更为频繁,这反过来又导致指数和 EQ VAS 值呈单调下降。总体而言,男性报告的问题比女性少,而且这种差异在 80 岁以上的人群中最大。

结论

在最年长的老年人中,HRQoL 似乎不太稳定,与年轻的老年人不同。然而,早期人群规范研究的常规年龄分类似乎掩盖了这些差异。因此,为老年人群提供更详细的 EQ-5D-5L 参考值对未来的德国研究似乎很有帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d783/7937199/7d18c79dd46d/12955_2021_1719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d783/7937199/7d18c79dd46d/12955_2021_1719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d783/7937199/7d18c79dd46d/12955_2021_1719_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
EQ-5D-5L reference values for the German general elderly population.德国一般老年人群 EQ-5D-5L 参考值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 6;19(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01719-7.
2
Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set.采用 EQ-5D-5L 量表测量的健康相关生活质量:基于代表性德国人群样本和效价设定的规范指数值估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):933-944. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
3
EQ-5D-5L Bulgarian population norms.EQ-5D-5L 保加利亚人群常模。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1169-1178. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01225-5. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
5
EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China.中国城市人群 EQ-5D-5L 量表中国常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Nov 8;16(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1036-2.
6
EQ-5D-5L Slovenian population norms.EQ-5D-5L 斯洛文尼亚人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01584-w.
7
Population norms of health-related quality of life in Moscow, Russia: the EQ-5D-5L-based survey.俄罗斯莫斯科健康相关生活质量的人口常模:基于 EQ-5D-5L 的调查。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):831-840. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02705-0. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.美国 EQ-5D-5L 人群正常值及面对面和在线样本正常值比较。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):803-816. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02650-y. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Health-related quality of life among Indian population: The EQ-5D population norms for India.印度人群的健康相关生活质量:印度 EQ-5D 人群正常值。
J Glob Health. 2023 Feb 17;13:04018. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04018.
10
New Zealand Population Norms for the EQ-5D-5L Constructed From the Personal Value Sets of Participants in a National Survey.新西兰人口 EQ-5D-5L 构建的人群正常值:全国调查中参与者的个人价值观集。
Value Health. 2021 Sep;24(9):1308-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1280. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
User groups of inpatient multidisciplinary therapies for Parkinson's disease in Germany: a bicenter prospective observational study.德国帕金森病住院多学科治疗的用户群体:一项双中心前瞻性观察研究。
Neurol Res Pract. 2025 Jul 28;7(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s42466-025-00409-9.
2
Psychometric properties of the ICECAP-SCM capability-wellbeing measure in specialist palliative care units in Austria.奥地利专科姑息治疗病房中ICECAP-SCM能力-幸福感测量工具的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04032-8.
3
Determinant Factors of Stress in Caregivers of Patients With Schizophrenia: Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples.美国 EQ-5D-5L 人群正常值及面对面和在线样本正常值比较。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):803-816. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02650-y. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
EQ-5D-3L health status and health state utilities of the oldest-old (85 +) in Germany: results from the AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study.德国最年长人群(85 岁及以上)的 EQ-5D-3L 健康状况和健康状态效用:AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe 研究结果。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3223-3232. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02597-0. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
精神分裂症患者照料者压力的决定因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 3;9:e70648. doi: 10.2196/70648.
4
"Real world" medical care of patients with Fabry disease by primary care physicians, internists or general practitioners.初级保健医生、内科医生或全科医生对法布里病患者的“真实世界”医疗护理。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2025 Apr 30;15(2):350-361. doi: 10.21037/cdt-24-483. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
5
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic osteoporosis screening using chest radiographs with deep learning in Germany.在德国使用深度学习胸部X光片进行机会性骨质疏松症筛查的成本效益
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 13;37(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03048-x.
6
Explanatory factors for the survival benefit among hip and knee arthroplasty patients with osteoarthritis.骨关节炎患者行髋膝关节置换术后生存获益的解释性因素。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2025 Feb 22;7(2):100587. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100587. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Effect of impairment on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: association of functional systems and EQ-5D-5L index values in a cross-sectional study.多发性硬化症患者功能损害对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究中功能系统与EQ-5D-5L指数值的关联
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun;34(6):1773-1781. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03928-9. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
8
Population norms for the EQ-5D-5L for Hungary: comparison of online surveys and computer assisted personal interviews.匈牙利EQ-5D-5L量表的人群常模:在线调查与计算机辅助个人访谈的比较
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01755-2.
9
Cognitive recovery of post critical care patients with and without COVID-19: differences and similarities, an observational study.患有和未患有新冠肺炎的危重症后患者的认知恢复:差异与相似性,一项观察性研究
Neurol Res Pract. 2024 Oct 22;6(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s42466-024-00349-w.
10
Health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L and its determinants among Chinese adults.采用 EQ-5D-5L 评估的中国成年人健康相关生活质量及其决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 11;12:1383781. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383781. eCollection 2024.
哪些多属性效用仪器推荐用于成本效用分析?国家卫生技术评估(HTA)指南的回顾。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Nov;21(8):1245-1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Quebec Health-Related Quality-of-Life Population Norms Using the EQ-5D-5L: Decomposition by Sociodemographic Data and Health Problems.魁北克健康相关生活质量人群规范使用 EQ-5D-5L:按社会人口学数据和健康问题进行分解。
Value Health. 2020 Feb;23(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
5
Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.健康相关干预措施经济评价中的能力量表:文献的比较综述。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1433-1464. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02393-5. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
EQ-5D-5L population norms and health inequalities for Trinidad and Tobago.特立尼达和多巴哥的 EQ-5D-5L 人群正常值和健康不平等。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0214283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214283. eCollection 2019.
7
Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set.采用 EQ-5D-5L 量表测量的健康相关生活质量:基于代表性德国人群样本和效价设定的规范指数值估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):933-944. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
8
Future Directions in Valuing Benefits for Estimating QALYs: Is Time Up for the EQ-5D?未来衡量效益以估算 QALY 值的方向:时间是否已到 EQ-5D 发挥作用的时候了?
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.001.
9
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Comparing the EQ-5D-5L utility index based on value sets of different countries: impact on the interpretation of clinical study results.基于不同国家价值集比较EQ-5D-5L效用指数:对临床研究结果解释的影响
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4067-9.