School of Psychology, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Institute of Medical Psychology, University of Munich, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 May 14;155:107820. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107820. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Pure alexia and prosopagnosia traditionally have been seen as prime examples of dissociated, category-specific agnosias affecting reading and face recognition, respectively. More recent accounts have moved towards domain-independent explanations that postulate potential cross-links between different types of visual agnosia. According to one proposal, abnormal crowding, i.e. the impairment of recognition when features of adjacent objects are positioned too closely to each other, might provide a unified account for the perceptual deficits experienced by an agnosic patient. An alternative approach is based on the notion of complementary visual subsystems favouring the processing of abstract categories and specific exemplars, respectively. To test predictions of these two approaches with regard to pure alexia and prosopagnosia, we present previously unpublished data on digit recognition and visual crowding from two in the neuropsychological literature extensively studied patients, KD and MT (e.g., Campbell et al., 1986; Landis and Regard, 1988; Rentschler et al., 1994). Patient MT, diagnosed with pure alexia, showed pronounced abnormal foveal crowding, whereas KD, diagnosed with prosopagnosia, did not. These results form a distinct double dissociation with the performance of the two patients in other perceptual classification tasks involving Gabor micropatterns and textures, as well as Glass patterns, which revealed a significantly greater impairment in KD relative to MT. Based on an analysis of the specific task demands we argue that prosopagnosia and pure alexia may involve complementary deficits in instantiation and abstraction, respectively, during perceptual classification, beyond any category specificity. Such an explanation appears in line with previous distinctions between a predominantly left-hemispheric, abstract-category and a predominantly right-hemispheric, specific-exemplar subsystem underlying object recognition.
传统上,纯粹失读症和面孔失认症被视为分别影响阅读和面孔识别的分离、特定范畴的失认症的典型范例。最近的研究则倾向于提出潜在的跨类型视觉失认症之间的联系的非特定领域的解释。根据一种提议,异常拥挤,即当相邻物体的特征彼此之间的位置过于接近时导致的识别受损,可能为患有失认症的患者所经历的知觉缺陷提供一个统一的解释。另一种方法基于互补视觉子系统的概念,分别有利于抽象类别和特定范例的处理。为了用纯粹失读症和面孔失认症来检验这两种方法的预测,我们提出了来自神经心理学文献中两个广泛研究的患者(即 KD 和 MT)的数字识别和视觉拥挤的先前未发表的数据(例如,Campbell 等人,1986 年;Landis 和 Regard,1988 年;Rentschler 等人,1994 年)。被诊断为纯粹失读症的患者 MT 表现出明显的异常中心拥挤,而被诊断为面孔失认症的患者 KD 则没有。这些结果与这两个患者在涉及 Gabor 微图案和纹理以及 Glass 图案的其他感知分类任务中的表现形成了明显的双重分离,这表明 KD 相对于 MT 存在明显更大的损害。基于对特定任务需求的分析,我们认为在感知分类中,除了任何特定范畴的特异性之外,纯粹失读症和面孔失认症可能分别涉及实例化和抽象的互补缺陷。这种解释与先前在对象识别中左半球主要的抽象类别和右半球主要的特定范例子系统之间的区别一致。