Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Endourol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1490-1497. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0067. Epub 2021 May 20.
We aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. Medical records of 730 patients who underwent RARC between April 2007 and May 2019 in 11 tertiary referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with RFS, CSS, and OS. Among 591 patients, neobladder diversion was performed more frequently in the ICUD group (70.8% 52.5%, = 0.001). The median follow-up duration was shorter in the ICUD group than in the ECUD group (16 26 months, < 0.001). The rates of overall recurrence (36.5% 25.5%, = 0.013) and pelvic recurrence (12.1% 5.9%, = 0.031) were higher in the ECUD group. However, no differences in 5-year RFS (43.2% 58.4%, = 0.516), CSS (79.3% 89.7%, = 0.392), and OS (74.3% 81.4%, = 0.411) were noted between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that when compared to ICUD, ECUD was not associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; = 0.920), CSS (HR, 0.568; = 0.126), and OS (HR, 0.642; = 0.124). Although there was a difference in recurrence rate between the two groups, multivariable analysis indicated that the diversion technique after RARC did not affect the oncologic outcomes. Large prospective studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to verify the oncologic outcomes of ICUD and ECUD following RARC.
我们旨在比较膀胱癌患者行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)后行腔内尿流改道术(ICUD)与腔外尿流改道术(ECUD)的肿瘤学结果。回顾性分析了 2007 年 4 月至 2019 年 5 月在 11 个三级转诊中心接受 RARC 的 730 例患者的病历。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估两组患者的无复发生存率(RFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。在 591 例患者中,ICUD 组行新膀胱尿流改道术的频率更高(70.8% 比 52.5%,=0.001)。ICUD 组的中位随访时间短于 ECUD 组(16 比 26 个月,<0.001)。ECUD 组的总体复发率(36.5% 比 25.5%,=0.013)和盆腔复发率(12.1% 比 5.9%,=0.031)较高。然而,两组患者的 5 年 RFS(43.2% 比 58.4%,=0.516)、CSS(79.3% 比 89.7%,=0.392)和 OS(74.3% 比 81.4%,=0.411)差异无统计学意义。多变量分析显示,与 ICUD 相比,ECUD 与 RFS(风险比[HR],0.982;=0.920)、CSS(HR,0.568;=0.126)和 OS(HR,0.642;=0.124)无关。尽管两组患者的复发率存在差异,但多变量分析表明,RARC 后尿流改道术的技术并不影响肿瘤学结果。需要进行大型前瞻性研究,进行长期随访,以验证 RARC 后 ICUD 和 ECUD 的肿瘤学结果。