McCaul Michael, Young Taryn, Clarke Mike
Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;11(1):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
(new) guideline development methods are well described and supported by numerous examples, including comprehensive checklists. However, alternative guideline development methods, which draw from existing up to date, high quality clinical practice guidelines instead of re-inventing the wheel, have not been adopted so readily, despite the potential efficiencies of such methods compared to development. In Africa, guideline quality and rigour of development, especially for prehospital care, remains poor. This paper firstly describes the opinions of international guideline experts on the African Federation for Emergency Medicine guideline project, and secondly updates a framework for South African prehospital guideline development.
We conducted a qualitative study of expert reviews of an evidence-based guideline development project led by the African Federation for Emergency Medicine in 2016 for prehospital care in South Africa. We purposefully sampled key international and regional guideline experts from a range of organisations. Comments and voice memos, following a terms of reference guide, were thematically analysed through manual coding.
A total of seven experts gave feedback. Key themes revolved around existing international clinical practice guidelines not being enough to cover context specific evidence, blurring of guideline responsibilities and output, and transparency of guideline decisions and conflicts of interest. We showcase three fit-for-purpose guideline development approaches and provide an updated alternative guideline development roadmap for low-resource settings.
In order to create clinical practice guidelines that clinicians trust and use on a daily basis to change lives, guideline developers need rigorous yet pragmatic approaches that are responsive to end-user needs. Reflecting on the African Federation for Emergency Medicine prehospital guideline development project in 2016, this paper presents key guiding themes to strengthen guideline development in low- and middle-income countries and other low-resource settings and provides an updated hybrid guideline development approach.
(新的)指南制定方法已有详尽描述并有众多实例支持,包括全面的清单。然而,借鉴现有最新、高质量临床实践指南而非另起炉灶的替代指南制定方法,尽管与从头开发相比可能具有效率优势,但尚未得到广泛采用。在非洲,指南质量和制定的严谨性,尤其是针对院前急救的指南,仍然很差。本文首先描述国际指南专家对非洲急诊医学联合会指南项目的看法,其次更新南非院前指南制定的框架。
我们对非洲急诊医学联合会于2016年牵头开展的一项针对南非院前急救的循证指南制定项目进行了专家评审的定性研究。我们从一系列组织中有目的地抽取了关键的国际和地区指南专家。根据一份职权范围指南,对评论和语音备忘录进行手动编码的主题分析。
共有七位专家给出了反馈。关键主题围绕现有国际临床实践指南不足以涵盖特定背景证据、指南职责和产出的模糊性,以及指南决策的透明度和利益冲突。我们展示了三种适用的指南制定方法,并为资源匮乏地区提供了更新的替代指南制定路线图。
为了创建临床医生信任并日常使用以改变生活的临床实践指南,指南制定者需要严谨而务实的方法,以满足最终用户的需求。通过反思2016年非洲急诊医学联合会院前指南制定项目,本文提出了加强低收入和中等收入国家及其他资源匮乏地区指南制定的关键指导主题,并提供了更新的混合指南制定方法。