Suppr超能文献

γ-干扰素释放试验在非结核分枝杆菌病诊断中的应用性能:一项 2011 至 2019 年的回顾性调查。

Performance of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Diseases-A Retrospective Survey From 2011 to 2019.

机构信息

Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;10:571230. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.571230. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

There is an urgent need for precise diagnosis to distinguish nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases from pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and other respiratory diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs), including antigen-specific peripheral blood-based quantitative T cell assay (T-SPOT.TB) and QuantiFERON-TB-Gold-Test (QFT-G), in differentiating NTM infections ( = 1,407) from culture-confirmed PTB ( = 1,828) and other respiratory diseases ( = 2,652). At specie level, 2.56%, 10.73%, and 16.49% of NTM-infected patients were infected by , , and with - complex (MAC), respectively. Valid analyses of T-SPOT.TB (ESAT-6, CFP-10) and QFT-G were available for 37.03% and 85.79% in NTM-infected patients, including zero and 100% (36/36) of infection, 21.85% (33/151) and 92.05% (139/151) of infection, and 17.67% (41/232) and 91.24% (211/232) of MAC infection. Based on means comparisons and further ROC analysis, T-SPOT.TB and QFT-G performed moderate accuracy when discriminating NTM from PTB at modified cut-off values (ESAT-6 < 4 SFCs, CFP-10 < 3 SFCs, and QFT-G < 0.667 IU/ml), with corresponding AUC values of 0.7560, 0.7699, and 0.856. At species level of NTM, QFT-G effectively distinguished between MAC (AUC=0.8778), (AUC=0.8834) or (AUC=0.8783) than T-SPOT.TB. No significant differences in discriminatory power of these three IGRA tools were observed when differentiating NTM and Controls. Our results demonstrated that T-SPOT.TB and QFT-G were both efficient methods for differentiating NTM disease from PTB, and QFT-G possessed sufficient discriminatory power to distinguish infections by different NTM species.

摘要

目前迫切需要精确诊断,以区分非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)疾病与肺结核(PTB)和其他呼吸道疾病。本研究旨在评估干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)释放试验(IGRAs),包括基于外周血的抗原特异性定量 T 细胞检测(T-SPOT.TB)和 QuantiFERON-TB-Gold-Test(QFT-G),在区分 NTM 感染(=1407)与培养证实的 PTB(=1828)和其他呼吸道疾病(=2652)方面的诊断性能。在种水平上,分别有 2.56%、10.73%和 16.49%的 NTM 感染患者感染了、和复合群(MAC)。在 NTM 感染患者中,T-SPOT.TB(ESAT-6、CFP-10)和 QFT-G 的有效分析分别为 37.03%和 85.79%,包括 0%和 100%(36/36)的感染、21.85%(33/151)和 92.05%(139/151)的感染以及 17.67%(41/232)和 91.24%(211/232)的 MAC 感染。基于均值比较和进一步的 ROC 分析,当使用修改后的截断值(ESAT-6<4SFCs、CFP-10<3SFCs 和 QFT-G<0.667IU/ml)区分 NTM 与 PTB 时,T-SPOT.TB 和 QFT-G 具有中等准确性,相应的 AUC 值分别为 0.7560、0.7699 和 0.856。在 NTM 的种水平上,QFT-G 有效地区分了 MAC(AUC=0.8778)、(AUC=0.8834)或(AUC=0.8783)。与 T-SPOT.TB 相比,这些三种 IGRAs 工具在区分 NTM 和对照时,其鉴别能力没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,T-SPOT.TB 和 QFT-G 都是区分 NTM 疾病与 PTB 的有效方法,而 QFT-G 具有足够的鉴别力来区分不同 NTM 种的感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f03/7930076/2ec8a2a2bd9d/fcimb-10-571230-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验