Suppr超能文献

CANPT评分:一种预测入院时重症COVID-19的工具。

CANPT Score: A Tool to Predict Severe COVID-19 on Admission.

作者信息

Chen Yuanyuan, Zhou Xiaolin, Yan Huadong, Huang Huihong, Li Shengjun, Jiang Zicheng, Zhao Jun, Meng Zhongji

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.

Institute of Biomedical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 18;8:608107. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.608107. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a mortality rate higher than 50%. The purpose of this study was to establish a model for the prediction of the risk of severe disease and/or death in patients with COVID-19 on admission. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in four hospitals in China from January 22, 2020 to April 15, 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic, laboratory, and clinical data of the patients with COVID-19 were collected. The independent risk factors related to the severity of and death due to COVID-19 were identified with a multivariate logistic regression; a nomogram and prediction model were established. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and predictive accuracy were used to evaluate the model's effectiveness. In total, 582 patients with COVID-19, including 116 patients with severe disease, were enrolled. Their comorbidities, body temperature, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet (PLT) count, and levels of total bilirubin (Tbil), creatinine (Cr), creatine kinase (CK), and albumin (Alb) were independent risk factors for severe disease. A nomogram was generated based on these eight variables with a predictive accuracy of 85.9% and an AUROC of 0.858 (95% CI, 0.823-0.893). Based on the nomogram, the CANPT score was established with cut-off values of 12 and 16. The percentages of patients with severe disease in the groups with CANPT scores <12, ≥12, and <16, and ≥16 were 4.15, 27.43, and 69.64%, respectively. Seventeen patients died. NLR, Cr, CK, and Alb were independent risk factors for mortality, and the CAN score was established to predict mortality. With a cut-off value of 15, the predictive accuracy was 97.4%, and the AUROC was 0.903 (95% CI 0.832, 0.974). The CANPT and CAN scores can predict the risk of severe disease and mortality in COVID-19 patients on admission.

摘要

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)危重症患者的死亡率高于50%。本研究的目的是建立一个模型,用于预测COVID-19患者入院时发生重症和/或死亡的风险。对2020年1月22日至2020年4月15日在中国四家医院确诊为COVID-19的患者进行回顾性纳入研究。收集COVID-19患者的人口统计学、实验室和临床数据。通过多因素逻辑回归确定与COVID-19严重程度和死亡相关的独立危险因素;建立列线图和预测模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和预测准确性来评估模型的有效性。共纳入582例COVID-19患者,其中116例为重症患者。他们的合并症、体温、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板(PLT)计数以及总胆红素(Tbil)、肌酐(Cr)、肌酸激酶(CK)和白蛋白(Alb)水平是重症的独立危险因素。基于这八个变量生成了列线图,预测准确性为85.9%,AUROC为0.858(95%CI,0.823 - 0.893)。基于列线图,建立了CANPT评分,截断值为12和16。CANPT评分<12、≥12且<16以及≥16组的重症患者百分比分别为4.15%、27.43%和69.64%。17例患者死亡。NLR、Cr、CK和Alb是死亡的独立危险因素,并建立了CAN评分来预测死亡率。截断值为15时,预测准确性为97.4%,AUROC为0.903(95%CI 0.832,0.974)。CANPT和CAN评分可以预测COVID-19患者入院时发生重症和死亡的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/879f/7930838/4761c631bb50/fmed-08-608107-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
CANPT Score: A Tool to Predict Severe COVID-19 on Admission.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 18;8:608107. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.608107. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictive role of clinical features in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 for severe disease.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 May 28;45(5):536-541. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2020.200384.
3
Prediction of severe illness due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of initial Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio and Platelet count.
Platelets. 2020 Jul 3;31(5):674-679. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1760230. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
6
[Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on 28-day mortality of patients with severe pneumonia].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jul;31(7):827-831. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.07.006.
10
[Logistic regression analysis of death risk factors of patients with severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 and their predictive value].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 May;32(5):544-547. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200507-00364.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the ALKA and CRS scores to predict outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in United Arab Emirates.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1553189. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553189. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcome prediction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Comparison of the performance of five severity scores.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;10:1121465. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1121465. eCollection 2023.
3
Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;38(4):355-372. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00973-x. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
4
COVID-19 associated liver injury: A general review with special consideration of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes.
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 14;28(42):6017-6033. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i42.6017.
5
Association Between the rs11385942 Polymorphism and COVID-19 Severity in Colombian Population.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 20;9:910098. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.910098. eCollection 2022.
6
A multiparametric score for assessing the individual risk of severe Covid-19 among patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103909. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103909. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
General Severity of Illness Scoring Systems and COVID-19 Mortality Predictions: Is "Old Still Gold?".
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):416-418. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24197.
9
The COVID-19 Assessment for Survival at Admission (CASA) Index: A 12 Months Observational Study.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 30;8:719976. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.719976. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunomodulation for Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: The State of the Art.
Front Immunol. 2020 Nov 9;11:577442. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577442. eCollection 2020.
2
Single-Cell Sequencing of Peripheral Mononuclear Cells Reveals Distinct Immune Response Landscapes of COVID-19 and Influenza Patients.
Immunity. 2020 Sep 15;53(3):685-696.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
3
Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: The Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies.
Front Immunol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1708. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01708. eCollection 2020.
4
Statistical issues in the development of COVID-19 prediction models.
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):624-625. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26390. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Immune complement and coagulation dysfunction in adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1609-1615. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1021-2. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Liver damage at admission is an independent prognostic factor for COVID-19.
J Dig Dis. 2020 Sep;21(9):512-518. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12925.
8
Diagnostic performance of initial blood urea nitrogen combined with D-dimer levels for predicting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Sep;56(3):106110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106110. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
COVID-19 prediction models should adhere to methodological and reporting standards.
Eur Respir J. 2020 Sep 10;56(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02643-2020. Print 2020 Sep.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验