• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病严重程度通用评分系统与新冠病毒疾病死亡率预测：“老方法仍可靠吗？”

General Severity of Illness Scoring Systems and COVID-19 Mortality Predictions: Is "Old Still Gold?".

作者信息

Siddiqui Suhail S, Patnaik Rohit, Kulkarni Atul P

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):416-418. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24197.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24197
PMID:35656037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067503/
Abstract

Siddiqui SS, Patnaik R, Kulkarni AP. General Severity of Illness Scoring Systems and COVID-19 Mortality Predictions: Is "Old Still Gold?" Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):416-418.

摘要

西迪基·S·S、帕特纳伊克·R、库尔卡尼·A·P。疾病严重程度通用评分系统与新冠病毒疾病-19死亡率预测：“旧的依然是金标准吗？”《印度重症监护医学杂志》2022年；26(4):416 - 418。

相似文献

1
General Severity of Illness Scoring Systems and COVID-19 Mortality Predictions: Is "Old Still Gold?".疾病严重程度通用评分系统与新冠病毒疾病死亡率预测：“老方法仍可靠吗？”
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):416-418. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24197.
2
Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients.四种评分系统的评估与验证：急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV（APACHE IV）、序贯器官衰竭评估（SAPS III）、第二代多器官功能不全评分（MPM0 II）以及危重症癌症患者综合评分（ICMM）
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(4):263-269. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23407.
3
Ideal Severity of Illness Scoring System for Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Dream.重症癌症患者理想的疾病严重程度评分系统：一个梦想。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(4):215. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23405.
4
Airway Management and Related Procedures in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Position Statement of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.危重症COVID-19患者的气道管理及相关操作：印度重症医学学会立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;24(8):630-642. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23471.
5
Compass in COVID-19 Illness: Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy Scoring in Predicting Severity.新冠疾病中的指南针：弥散性血管内凝血/脓毒症诱导的凝血病评分在预测严重程度方面的作用
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec;25(12):1333-1334. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24061.
6
Acute Kidney Injury in the Critically Ill: Herein Lies the Problem!危重症患者的急性肾损伤：问题就在这里！
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(Suppl 3):S83. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23413.
7
Landmark Papers on Blood and Component Transfusion Therapy in the Critically Ill: A Critical Analysis.危重症患者血液及成分输血治疗的里程碑式文献：批判性分析
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;23(Suppl 3):S207-S211. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23254.
8
Author Response to the Letter to Editor "Reckoning the Inhaled Sedation in Critically Ill Patients: INSTINCT I".作者对致编辑的信《评估危重症患者的吸入镇静：INSTINCT I》的回复
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov;26(11):1229. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24360.
9
Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S104-S216. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24677. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
10
Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Acute Kidney Injury in the Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者急性肾损伤的流行病学与发病机制
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(Suppl 3):S84-S89. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23394.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and New Early Warning Signs Scores Estimate Mortality of COVID-19 Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、快速序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II以及新早期预警评分对入住重症监护病房的COVID-19患者死亡率的预测价值
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):464-471. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24170.
2
Dynamic APACHE II Score to Predict the Outcome of Intensive Care Unit Patients.动态急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II预测重症监护病房患者的预后
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;8:744907. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.744907. eCollection 2021.
3
Machine Learning Based Prediction of COVID-19 Mortality Suggests Repositioning of Anticancer Drug for Treating Severe Cases.基于机器学习的新冠肺炎死亡率预测表明可重新定位抗癌药物用于治疗重症病例。
Artif Intell Life Sci. 2021 Dec;1:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100020. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
CANPT Score: A Tool to Predict Severe COVID-19 on Admission.CANPT评分：一种预测入院时重症COVID-19的工具。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 18;8:608107. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.608107. eCollection 2021.
5
Prediction models for covid-19 outcomes.新冠病毒（COVID-19）结局预测模型。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3777.
6
Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score.利用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行风险分层：4C 死亡率评分的制定和验证。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3339.
7
Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.开发和验证一种临床风险评分，以预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生危重症的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033.
8
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1--interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems.危重病患者的严重程度评分：第 1 部分——预后评分系统的解读和准确性。
Chest. 2012 Jan;141(1):245-252. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0330.
10
Use of daily Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores to predict individual patient survival rate.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;22(9):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199409000-00008.