• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分散式中心辐射模型在联邦合格健康中心治疗丙型肝炎病毒的效果。

Effectiveness of a Decentralized Hub and Spoke Model for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

机构信息

Laura Rodriguez Research InstituteFamily Health Centers of San DiegoSan DiegoCA.

Institute of Public HealthSan Diego State University Research FoundationSan DiegoCA.

出版信息

Hepatol Commun. 2020 Dec 21;5(3):412-423. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1617. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/hep4.1617
PMID:33681676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7917265/
Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of cirrhosis, liver cancer, and mortality in the United States. We assessed the effectiveness of decentralized HCV treatment delivered by nurse practitioners (NPs), primary care physicians (PMDs), or an infectious disease physician (ID MD) using direct-acting antivirals in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in urban San Diego, CA. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,261 patients who received treatment from six NPs, 10 PMDs, and one ID MD practicing in 10 clinics between January 2014 and January 2020. Care was delivered based on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) model with one hub and nine spokes. HCV was deemed cured if a patient had a sustained virologic response (SVR) after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12). We evaluated differences in the prevalence of cure between provider types and hub or spoke status using Poisson regression. Patients were 34% Latino, 16% black, 63% were aged >50 years, and 59% were homeless; 53% had advanced fibrosis, 69% had genotype 1, and 5% were coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. A total of 943 patients achieved SVR12 (96% per protocol and 73% intention to treat). Even after adjustment for demographics, resources, and disease characteristics, the prevalence of cure did not differ between the ID MD and PMDs (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.04) or NPs (PR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.96-1.05). Similarly, there were no differences between the hub and spokes (PR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98-1.04). Among a low-income and majority homeless cohort of patients at urban FQHC clinics, HCV treatment administered by nonspecialist providers was not inferior to that provided by a specialist.

摘要

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)是导致美国肝硬化、肝癌和死亡的主要原因。我们评估了在加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市的一家联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC)中,使用直接作用抗病毒药物由护士从业者(NP)、初级保健医生(PMD)或传染病医生(ID MD)进行分散式 HCV 治疗的效果。我们对 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在 10 个诊所工作的 6 名 NP、10 名 PMD 和 1 名 ID MD 治疗的 1261 名患者进行了横断面分析。护理是根据社区医疗保健成果扩展(Project ECHO)模型提供的,该模型有一个中心和九个分支。如果患者在治疗 12 周后出现持续病毒学应答(SVR),则认为 HCV 已治愈(SVR12)。我们使用泊松回归评估了提供者类型和中心或分支状态之间治愈率的差异。患者中 34%为拉丁裔,16%为黑人,63%年龄>50 岁,59%无家可归;53%有晚期纤维化,69%为基因型 1,5%合并感染人类免疫缺陷病毒。共有 943 名患者达到 SVR12(96%按方案和 73%意向治疗)。即使在调整人口统计学、资源和疾病特征后,ID MD 和 PMD(患病率比 [PR],1.00;95%置信区间 [CI],0.95-1.04)或 NP(PR,1.01;95%CI,0.96-1.05)之间的治愈率差异无统计学意义。同样,中心和分支之间也没有差异(PR,1.01;95%CI,0.98-1.04)。在城市 FQHC 诊所的低收入和多数无家可归患者群体中,非专家提供者提供的 HCV 治疗并不逊于专家提供的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/a36bcb537fc2/HEP4-5-412-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/7afdc0388c6d/HEP4-5-412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/5947d6a052e0/HEP4-5-412-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/a36bcb537fc2/HEP4-5-412-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/7afdc0388c6d/HEP4-5-412-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/5947d6a052e0/HEP4-5-412-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db4b/7917265/a36bcb537fc2/HEP4-5-412-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Decentralized Hub and Spoke Model for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in a Federally Qualified Health Center.分散式中心辐射模型在联邦合格健康中心治疗丙型肝炎病毒的效果。
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Dec 21;5(3):412-423. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1617. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of All-Oral Antiviral Regimens in 996 Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1-Coinfected Patients Treated in Routine Practice.在常规治疗中,996 例人类免疫缺陷病毒/丙型肝炎病毒基因型 1 合并感染患者采用全口服抗病毒治疗方案的疗效。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1711-1720. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix111.
3
Expansion of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection by Task Shifting to Community-Based Nonspecialist Providers: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.通过任务转移至社区非专科医疗人员扩大丙型肝炎病毒感染治疗:一项非随机临床试验
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):311-318. doi: 10.7326/M17-0118. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
High hepatitis C cure rates among black and nonblack human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults in an urban center.城市中心感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的黑人和非黑人成年人中丙型肝炎的高治愈率
Hepatology. 2017 Nov;66(5):1402-1412. doi: 10.1002/hep.29308. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Hepatitis C virus testing, liver disease assessment and direct-acting antiviral treatment uptake and outcomes in a service for people who are homeless in Sydney, Australia: The LiveRLife homelessness study.在澳大利亚悉尼的一个为无家可归者服务的机构中进行丙型肝炎病毒检测、肝病评估以及直接作用抗病毒治疗的接受情况和结果:LiveRLife 无家可归者研究。
J Viral Hepat. 2019 Aug;26(8):969-979. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13112. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
Liver function following hepatitis C virus eradication by direct acting antivirals in patients with liver cirrhosis: data from the PITER cohort.直接作用抗病毒药物清除丙型肝炎病毒后肝硬化患者的肝功能:来自 PITER 队列的数据。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;21(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06053-3.
7
Providing Hepatitis C Treatment Locally for Substance-Using Patients.为药物使用患者提供本地的丙型肝炎治疗。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231186355. doi: 10.1177/21501319231186355.
8
Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection: Experience at a Single Center in Korea.韩国某单一中心丙型肝炎病毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒合并感染患者的临床特征和治疗结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 29;36(46):e308. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e308.
9
All-oral Direct-acting Antiviral Regimens in HIV/Hepatitis C Virus-coinfected Patients With Cirrhosis Are Efficient and Safe: Real-life Results From the Prospective ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH Cohort.肝硬化合并 HIV/丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的全口服直接作用抗病毒治疗方案有效且安全:前瞻性 ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH 队列的真实结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):763-770. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw379. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
Effectiveness and safety of simeprevir-based regimens for hepatitis C in Italy: The STIly observational study.基于西米普明的丙型肝炎治疗方案在意大利的有效性和安全性:STIly观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(27):e11307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011307.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplified and Integrated Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Treatment Algorithm for Unhoused People Who Inject Drugs.针对无家可归的注射吸毒者的简化综合丙型肝炎病毒检测与治疗算法
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 May 22;12(6):ofaf302. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf302. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Infectious Diseases Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Systematic Review of the Literature in the United States and Canada, 2003-2022.美国和加拿大 2003-2022 年流浪人群中传染病研究:文献系统性回顾
Public Health Rep. 2024 Sep-Oct;139(5):532-548. doi: 10.1177/00333549241228525. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
3
The Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative: Implementing a Community Cancer Genomics Program Across an Entire Rural State.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplification of Care for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.简化慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的治疗。
Semin Liver Dis. 2020 Nov;40(4):392-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713657. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
Effectiveness of implementing a decentralized delivery of hepatitis C virus treatment with direct-acting antivirals: A systematic review with meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒的去中心化实施效果:系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229143. eCollection 2020.
3
Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
缅因州癌症基因组学倡议:在整个农村州实施社区癌症基因组学计划。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 May;7:e2200619. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00619.
4
Association of Referral Source and Substance Use with Hepatitis C Virus Outcomes at a Southern Academic Medical Center.南方一所学术医疗中心转诊来源与物质使用情况与丙型肝炎病毒治疗结果的关联
South Med J. 2022 Jun;115(6):352-357. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001402.
5
Reflections on project ECHO: qualitative findings from five different ECHO programs.关于 ECHO 项目的思考:来自五个不同 ECHO 项目的定性发现。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1936435. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1936435.
《2019年丙型肝炎指南更新:美国肝病研究协会-美国传染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染检测、管理及治疗的建议》
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):686-721. doi: 10.1002/hep.31060.
4
A Simplified Algorithm for the Management of Hepatitis C Infection.丙型肝炎感染管理的简化算法
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2019 May;15(5 Suppl 3):1-12.
5
Estimating Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2013-2016.估计 2013-2016 年美国丙型肝炎病毒感染的流行率。
Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1020-1031. doi: 10.1002/hep.30297. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Hepatitis C care cascade among persons born 1945-1965: 3 medical centers.1945 年至 1965 年出生人群中的丙型肝炎护理路径:3 家医疗中心。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Sep;24(9):421-427.
7
High HCV cure rates for people who use drugs treated with direct acting antiviral therapy at an urban primary care clinic.在城市基层医疗诊所,采用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的吸毒者,其 HCV 治愈率较高。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Expansion of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection by Task Shifting to Community-Based Nonspecialist Providers: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.通过任务转移至社区非专科医疗人员扩大丙型肝炎病毒感染治疗:一项非随机临床试验
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):311-318. doi: 10.7326/M17-0118. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Primary Care Providers Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Related to Hepatitis C Screening and Treatment in the Oral Direct Acting Antiviral Agents Era.在口服直接抗病毒药物时代,基层医疗服务提供者与丙型肝炎筛查及治疗相关的知识、态度和实践
J Community Med Health Educ. 2016 Oct;6(5). doi: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000481. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
10
Implementation of the ECHO telementoring model for the treatment of patients with hepatitis C.实施 ECHO 远程指导模型以治疗丙型肝炎患者。
J Med Virol. 2017 Apr;89(4):660-664. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24668. Epub 2016 Sep 1.