Suppr超能文献

协商权利与信仰:巴基斯坦基于权利的人道主义行动方法研究。

Negotiating rights and faith: a study of rights-based approaches to humanitarian action in Pakistan.

机构信息

Senior Researcher, Peace Research Institute Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Disasters. 2022 Apr;46(2):427-449. doi: 10.1111/disa.12480. Epub 2022 Feb 1.

Abstract

'Rights-based approaches' (RBAs) have become a well-established concept over the past two decades, informing the work of diverse actors involved in development and humanitarian aid. Faith-based organisations have increasingly embraced the RBA, although not without contestation. Drawing on new qualitative data from Pakistan, this paper examines how 'global' RBA norms are operationalised in 'local' contexts characterised by great normative diversity and identifies three dominant normative frameworks used by non-governmental organisations in the translation of RBAs: humanitarian standards; citizens' rights; and Islamic principles. It utilises a case study of RBAs in Pakistan and reveals the significance of religion and religious entities in the translation of rights. From this example, the paper makes a conceptual distinction between 'instrumental' and 'substantial' modes of engagement, a framing that allows for a more detailed analysis of how humanitarian actors deal with religion and rights than what is often found in studies of humanitarian action.

摘要

“基于权利的方法”(RBA)在过去二十年中已经成为一个成熟的概念,为参与发展和人道主义援助的各种行为者的工作提供了信息。信仰组织越来越接受 RBA,尽管并非没有争议。本文利用来自巴基斯坦的新定性数据,研究了“全球”RBA 规范如何在以规范多样性很大为特征的“地方”背景下运作,并确定了非政府组织在将 RBA 进行翻译时使用的三个主要规范框架:人道主义标准、公民权利和伊斯兰原则。它利用了巴基斯坦 RBA 的案例研究,揭示了宗教和宗教实体在权利翻译中的重要性。从这个例子中,本文在“工具”和“实质”参与模式之间做出了概念上的区分,这种框架允许更详细地分析人道主义行为者如何处理宗教和权利问题,这比在人道主义行动研究中经常发现的更为详细。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验