Conflict Research Group, Ghent University, Universiteitsstraat 8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Disasters. 2009 Oct;33(4):608-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01090.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
This paper focuses on the emergence and modus operandi of Muslim faith-based aid organisations from the West, particularly those from the United Kingdom. Through case studies of Islamic Relief Worldwide and Muslim Hands, it examines the actual and potential added value generated by these humanitarian players in Muslim-majority contexts at times when aid actors from or associated with the West are being perceived by some as instrumental to the political agendas of Western powers, or are being confronted with the consequences thereof. The study analyses Muslim faith-based aid organisations' transnational networks, their implementing partnerships with local faith-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and their security position within and their access to insecure contexts, drawing on field examples and opinion from Central Asia, Iraq and Pakistan. It thereby argues that there is ground for an expansion of the role of Muslim aid actors, because of the existence of social and political realities in the field that cannot be always effectively tackled by the dominant international development approaches.
本文聚焦于西方,尤其是英国的穆斯林信仰为本的援助组织的出现及其运作模式。通过对“世界伊斯兰救济组织”(Islamic Relief Worldwide)和“穆斯林援助组织”(Muslim Hands)的案例研究,本文探讨了在某些人认为西方援助行为者的行为是西方大国政治议程的工具,或者面临这些行为的后果时,这些人道主义行为者在穆斯林占多数的背景下产生的实际和潜在附加值。该研究分析了穆斯林信仰为本的援助组织的跨国网络、它们与当地信仰为本的非政府组织(NGO)的实施伙伴关系,以及它们在不安全环境中的安全状况和进入这些环境的机会,援引了来自中亚、伊拉克和巴基斯坦的实地案例和意见。因此,本文认为,由于该领域存在社会和政治现实,主流国际发展方法并非总能有效地应对这些现实,因此有理由扩大穆斯林援助行为者的作用。