• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠肺炎附加中医治疗(ACCORD):医院注册回顾性队列研究。

Add-On Chinese Medicine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (ACCORD): A Retrospective Cohort Study of Hospital Registries.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Intelligence, School of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, P. R. China.

College of Information Engineering, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, P. R. China.

出版信息

Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(3):543-575. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500257. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1142/S0192415X21500257
PMID:33683189
Abstract

Chinese medicine (CM) was extensively used to treat COVID-19 in China. We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of add-on semi-individualized CM during the outbreak. A retrospective cohort of 1788 adult confirmed COVID-19 patients were recruited from 2235 consecutive linked records retrieved from five hospitals in Wuhan during 15 January to 13 March 2020. The mortality of add-on semi-individualized CM users and non-users was compared by inverse probability weighted hazard ratio (HR) and by propensity score matching. Change of biomarkers was compared between groups, and the frequency of CMs used was analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed to stratify disease severity and dose of CM exposure. The crude mortality was 3.8% in the semi-individualized CM user group and 17.0% among the non-users. Add-on CM was associated with a mortality reduction of 58% (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.77, [Formula: see text] = 0.005) among all COVID-19 cases and 66% (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.76, [Formula: see text] = 0.009) among severe/critical COVID-19 cases demonstrating dose-dependent response, after inversely weighted with propensity score. The result was robust in various stratified, weighted, matched, adjusted and sensitivity analyses. Severe/critical patients that received add-on CM had a trend of stabilized D-dimer level after 3-7 days of admission when compared to baseline. Immunomodulating and anti-asthmatic CMs were most used. Add-on semi-individualized CM was associated with significantly reduced mortality, especially among severe/critical cases. Chinese medicine could be considered as an add-on regimen for trial use.

摘要

中药(CM)在中国被广泛用于治疗 COVID-19。我们旨在评估在疫情期间添加半个体化 CM 的真实疗效。从 2020 年 1 月 15 日至 3 月 13 日,从武汉的五家医院连续检索到的 2235 份连续记录中,招募了 1788 名成年确诊 COVID-19 患者的回顾性队列。通过逆概率加权风险比(HR)和倾向评分匹配比较了添加半个体化 CM 使用者和非使用者的死亡率。比较了两组之间生物标志物的变化,并分析了 CM 的使用频率。进行了亚组分析以分层疾病严重程度和 CM 暴露剂量。半个体化 CM 用户组的粗死亡率为 3.8%,而非使用者组的死亡率为 17.0%。添加 CM 与所有 COVID-19 病例死亡率降低 58%(HR = 0.42,95%CI:0.23 至 0.77,[Formula: see text] = 0.005)和严重/危重症 COVID-19 病例死亡率降低 66%(HR = 0.34,95%CI:0.15 至 0.76,[Formula: see text] = 0.009)相关,经过倾向评分逆加权后。在各种分层、加权、匹配、调整和敏感性分析中,结果都是稳健的。与基线相比,接受添加 CM 的严重/危重症患者在入院后 3-7 天内 D-二聚体水平趋于稳定。免疫调节和抗哮喘 CM 是最常用的。添加半个体化 CM 与死亡率显著降低相关,尤其是在严重/危重症患者中。中药可被视为一种附加治疗方案进行试用。

相似文献

1
Add-On Chinese Medicine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (ACCORD): A Retrospective Cohort Study of Hospital Registries.新冠肺炎附加中医治疗(ACCORD):医院注册回顾性队列研究。
Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(3):543-575. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500257. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
2
Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulation Therapy in the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).中药配方疗法治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(7):1523-1538. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500755. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Evaluation of the Adjuvant Efficacy of Natural Herbal Medicine on COVID-19: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.评价天然草药对 COVID-19 的辅助疗效:一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究。
Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(4):779-792. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500391. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Efficacy and safety assessment of severe COVID-19 patients with Chinese medicine: A retrospective case series study at early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China.中药治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性评估:中国 COVID-19 疫情早期武汉的回顾性病例系列研究。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2021 Sep 15;277:113888. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.113888. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
5
Add-on Chinese medicine for hospitalized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CHOP): A cohort study of hospital registry.住院慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者加用中药治疗:医院注册队列研究。
Phytomedicine. 2023 Jan;109:154586. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154586. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
Chinese herbal medicine reduces mortality in patients with severe and critical Coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study.中药降低重症和危重症 2019 冠状病毒病患者死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Med. 2020 Dec;14(6):752-759. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0813-6. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Traditional Chinese Medicine Decoctions Significantly Reduce the Mortality in Severe and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.中药方剂显著降低 COVID-19 重症和危重症患者的死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(5):1063-1092. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500518. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
8
COVID-19 in cancer patients: clinical characteristics and outcome-an analysis of the LEOSS registry.癌症患者中的 COVID-19:临床特征和结局——LEOSS 登记处的分析。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb;100(2):383-393. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04328-4. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Effectiveness of Integrative Chinese-Western Medicine for Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.中西医结合治疗慢性肾脏病和糖尿病的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Chin Med. 2022;50(2):371-388. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X2250015X. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
10
Complementary Chinese herbal medicine therapy improves survival of patients with gastric cancer in Taiwan: A nationwide retrospective matched-cohort study.补充中草药疗法可提高台湾胃癌患者的生存率:一项全国性回顾性匹配队列研究。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Mar 6;199:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fuzheng Jiedu granules against disease progression among high-risk adults with non-severe COVID-19: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.扶正解毒颗粒对非重症新型冠状病毒肺炎高危成人疾病进展的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 12;16:1523004. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1523004. eCollection 2025.
2
Plant Metabolites as SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitors Candidates: In Silico and In Vitro Studies.植物代谢产物作为新型冠状病毒 2 型抑制剂的候选物:计算机模拟和体外研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;15(9):1045. doi: 10.3390/ph15091045.
3
Practicing traditional Chinese medicine in the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland - an exploratory study.
瑞士 COVID-19 大流行期间的中医实践 - 一项探索性研究。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Sep 15;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03715-w.
4
Role of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Severe or Critical COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.中医药在治疗重型或危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎中的作用:随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 15;13:926189. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.926189. eCollection 2022.
5
Mining intrinsic information of convalescent patients after suffering coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan.挖掘武汉新冠肺炎康复患者的内在信息。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2022 Apr;42(2):279-288. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20220225.001.
6
Potential Therapeutic Targets of Rehmannia Formulations on Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comparative Network Pharmacology Analysis.地黄制剂对糖尿病肾病的潜在治疗靶点:一项比较性网络药理学分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 21;13:794139. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.794139. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine for COVID-19: a systematic review.中医药治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效与机制:一项系统综述
Chin Med. 2022 Feb 28;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13020-022-00587-7.
8
Efficacy and Safety of "Three Chinese Patent Medicines and Three TCM Prescriptions" for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.“三种中成药和三个中药方剂”治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与网络Meta分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jan 12;2022:4654793. doi: 10.1155/2022/4654793. eCollection 2022.
9
Diversity and molecular network patterns of symptom phenotypes.症状表型的多样性和分子网络模式。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2021 Nov 30;7(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s41540-021-00206-5.
10
He-Jie-Shen-Shi Decoction as an Adjuvant Therapy on Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort and Potential Mechanistic Study.和剂参湿汤作为2019年重症冠状病毒病辅助治疗的回顾性队列及潜在机制研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 18;12:700498. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.700498. eCollection 2021.