• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Declining Accuracy of the Traditional Diamond-Forrester Estimates of Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: Time for New Methods.

作者信息

Gibbons Raymond J, Miller Todd D

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):579-580. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0171.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0171
PMID:33683301
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Declining Accuracy of the Traditional Diamond-Forrester Estimates of Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease: Time for New Methods.传统的钻石-福雷斯特对冠状动脉疾病预测试验概率估计的准确性下降：是时候采用新方法了。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 May 1;181(5):579-580. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0171.
2
Multicenter validation of the diagnostic accuracy of a blood-based gene expression test for assessing obstructive coronary artery disease in nondiabetic patients.多中心验证基于血液的基因表达测试在评估非糖尿病患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病中的诊断准确性。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 5;153(7):425-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00005.
3
Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter?有症状女性冠状动脉疾病不同心脏风险评分的比较：女性特异性危险因素重要吗？
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1443-50. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494571. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
4
Risk stratification of patients suspected of coronary artery disease: comparison of five different models.疑似冠心病患者的风险分层：五种不同模型的比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Feb;220(2):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.11.027. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
5
[Diamond-Forrester and cardiac CT : Is there a need to redefine the pretest probability of coronary artery disease?].[钻石-福雷斯特与心脏CT：是否有必要重新定义冠状动脉疾病的预检概率？]
Herz. 2016 Aug;41(5):371-5. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4437-1.
6
Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM).传统的年龄、性别和心绞痛典型性方法在预测行冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术患者的有意义的冠状动脉疾病的术前概率方面的表现：来自多国冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术评估临床结果的国际多中心注册研究（CONFIRM）的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2423-32, 1-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039255. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
7
Use of coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice - single centre experience in Switzerland in light of current recommendations based on pretest probability considerations.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术在临床实践中的应用——基于预检概率考量的当前建议下瑞士单中心经验
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Jan 27;149:w20010. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20010. eCollection 2019 Jan 14.
8
Incremental value of diagonal earlobe crease to the Diamond-Forrester classification in estimating the probability of significant coronary artery disease determined by computed tomographic angiography.在通过计算机断层血管造影术确定显著冠状动脉疾病概率时，耳垂对角线折痕对钻石-福雷斯特分类法的增量价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 1;114(11):1670-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Comparison of the CAD consortium and updated Diamond-Forrester scores for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease.CAD 联盟评分与更新后的 Diamond-Forrester 评分预测阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:200-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.056. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
Diagnostic Value of the Updated Diamond and Forrester Score to Predict Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute-Onset Chest Pain.更新后的钻石与弗雷斯特评分对急性胸痛患者冠状动脉疾病的诊断价值
Cardiology. 2016;133(1):10-7. doi: 10.1159/000438980. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Artery Calcium Score Improves Risk Assessment of Symptomatic Patients in Low-Risk Group Based on Current Guidelines.基于现行指南，冠状动脉钙化评分可改善低风险组有症状患者的风险评估。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 6;24(6):162. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406162. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Comparison of two diagnostic strategies for patients with stable chest pain suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome: rationale and design of the double-blind, pragmatic, randomized and controlled OPERATE Trial.两种诊断策略对稳定型胸痛患者的比较，这些患者的胸痛提示慢性冠状动脉综合征：双盲、实用、随机和对照的 OPERATE 试验的原理和设计。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03424-3.
3
External validation and update of the J-ACCESS model in an Italian cohort of patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
在接受应激心肌灌注成像的意大利患者队列中对 J-ACCESS 模型进行外部验证和更新。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;30(4):1443-1453. doi: 10.1007/s12350-022-03173-4. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Are risk factors necessary for pretest probability assessment of coronary artery disease? A patient similarity network analysis of the PROMISE trial.是否需要危险因素来评估冠心病的术前概率？来自 PROMISE 试验的患者相似网络分析。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Sep-Oct;16(5):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Contemporary Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.稳定型冠状动脉疾病的当代管理。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2022 May;29(3):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s40292-021-00497-z. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
6
Nuclear cardiac imaging between implementation and globalization: The key role of integration.核心脏成像从应用到全球化：整合的关键作用。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Jun;28(3):793-795. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02633-7. Epub 2021 Apr 30.