Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of vascular surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of vascular surgery, Berlin, Germany.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):711-719.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
In the present study, we have reported and compared aortoduodenal fistulas (ADFs) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs after open aortic repair (OAR).
We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients treated for ADFs from January 2015 to May 2020 in our hospital. The clinical data, diagnostic procedures, and surgical options were evaluated. The primary endpoints of the present study were 30-day and 1-year mortality. The secondary endpoints were major postoperative complications.
A total of 24 patients (20 men; median age, 69 years; range, 53-82 years) were admitted with ADFs after EVAR (n = 9) or OAR (n = 15). These patients accounted for ∼4.3% of all abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in our hospital. The median interval from the initial aortic repair and the diagnosis of ADF was 68 months (range, 6-83 months) for the ADF-EVAR group and 80 months (range, 1-479 months) for the ADF-OAR group. Three patients in the ADF-EVAR group had refused surgical treatment owing to their high surgical risk. One patient in the ADF-OAR group had undergone removal of the aortic prosthesis without replacement. Of the remaining 20 patients, 12 (ADF-EVAR group, n = 4; ADF-OAR group, n = 8) had undergone in situ replacement of the aorta and 8 (ADF-EVAR group, n = 2; ADF-OAR group, n = 6) had undergone extra-anatomic reconstruction with aortic ligation. After a mean follow-up of 26 months, no patient had experienced early limb loss. However, one case of rupture of the venous graft (ADF-EVAR), one case of aortic stump blowout (ADF-OAR), and one case of a ureteroarterial fistula with a homograft (ADF-OAR) had occurred. Overall, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly greater after ADF-OAR (93% vs 33%; P = .036). The most frequent bacteria involved in the blood cultures were Escherichia coli (25% of patients), and Candida spp. (61%) were the predominant pathogens found on intra-abdominal smears. The in-hospital mortality rates for the ADF-EVAR and ADF-OAR group were 22% and 13%, respectively. The corresponding 1 -year mortality rates were 22% and 33%.
Patients with ADFs after EVAR or OAR have limited overall survival. In addition to the similar therapeutic approaches, we found no significant differences in postoperative mortality between these two uncommon pathologic entities. In our study, the overall postoperative morbidity seemed greater for the ADF-OAR group.
本研究报告并比较了血管内腹主动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后和开放主动脉修复(OAR)后发生的主动脉十二指肠瘘(ADF)。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月在我院治疗的 ADF 患者的数据。评估了临床资料、诊断程序和手术选择。本研究的主要终点为 30 天和 1 年死亡率。次要终点为主要术后并发症。
共有 24 例患者(20 例男性;中位年龄 69 岁;范围 53-82 岁)因 EVAR(n=9)或 OAR(n=15)后发生 ADF 而入院。这些患者占我院所有腹主动脉瘤修复的约 4.3%。ADF-EVAR 组的初始主动脉修复和 ADF 诊断之间的中位间隔为 68 个月(范围 6-83 个月),ADF-OAR 组为 80 个月(范围 1-479 个月)。ADF-EVAR 组有 3 例患者因手术风险高而拒绝手术治疗。ADF-OAR 组中有 1 例患者行主动脉假体取出术而未行置换。在其余 20 例患者中,12 例(ADF-EVAR 组,n=4;ADF-OAR 组,n=8)行原位主动脉置换,8 例(ADF-EVAR 组,n=2;ADF-OAR 组,n=6)行主动脉结扎的非解剖重建。平均随访 26 个月后,无患者发生早期肢体丧失。然而,1 例静脉移植物破裂(ADF-EVAR)、1 例主动脉残端破裂(ADF-OAR)和 1 例同种异体移植物输尿管-动脉瘘(ADF-OAR)。总的来说,ADF-OAR 组的术后并发症发生率显著更高(93%比 33%;P=0.036)。血培养中最常见的细菌为大肠埃希菌(25%的患者),腹腔涂片最常见的病原体为假丝酵母菌属(61%)。ADF-EVAR 组和 ADF-OAR 组的院内死亡率分别为 22%和 13%。相应的 1 年死亡率分别为 22%和 33%。
EVAR 或 OAR 后发生 ADF 的患者总体生存情况较差。除了治疗方法相似外,我们发现这两种罕见的病理实体之间术后死亡率无显著差异。在我们的研究中,ADF-OAR 组的总体术后发病率似乎更高。