Suppr超能文献

开发、验证和评估直肠癌造口术患者信息手册:三步法。

Development, validation and evaluation of a patient information booklet for rectal cancer survivors with a stoma: A three-step approach.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2275-2285. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.045. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Quantitatively measure the degree of patient satisfaction and perceived acquired knowledge through the development of a patient information booklet for rectal cancer survivors with a stoma, according to a novel three-step approach.

METHODS

The study included a systematic literature review to identify relevant information for the booklet, which was validated by experts based on relevance, clarity and essentiality. It underwent testing on quality, readability, and layout and design and was quantitatively evaluated by rectal cancer survivors with a stoma.

RESULTS

In total, 145 articles were used for the development of the booklet. It scored 91% for relevance according to 17 experts, 70% for readability, 75.63% for quality and 23 out of 32 for design. The mean score of patient satisfaction was 8.03 out of 10. All 20 patients found the booklet 'useful' and 95% felt better informed.

CONCLUSIONS

The booklet scored high for patient satisfaction and increased perceived acquired information. It ensured satisfactory levels of quality, readability, and layout and design.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This study offers a novel three-step approach for development of informational tools for cancer survivors, assuring that a variety of newly created written patient materials would be of increased quality and relevance to any target population.

摘要

目的

通过开发一种针对直肠癌造口幸存者的患者信息手册,采用一种新的三步法来定量衡量患者满意度和感知获得的知识程度。

方法

本研究包括对与手册相关的信息进行系统文献回顾,根据相关性、清晰度和必要性由专家进行验证。该手册经过质量、可读性、布局和设计方面的测试,并由直肠癌造口幸存者进行了定量评估。

结果

共使用了 145 篇文章来开发手册。根据 17 位专家的评估,该手册的相关性得分为 91%,可读性得分为 70%,质量得分为 75.63%,设计得分为 23 分(满分 32 分)。患者满意度平均得分为 10 分中的 8.03 分。20 名患者均认为手册“有用”,95%的患者表示感觉信息更充足。

结论

该手册在患者满意度和增加感知获得的信息方面得分较高。它确保了满意的质量、可读性、布局和设计水平。

实践意义

本研究为癌症幸存者的信息工具开发提供了一种新的三步法,确保各种新创建的书面患者材料的质量和相关性将提高到任何目标人群的水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验