• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护专业人员对老年患者治疗结果的优先事项了解程度如何?

How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2358-2363. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.044
PMID:33685764
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities regarding health outcomes. Our aim was to study whether healthcare professionals know these priorities.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study we included older patients who had to make a treatment decision, their general practitioners (GPs) and their medical specialists. Agreement between the patients' main health outcome as prioritised by using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and the perception of the same outcome by their healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included. Median age was 76 years, 87.4% of patients presented with malignant disease. The majority prioritised maintaining independence (51.7%), followed by extending life (27.6%). The agreement between patients and healthcare professionals was low (GPs 41.7%, kappa 0.067, p = 0.39), medical specialists 40.3%, kappa 0.074, p = 0.33). Positively related to agreement was patient's age > 75, and a longer relation with their patients (for GPs), and the patient having no partner (for medical specialist). Having a malignant disease, dependent living and functional deficits were negatively related to agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals have poor perceptions of their patients' priorities.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

To realise patient-centered care, it is crucial to discuss priorities explicitly with all patients.

摘要

目的

对于共同决策,确定患者对健康结果的优先事项至关重要。我们的目的是研究医疗保健专业人员是否了解这些优先事项。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了需要做出治疗决策的老年患者、他们的全科医生(GP)和他们的医学专家。使用结果优先排序工具(OPT)对患者的主要健康结果进行优先排序,并将其与医疗保健专业人员对同一结果的看法进行比较。

结果

共纳入 87 名患者。中位年龄为 76 岁,87.4%的患者患有恶性疾病。大多数患者将保持独立(51.7%)作为首要目标,其次是延长生命(27.6%)。患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的一致性较低(GP 为 41.7%,kappa 值为 0.067,p=0.39),医学专家为 40.3%,kappa 值为 0.074,p=0.33)。一致性与患者年龄>75 岁、与患者的关系时间较长(对于 GP)以及患者没有伴侣(对于医学专家)呈正相关。患有恶性疾病、生活依赖和功能缺陷与一致性呈负相关。

结论

医疗保健专业人员对患者优先事项的看法较差。

实践意义

为了实现以患者为中心的护理,与所有患者明确讨论优先事项至关重要。

相似文献

1
How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?医护专业人员对老年患者治疗结果的优先事项了解程度如何?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2358-2363. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
'What matters to you?' Health outcome prioritisation in treatment decision-making for older patients.“对你来说重要的是什么?”老年患者治疗决策中的健康结果优先排序。
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):2264-2269. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab160.
3
Cross-sectional study assessing health outcome priorities of older adults with multimorbidity at a primary care setting in Singapore.在新加坡的基层医疗机构中,对患有多种慢性病的老年人的健康结果重点进行横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 11;13(12):e079990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079990.
4
Health outcome priorities in older patients with head and neck cancer.老年头颈部癌症患者的健康结局重点。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(5):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Patients' perception of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.患者对初级保健和二级保健之间沟通的感知:34 个国家的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4848-9.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
General practitioners' predictions of their own patients' health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium.全科医生对其自身患者健康素养的预测:比利时的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029357.
9
Patient-Physician Agreement in Reporting and Prioritizing Existing Chronic Conditions.患者-医生在报告和优先考虑现有慢性疾病方面的协议。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):396-402. doi: 10.1370/afm.2444.
10
Multimorbidity: can general practitioners identify the health conditions most important to their patients? Results from a national cross-sectional study in Switzerland.多重疾病:全科医生能否识别出对患者最重要的健康状况?瑞士一项全国性横断面研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 17;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0757-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Postgraduate Medical Education: The Role of Disease-Centered Beliefs.研究生医学教育中实施共同决策的障碍:以疾病为中心的信念的作用。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;14(1):436-446. doi: 10.5334/pme.1465. eCollection 2025.
2
General practitioners' perceptions on decision aids in healthcare: a qualitative study in Portugal.全科医生对医疗保健中决策辅助工具的看法:葡萄牙的一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03044-1.
3
Reconceptualisation of sport and quality of life in young athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: understanding the experiences behind the numbers through a prospective mixed-methods study.
前交叉韧带重建术后年轻运动员对运动和生活质量的重新认识:通过一项前瞻性混合方法研究了解数据背后的经历。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Mar 13;11(1):e002107. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002107. eCollection 2025.
4
Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study.在开发支持患有多种疾病的老年患者初级保健的数字工具过程中整合全科医生和患者的观点:一项焦点小组研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 21;7:1499333. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1499333. eCollection 2025.
5
Considerations to forgo systemic treatment in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study.晚期食管癌或胃癌患者放弃全身治疗的考量:一项真实世界证据研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 May 15;156(10):1950-1960. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35314. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Outcome prioritization and preferences among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial.癌症老年患者在随机临床试验中开始化疗后的结局优先化和偏好。
Cancer. 2024 Sep 1;130(17):3000-3010. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35333. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
7
Cross-sectional study assessing health outcome priorities of older adults with multimorbidity at a primary care setting in Singapore.在新加坡的基层医疗机构中,对患有多种慢性病的老年人的健康结果重点进行横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 11;13(12):e079990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079990.
8
Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review.肿瘤学中患者对治疗结果的偏好,重点关注老年患者——一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051147.