Suppr超能文献

微血管吻合器与手工缝合技术在动脉吻合中的比较:系统评价。

Microvascular anastomotic coupler devices versus hand-sewn technique for arterial anastomosis: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, North Manchester General Hospital, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;59(5):524-533. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.286. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Abstract

The use of microvascular anastomotic coupling devices (MACD) is an established technique for venous anastomosis. However, literature on arterial MACD is conflicting. We report, to our knowledge, the first registered systematic review of its kind to evaluate the safety and efficiency of arterial MACD in free flaps. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PROSPERO-registered) and identified reports using a search algorithm in MEDLINE/EMBASE. The rate of arterial thrombosis was set as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included flap survival, failure rates, and comparison of MACD and the conventional hand-sewn technique. From the 17 studies identified, 2672 free flap reconstructions were performed and 640 arterial anastomoses with MACD attempted (622 completed, 97.2%). The pooled incidence of arterial thrombosis was 2.1% (13/622), and overall flap failure rate 4.34% (116/2672). The total number of arterial MACD procedures performed first time, with no perioperative complications, revisions, or thrombosis, was 88.9% (569/640). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) quality analysis revealed low quality and significant heterogeneity. The use of arterial MACD is a safe and efficient alternative to hand-sewn anastomosis, with more recent literature showing excellent results. However, further evaluation is required with controlled trials.

摘要

使用微血管吻合耦合装置(MACD)是静脉吻合的成熟技术。然而,关于动脉 MACD 的文献存在争议。我们报告了,据我们所知,这是首例对此类装置在游离皮瓣中安全性和有效性进行评估的注册系统评价。我们进行了 PRISMA 指导的系统评价(PROSPERO 注册),并使用 MEDLINE/EMBASE 的搜索算法确定了报告。动脉血栓形成的发生率被设定为主要结局。次要结局包括皮瓣存活率、失败率以及 MACD 与传统手工缝合技术的比较。从确定的 17 项研究中,共进行了 2672 例游离皮瓣重建,尝试了 640 例动脉 MACD 吻合(622 例完成,97.2%)。动脉血栓形成的总发生率为 2.1%(13/622),总的皮瓣失败率为 4.34%(116/2672)。首次无围手术期并发症、修正或血栓形成的动脉 MACD 手术总数为 88.9%(569/640)。推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)质量分析显示为低质量和显著异质性。与手工吻合相比,动脉 MACD 的使用是一种安全且有效的替代方法,最近的文献显示出了良好的结果。然而,还需要进一步的对照试验进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验