• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.标准化与定制化:寻找平衡点。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):171-177. doi: 10.1370/afm.2654.
2
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.(再)铺普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化与定制化在医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):301-304. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.35.
3
Managing customization in health care: a framework derived from the services sector literature.管理医疗保健中的定制化:一个源自服务业文献的框架。
Health Policy. 2014 Aug;117(2):216-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study.慢性病照护中标准化与定制化平衡的价值配置:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06844-z.
5
Eliminating Undesirable Variation in Neonatal Practice: Balancing Standardization and Customization.消除新生儿护理实践中的不良差异:平衡标准化与个性化
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Sep;44(3):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".二人转:定制化与标准化作为医疗保健中的共谋逻辑 述评:“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的再打造:标准化与定制化作为医疗保健中的竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):183-185. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.77.
7
Standardized Best Practices and Individual Craft-Based Medicine: A Conversation About Quality.标准化最佳实践和个体化基于技艺的医学:关于质量的对话。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jun 1;176(6):835-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1641.
8
Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".提供者和患者夹在标准化和个体化之间:个体化标准化作为一种解决方案 评“(再)打造普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?医疗保健中的标准化和定制化作为竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):349-352. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95.
9
Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".走向定制化医疗服务 评“普罗克汝斯忒斯之床的重塑?医疗保健领域的标准化与定制化:两种竞争逻辑”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):272-274. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.84.
10
Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".两全其美评论:“(重新)制作普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?标准化和定制化作为医疗保健领域的竞争逻辑”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):356-358. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.99.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing psychological wellbeing in hip surgery patients through psychological interventions: a scoping review.通过心理干预提高髋关节手术患者的心理健康:一项范围综述
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 4;26(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08965-6.
2
Implementation of Point-of-Care PCR-testing for the diagnosis of respiratory infections in vulnerable patient populations.即时检验聚合酶链反应检测在脆弱患者群体呼吸道感染诊断中的应用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0307621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307621. eCollection 2025.
3
The Wall of Stigma-A Qualitative Study on the Health Perceptions of Socially Marginalised Patients.耻辱之墙——对社会边缘化患者健康认知的定性研究
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70091. doi: 10.1111/scs.70091.
4
Primary care staff members' experiences with managing electronic health record inbox messages.基层医疗工作人员处理电子健康记录收件箱信息的经验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jun 1;32(6):1040-1049. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf067.
5
Perspectives on Team-Based Care in Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study on Interprofessional Collaboration in a Hospital Setting.家庭医学中基于团队的照护观点:一项关于医院环境中跨专业协作的混合方法研究。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81388. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81388. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Exploring Physicians' Dual Perspectives on the Transition From Free Text to Structured and Standardized Documentation Practices: Interview and Participant Observational Study.探索医生对从自由文本过渡到结构化和标准化文档实践的双重观点:访谈与参与观察研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 21;9:e63902. doi: 10.2196/63902.
7
Emerging Domains for Measuring Health Care Delivery With Electronic Health Record Metadata.利用电子健康记录元数据衡量医疗服务提供的新兴领域。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e64721. doi: 10.2196/64721.
8
Identifying unmet palliative care needs of nursing home residents: A scoping review.识别养老院居民未满足的姑息治疗需求:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0319403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319403. eCollection 2025.
9
A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare.关于临床医生如何在围手术期路径开发中达成共识的定性研究:医疗保健标准化共识模型
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 4;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9.
10
Improving Evidenced-based Outpatient Order Set Utilization in the Gastrointestinal Division of a Large Pediatric Health System.提高大型儿科医疗系统胃肠科基于证据的门诊医嘱集利用率。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 23;10(1):e792. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000792. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
IDENTIFYING SOURCES OF INEFFICIENCY IN HEALTHCARE.识别医疗保健中的低效根源。
Q J Econ. 2020 May;135(2):785-843. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjz040. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Electronic health records and burnout: Time spent on the electronic health record after hours and message volume associated with exhaustion but not with cynicism among primary care clinicians.电子健康记录与倦怠:工作时间外查看电子健康记录的时间以及信息数量与初级保健临床医生的疲惫感相关,但与犬儒主义无关。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):531-538. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz220.
3
Advanced team-based care: How we made it work.基于团队的高级护理:我们是如何使其发挥作用的。
J Fam Pract. 2019 Sep;68(7):E1-E8.
4
Staff perception of Lean, care-giving, thriving and exhaustion: a longitudinal study in primary care.员工对精益、关爱、茁壮成长和疲惫的感知:初级保健中的纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4502-6.
5
Powering-Up Primary Care Teams: Advanced Team Care With In-Room Support.增强基层医疗团队实力:提供病房内支持的进阶团队照护。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):367-371. doi: 10.1370/afm.2422.
6
A Preference-Based Model of Care: An Integrative Theoretical Model of the Role of Preferences in Person-Centered Care.偏好导向型照护模式:以偏好为中心的个体照护角色的综合理论模型
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):376-384. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz075.
7
Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices.推动实施科学理论,增强基层医疗实践。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):250-256. doi: 10.1370/afm.2353.
8
A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care.一种新的初级保健高价值方面的综合衡量指标。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):221-230. doi: 10.1370/afm.2393.
9
METRICS for Metrics.
WMJ. 2018 Aug;117(3):104-105.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines: What's Next?临床实践指南:接下来会怎样?
JAMA. 2018 Aug 28;320(8):757-758. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9660.

标准化与定制化:寻找平衡点。

Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.

机构信息

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois

Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):171-177. doi: 10.1370/afm.2654.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2654
PMID:33685879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7939702/
Abstract

There is an inherent tension between standardization and customization of care delivery processes. The challenge for health care systems is to achieve the right balance. At its best, standardized work can create efficiencies that generate the additional time needed for personalized care. Similarly, at its best, customization allows the people within a system to accommodate the needs, preferences, and circumstances of the unique individuals and local communities they serve. We provide examples and offer principles to decide when standardization offers the most successful path and when customization may be preferred. We believe that, in sum, the balance has shifted too far toward standardization and that a rebalancing toward customization will benefit patients, clinicians, and the health care system.

摘要

在医疗服务流程的标准化和定制化之间存在着固有的紧张关系。医疗保健系统面临的挑战是要找到恰当的平衡点。从最好的方面来说,标准化工作可以提高效率,从而为个性化护理腾出所需的额外时间。同样,从最好的方面来说,定制化允许系统内的人员满足他们所服务的独特个体和当地社区的需求、偏好和情况。我们提供了一些示例,并提出了一些原则来决定何时标准化提供最成功的路径,何时定制化可能更可取。我们相信,总的来说,这种平衡已经过于偏向标准化,向定制化的重新平衡将使患者、临床医生和医疗保健系统受益。