• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医学中基于团队的照护观点:一项关于医院环境中跨专业协作的混合方法研究。

Perspectives on Team-Based Care in Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study on Interprofessional Collaboration in a Hospital Setting.

作者信息

Ohara Junya, Ohta Ryuichi, Sano Chiaki

机构信息

Family Medicine, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.

Community Care, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81388. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81388. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.81388
PMID:40296950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034898/
Abstract

Introduction Interprofessional team-based care has been increasingly recognized as a crucial strategy for enhancing healthcare quality and efficiency. Team-based care fosters comprehensive, patient-centered care by integrating various healthcare professionals, such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and rehabilitation specialists, improving coordination and communication while reducing medical errors. Despite the benefits, challenges such as team composition, workflow integration, and professional role clarity remain, necessitating further investigation. This study examines different healthcare professionals' perspectives on introducing team-based care in family medicine within a hospital setting. Methods This mixed-method study was conducted at Unnan City Hospital, a regional hospital in Japan. A total of 220 healthcare professionals, including nurses, therapists, medical technicians, pharmacists, and social workers, participated in a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed perceptions of team-based care regarding consultation ease, coordination, understanding of physicians' perspectives, patient satisfaction, work efficiency, and stress levels. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical tests, including chi-square and Kraskal-Wallis analyses, while qualitative responses were thematically analyzed. Results Findings indicate that healthcare professionals generally perceived team-based care positively, particularly in enhancing communication and interdisciplinary collaboration. Nurses and therapists reported improved work efficiency and stress reduction, whereas technicians and pharmacists expressed concerns about increased workload and role ambiguity. Social workers demonstrated the most favorable perception, highlighting patient-centered care and teamwork benefits. However, inconsistencies in information sharing, decision-making, and workload distribution were identified as key challenges. Conclusion While team-based care enhances collaboration and patient-centered approaches in family medicine, its effectiveness is influenced by professional role clarity and structured implementation. Addressing communication gaps, streamlining decision-making processes, and developing standardized protocols are essential for optimizing team-based care. Future research should assess long-term impacts on patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

摘要

引言 基于跨专业团队的护理日益被视为提高医疗质量和效率的关键策略。基于团队的护理通过整合各类医疗专业人员,如医生、护士、药剂师和康复专家,促进全面的、以患者为中心的护理,改善协调与沟通,同时减少医疗差错。尽管有这些益处,但团队构成、工作流程整合和专业角色清晰度等挑战依然存在,需要进一步研究。本研究考察了不同医疗专业人员对在医院环境中的家庭医学中引入基于团队的护理的看法。

方法 这项混合方法研究在日本地区医院云南市立医院进行。共有220名医疗专业人员参与了结构化问卷调查,其中包括护士、治疗师、医学技术员、药剂师和社会工作者。该问卷评估了对基于团队的护理在会诊便利性、协调、对医生观点的理解、患者满意度、工作效率和压力水平方面的看法。定量数据使用统计检验进行分析,包括卡方检验和克拉斯卡尔 - 沃利斯分析,而定性回答则进行主题分析。

结果 研究结果表明,医疗专业人员总体上对基于团队的护理持积极看法,特别是在加强沟通和跨学科协作方面。护士和治疗师报告工作效率提高且压力减轻,而技术员和药剂师则对工作量增加和角色模糊表示担忧。社会工作者表现出最积极的看法,强调以患者为中心的护理和团队合作的益处。然而,信息共享、决策和工作量分配方面的不一致被确定为关键挑战。

结论 虽然基于团队的护理在家庭医学中增强了协作和以患者为中心的方法,但其有效性受到专业角色清晰度和结构化实施的影响。解决沟通差距、简化决策流程以及制定标准化方案对于优化基于团队的护理至关重要。未来的研究应评估对患者结局和医疗效率的长期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/961f/12034898/f82f0adc579e/cureus-0017-00000081388-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/961f/12034898/f82f0adc579e/cureus-0017-00000081388-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/961f/12034898/f82f0adc579e/cureus-0017-00000081388-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspectives on Team-Based Care in Family Medicine: A Mixed-Methods Study on Interprofessional Collaboration in a Hospital Setting.家庭医学中基于团队的照护观点:一项关于医院环境中跨专业协作的混合方法研究。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 28;17(3):e81388. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81388. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
3
Interprofessional Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Non-Physician Perspectives on Resident Competency.跨专业协作:非医师视角下对住院医师能力的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4238-0. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
7
Evolution of the roles of family physicians through collaboration with rehabilitation therapists in rural community hospitals: a grounded theory approach.家庭医生与农村社区医院康复治疗师合作角色的演变:扎根理论方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 3;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02540-z.
8
Experiences and shared meaning of teamwork and interprofessional collaboration among health care professionals in primary health care settings: a systematic review.基层医疗保健机构中医疗保健专业人员团队合作与跨专业协作的经验及共享意义:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Nov;15(11):2723-2788. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003016.
9
Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.精神卫生保健中的共同决策和跨专业合作:探索障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep;27(5):373-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.785503. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
A Qualitative Study of Patient and Interprofessional Healthcare Team Member Experiences of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds at a VA: Language, Teamwork, and Trust.一项关于退伍军人事务部(VA)床边跨学科查房中患者及跨专业医疗团队成员体验的定性研究:语言、团队合作与信任
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):538-546. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09124-8. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Team-based care in specialist practice: a path to improved physician experience in British Columbia.专科医师实践中的团队式照护:提升不列颠哥伦比亚省医师体验的途径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11482-2.
2
The Quality of Family Medicine Team Conferences Through the Lens of a Director: An Autoethnography.从主任视角看家庭医学团队会议的质量:一项自我民族志研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):e64173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64173. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Transformation of primary care settings implementing a co-located team-based care model: a scoping review.
实施基于团队的共置护理模式的初级保健环境的转变:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11291-7.
4
Evolution of the roles of family physicians through collaboration with rehabilitation therapists in rural community hospitals: a grounded theory approach.家庭医生与农村社区医院康复治疗师合作角色的演变:扎根理论方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 3;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02540-z.
5
Interprofessional education in cancer care - a scoping review.癌症护理中的跨专业教育——一项范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05669-8.
6
The Impact of Primary Care Clinic and Family Physician Continuity on Patient Health Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis From Alberta, Canada.初级保健诊所和家庭医生连续性对患者健康结果的影响:来自加拿大艾伯塔省的回顾性分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):223-229. doi: 10.1370/afm.3107.
7
Interprofessional collaboration to improve care for patients with diabetes.跨专业合作以改善糖尿病患者的护理。
Nurse Pract. 2024 May 1;49(5):34-39. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000175.
8
Role of family medicine physicians in providing nutrition support to older patients admitted to orthopedics departments: a grounded theory approach.家庭医学医师在为骨科住院老年患者提供营养支持方面的作用:扎根理论方法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 19;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02379-4.
9
Decision-Making in the Admission of Older Patients: A Thematic Analysis From Multiple-Stakeholder Perspectives.老年患者入院决策:多利益相关者视角的主题分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 9;16(1):e51966. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51966. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Relationship between Anemia and Readmission among Older Patients in Rural Community Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study.农村社区医院老年患者贫血与再入院之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 18;13(2):539. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020539.