Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon, Phone: +961-1-421000 ext 2800, e-mail:
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):1091-1097.
To assess the sealing ability of two calcium silicate-based materials in the treatment of iatrogenic furcal perforations using a dye-penetration leakage model.
Furcation perforations were performed using a size 12 round burr on the pulp chamber floor of 20 first mandibular molars. The teeth were then randomly divided into two groups, two additional molars served as negative controls. The defects were then filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus in the first group and Biodentine in the second group. Leakage at the repaired sites was then evaluated using the methylene blue dye penetration technique.
Significant differences in microleakage were found between the two groups at 72 hours ( < 0.001). MTA Angelus had greater dye penetration than Biodentine with a statistically significant difference. Subsequently, the sealing ability of Biodentine was significantly better than MTA Angelus ( < 0.001). However, the mean values of leakage and inadequate adhesion were significantly different from the theoretical value for both the MTA Angelus ( < 0.001) and Biodentine ( < 0.001).
The current results suggested that Biodentine possesses higher sealing quality than MTA Angelus. Yet, both materials are not ideal and still need improvement to ensure perfect adhesion in case of furcal perforation.
This article aims to compare the sealing ability of one dental repair material over another, after iatrogenically producing a furcal perforation. Leakage resistance and sealing ability are important factors in favoring the outcome of an endodontic treatment of a tooth that could otherwise be condemned for extraction.
使用染料渗透渗漏模型评估两种基于硅酸钙的材料在治疗医源性根分叉穿孔中的密封能力。
在 20 颗下颌第一磨牙的牙髓室底部使用 12 号圆形磨头制作根分叉穿孔。然后将牙齿随机分为两组,另外两颗磨牙作为阴性对照。然后,在第一组中用矿物三氧化物聚合体(MTA)Angelus 和在第二组中用 Biodentine 填充缺陷。然后使用亚甲蓝染料渗透技术评估修复部位的渗漏情况。
在 72 小时时,两组之间的微渗漏差异显著(<0.001)。MTA Angelus 的染料渗透量大于 Biodentine,具有统计学意义。随后,Biodentine 的密封能力明显优于 MTA Angelus(<0.001)。然而,MTA Angelus(<0.001)和 Biodentine(<0.001)的渗漏平均值和不充分粘附值与理论值显著不同。
目前的结果表明,Biodentine 比 MTA Angelus 具有更高的密封质量。然而,这两种材料都不理想,仍然需要改进,以确保在发生根分叉穿孔时具有完美的粘附力。
本文旨在比较一种牙科修复材料与另一种牙科修复材料的密封能力,即在医源性产生根分叉穿孔后。抗渗漏性和密封能力是有利于牙齿根管治疗结果的重要因素,否则这些牙齿可能会被拔除。