Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Human Development Graduate Group & Center for Mind and Brain, University of California at Davis, Davis, United States.
Elife. 2021 Mar 9;10:e62520. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62520.
Accurate memories are often associated with vivid experiences of recollection. However, the neural mechanisms underlying subjective recollection and their unique role in decision making beyond accuracy have received limited attention. We dissociated subjective recollection from accuracy during a forced-choice task. Distractors corresponded either to non-studied exemplars of the targets (A-A' condition) or to non-studied exemplars of different studied items (A-B' condition). The A-A' condition resulted in higher accuracy and greater activation in the superior parietal lobe, whereas the A-B' condition resulted in higher subjective recollection and greater activation in the precuneus and retrosplenial regions, indicating a dissociation between objective and subjective memory. Activation in insular, cingulate, and lateral prefrontal regions was also associated with subjective recollection; however, during a subsequent decision phase, activation in these same regions was greater for discarded than for selected responses in anticipation of a social reward, underscoring their role in evaluating memory evidence flexibly based on current goals.
准确的记忆通常与生动的回忆体验相关。然而,主观回忆的神经机制及其在准确性之外对决策的独特作用,一直受到关注。我们在一项强制选择任务中,将主观回忆与准确性区分开来。干扰项要么与目标的未学习范例相对应(A-A'条件),要么与不同学习项目的未学习范例相对应(A-B'条件)。A-A'条件导致更高的准确性和顶叶上回更高的激活,而 A-B'条件导致更高的主观回忆和后扣带回和后扣带回区域更高的激活,表明客观记忆和主观记忆之间的分离。岛叶、扣带回和外侧前额叶区域的激活也与主观回忆有关;然而,在随后的决策阶段,在预期社会奖励的情况下,与被舍弃的反应相比,这些相同区域的激活对于被选择的反应更大,这强调了它们在根据当前目标灵活评估记忆证据方面的作用。