• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狒狒(Papio papio)统治等级的计算机评估。

Computerized assessment of dominance hierarchy in baboons (Papio papio).

机构信息

Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille University, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bât. 9, Case D, 13331, Marseille cedex 1, France.

Station de Primatologie-Celphedia, Rousset, France.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1923-1934. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01539-z. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01539-z
PMID:33687699
Abstract

Dominance hierarchies are an important aspect of Primate social life, and there is an increasing need to develop new systems to collect social information automatically. The main goal of this research was to explore the possibility to infer the dominance hierarchy of a group of Guinea baboons (Papio papio) from the analysis of their spontaneous interactions with freely accessible automated learning devices for monkeys (ALDM, Fagot & Bonté Behavior Research Methods, 42, 507-516, 2010). Experiment 1 compared the dominance hierarchy obtained from conventional observations of agonistic behaviours to the one inferred from the analysis of automatically recorded supplanting behaviours within the ALDM workstations. The comparison, applied to three different datasets, shows that the dominance hierarchies obtained with the two methods are highly congruent (all rs ≥ 0.75). Experiment 2 investigated the experimental potential of inferring dominance hierarchy from ALDM testing. ALDM data previously published in Goujon and Fagot (Behavioural Brain Research, 247, 101-109, 2013) were re-analysed for that purpose. Results indicate that supplanting events within the workstations lead to a transient improvement of cognitive performance for the baboon supplanting its partners and that this improvement depends on the difference in rank between the two baboons. This study therefore opens new perspectives for cognitive studies conducted in a social context.

摘要

统治等级制度是灵长类动物社会生活的一个重要方面,因此越来越需要开发新的系统来自动收集社会信息。本研究的主要目的是探索从分析其与猴子自由访问的自动化学习设备(ALDM、Fagot 和 Bonté 行为研究方法,42,507-516,2010)的自发互动中推断一群豚尾狒(Papio papio)的统治等级的可能性。实验 1 将通过传统观察侵略行为获得的统治等级与通过分析自动记录的 ALDM 工作站内的取代行为推断的统治等级进行了比较。该比较应用于三个不同的数据集,表明两种方法获得的统治等级高度一致(所有 rs≥0.75)。实验 2 研究了从 ALDM 测试中推断统治等级的实验潜力。为此,重新分析了 Goujon 和 Fagot 之前在《行为脑研究》(Behavioural Brain Research,247,101-109,2013)中发表的 ALDM 数据。结果表明,工作站内的取代事件会导致取代其伙伴的豚尾狒的认知表现暂时提高,而这种提高取决于两只豚尾狒之间的等级差异。因此,这项研究为在社会背景下进行的认知研究开辟了新的前景。

相似文献

1
Computerized assessment of dominance hierarchy in baboons (Papio papio).狒狒(Papio papio)统治等级的计算机评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1923-1934. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01539-z. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Effects of freely accessible computerized test systems on the spontaneous behaviors and stress level of Guinea baboons (Papio papio).自由访问的计算机化测试系统对豚尾猴(Papio papio)自发行为和应激水平的影响。
Am J Primatol. 2014 Jan;76(1):56-64. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22193. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio).猴子认知能力的自动化测试:使用一系列计算机化测试系统对一群半自由放养的狒狒(Papio papio)进行测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):507-16. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.507.
4
Using Automated Learning Devices for Monkeys (ALDM) to study social networks.使用猴子自动学习设备(ALDM)来研究社交网络。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):24-34. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0686-9.
5
Assessment of social cognition in non-human primates using a network of computerized automated learning device (ALDM) test systems.使用计算机化自动学习设备(ALDM)测试系统网络评估非人类灵长类动物的社会认知。
J Vis Exp. 2015 May 5(99):e52798. doi: 10.3791/52798.
6
Social behavior and patterns of testosterone and glucocorticoid levels differ between male chacma and Guinea baboons.雄性南非大狒狒和几内亚狒狒的社会行为以及睾酮和糖皮质激素水平模式存在差异。
Horm Behav. 2015 Sep;75:100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
Assessing the reliability of an automated method for measuring dominance hierarchy in non-human primates.评估一种用于测量非人类灵长类动物优势等级的自动化方法的可靠性。
Primates. 2021 Jul;62(4):595-607. doi: 10.1007/s10329-021-00909-7. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
Automatic testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groups.对群居狒狒认知能力的自动测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):396-404. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.396.
9
Age effect in expert cognitive flexibility in Guinea baboons (Papio papio).老年效应对食蟹猕猴(Papio papio)专家认知灵活性的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2022 Sep 26;434:114043. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114043. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
10
A practical guide for inferring reliable dominance hierarchies and estimating their uncertainty.推断可靠的统治等级结构及其不确定性的实用指南。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 May;87(3):594-608. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12776. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive flexibility and sociality in Guinea baboons (Papio papio).几内亚狒狒(豚尾狒狒)的认知灵活性与社会性
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0308778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308778. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-term tracking of social structure in groups of rats.长期追踪大鼠群体中的社会结构。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72437-5.
3
Is this worth the trouble? Strategic conflict management in Tonkean macaques.这值得费这个麻烦吗?豚尾猕猴的策略性冲突管理。

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic detection of feeding- and drinking-related agonistic behavior and dominance in dairy cows.自动检测奶牛的摄食和饮水相关的争食行为和优势等级。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):9176-9186. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16697. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
An autonomous, automated and mobile device to concurrently assess several cognitive functions in group-living non-human primates.一种用于同时评估群居非人类灵长类动物多种认知功能的自主、自动化移动设备。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Nov;145:45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Other better versus self better in baboons: an evolutionary approach of social comparison.
iScience. 2023 Oct 11;26(11):108176. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108176. eCollection 2023 Nov 17.
4
Guinea baboons are strategic cooperators.豚尾狒是有策略的合作者。
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 27;9(43):eadi5282. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi5282.
狒狒中其他更好与自身更好的比较:社会比较的一种进化方法。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 31;284(1855). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0248.
4
An automated system for positive reinforcement training of group-housed macaque monkeys at breeding and research facilities.一种用于繁殖和研究设施中群居猕猴正强化训练的自动化系统。
J Neurosci Methods. 2017 Jun 15;285:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 1.
5
Charting the neglected West: The social system of Guinea baboons.探索被忽视的西部:几内亚狒狒的社会系统。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Jan;162 Suppl 63(Suppl Suppl 63):15-31. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23144.
6
Sex differences in inhibitory control in socially-housed baboons (Papio papio).群居狒狒(豚尾狒狒)抑制控制中的性别差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Oct 1;312:231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.032. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
Taking the Operant Paradigm into the Field: Associative Learning in Wild Great Tits.将操作性范式应用于野外:野生大山雀的联想学习
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0133821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133821. eCollection 2015.
8
GROUP DECISIONS. Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons.群体决策。共同决策推动野生狒狒的集体行动。
Science. 2015 Jun 19;348(6241):1358-61. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5099.
9
Baboons' response speed is biased by their moods.狒狒的反应速度受其情绪影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 25;9(7):e102562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102562. eCollection 2014.
10
The ALDB box: automatic testing of cognitive performance in groups of aviary-housed pigeons.ALDB 框:对养在鸟舍中的一组鸽子进行认知性能的自动测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):162-71. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0462-2.