Alharbi Khalid Khalaf, Alshammary Amal F, Aljabri Omar Sammar, Ali Khan Imran
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Mar 1;14:895-900. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S294948. eCollection 2021.
Limited studies have shown positive and negative associations of serum amylase A1 () gene in childhood obesity, previously showed the relation with obesity in different ethnicity. The current study therefore investigated the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms present in the gene on subjects of Saudi obesity.
In this case-control study, we selected 140 subjects of Saudi population and categorized them into 83 cases of obesity and 57 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed with quantitative/real time-polymerase chain reaction in the gene for rs11603089A/G, rs4638289A/T and rs7131332A/G polymorphisms.
In rs11603089 polymorphism, co-dominant model (AG vs AA+GG; OR-2.23 [95% CI:1.02-4.86]; p=0.04) and rs4638289 polymorphism, a disparity in significance was observed between the homozygous variant (TT vs AA; OR-16.8 [95% CI: 2.06-136.8]; p=0.0009), dominant model (AT+TT vs AA; OR-2.57 [95% CI: 1.28-5.19]; p=0.007), recessive model (TT vs AA+AT; OR-11.36 [95% CI: 1.45-89.06]; p=0.004) and allelic frequency for (T vs A: OR-2.35 [95% CI: 1.39-3.98]; p=0.001) between the obesity cases and control subjects. However, statistical correlations did not reveal the rs7131332A/G polymorphism either (p>0.05).
In conclusion, rs4638289 polymorphism was associated with risk allele and dominant model with obesity subjects. Further additional studies were warranted.
此前有限的研究表明血清淀粉酶A1()基因与儿童肥胖存在正相关和负相关,且显示了该基因在不同种族中与肥胖的关系。因此,本研究调查了该基因中存在的单核苷酸多态性对沙特肥胖受试者的影响。
在这项病例对照研究中,我们选取了140名沙特人群受试者,并将他们分为83例肥胖病例和57名健康对照。对该基因中的rs11603089A/G、rs4638289A/T和rs7131332A/G多态性进行定量/实时聚合酶链反应基因分型。
在rs11603089多态性中,共显性模型(AG与AA + GG相比;OR - 2.23 [95% CI:1.02 - 4.86];p = 0.04)以及rs4638289多态性中,在肥胖病例与对照受试者之间,纯合变异(TT与AA相比;OR - 16.8 [95% CI:2.06 - 136.8];p = 0.0009)、显性模型(AT + TT与AA相比;OR - 2.57 [95% CI:1.28 - 5.19];p = 0.007)、隐性模型(TT与AA + AT相比;OR - 11.36 [95% CI:1.45 - 89.06];p = 0.004)以及等位基因频率(T与A相比:OR - 2.35 [95% CI:1.39 - 3.98];p = 0.001)方面观察到显著差异。然而,统计相关性也未显示rs7131332A/G多态性存在差异(p > 0.05)。
总之,rs4638289多态性与肥胖受试者的风险等位基因和显性模型相关。需要进一步开展更多研究。