Centre for Chemicals Application Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China.
Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Application Techniques in Plant Protection, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 10;777:146181. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146181. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Under the rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) plant protection products (PPP) application in Asian countries, the drift risk of UAV sprayer operation in orchard or vineyard is fairly high because of the much finer droplets generated and the higher height than ground sprayers, increasing threats to non-targeted crop, human and environment. However, there is few of comprehensive experimental study on the effects of UAV type and nozzle type on spray deposition and drift from UAV sprayer. The objectives of this study were to compare the spray performance of three different typical commercial UAV types (helicopter, 6-rotor and 8-rotor) with two nozzles types (hollow cone nozzle, HCN and air-injector flat fan nozzle, AIN) in vineyard. An artificial vineyard and three vertical collection frames, designed and built by ourselves, were applied for collecting droplets together with PVC collectors, petri dishes and rotary samples. The characteristics of deposition, drift and mass balance of UAV aerial spraying in vineyard were analyzed. As a result, under the crosswind speed of 3.11-3.79 m/s, AIN promoted spray deposition and uniformity and reduced drift significantly compared to HCN for all tested UAVs, improving of the utilization of PPP. The fitted regression functions of the sedimenting and airborne drift were obtained, respectively, and the drift percentage reduction values of AIN compared to HCN determined based on those functions varied from 81% to 95%. With HCN, 49.3%-73.4% of measured droplets drifted into non-targeted area and the highest proportion of drift loss was found for the airborne spray drift. According to the principle of more deposition and less drift, the spray performance of the three UAVs can be ranked in an order of 6-rotor, 8-rotor and helicopter, and two main reasons causing the difference in spray performance were the vortex airflow and the nozzle arrangement.
在无人飞行器(UAV)植保产品(PPP)在亚洲国家的快速发展下,由于产生的雾滴更加细微且作业高度高于地面喷雾器,果园或葡萄园中 UAV 喷雾器的漂移风险相当高,这对非目标作物、人类和环境构成了更大的威胁。然而,目前关于 UAV 类型和喷嘴类型对 UAV 喷雾器喷雾沉积和漂移的影响的综合实验研究较少。本研究的目的是比较三种不同典型商业 UAV 类型(直升机、6 旋翼和 8 旋翼)与两种喷嘴类型(空心锥形喷嘴、HCN 和空气射流扁平扇形喷嘴、AIN)在葡萄园中的喷雾性能。我们自行设计和建造了一个人工葡萄园和三个垂直收集架,与 PVC 收集器、培养皿和旋转样品一起收集雾滴。分析了葡萄园 UAV 空中喷雾的沉积、漂移和质量平衡特性。结果表明,在横风速为 3.11-3.79 m/s 下,AIN 与 HCN 相比,所有测试的 UAV 均能显著提高喷雾沉积率和均匀性,减少漂移,提高 PPP 的利用率。分别获得了沉降和空气漂移的拟合回归函数,并根据这些函数确定了 AIN 与 HCN 相比的漂移减少百分比值在 81%-95%之间。使用 HCN 时,49.3%-73.4%的测量雾滴漂移到非目标区域,空气漂移中发现的漂移损失比例最高。根据沉积更多、漂移更少的原则,三种 UAV 的喷雾性能可按 6 旋翼、8 旋翼和直升机的顺序排列,造成喷雾性能差异的两个主要原因是涡流气流和喷嘴布置。