• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于中国 COVID-19 的谣言反驳讨论中的回音室效应:社交媒体内容和网络分析研究。

Echo Chamber Effect in Rumor Rebuttal Discussions About COVID-19 in China: Social Media Content and Network Analysis Study.

机构信息

School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):e27009. doi: 10.2196/27009.

DOI:10.2196/27009
PMID:33690145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7996199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dissemination of rumor rebuttal content on social media is vital for rumor control and disease containment during public health crises. Previous research on the effectiveness of rumor rebuttal, to a certain extent, ignored or simplified the structure of dissemination networks and users' cognition as well as decision-making and interaction behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to roughly evaluate the effectiveness of rumor rebuttal; dig deeply into the attitude-based echo chamber effect on users' responses to rumor rebuttal under multiple topics on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, in the early stage of the COVID-19 epidemic; and evaluate the echo chamber's impact on the information characteristics of user interaction content.

METHODS

We used Sina Weibo's application programming interface to crawl rumor rebuttal content related to COVID-19 from 10 AM on January 23, 2020, to midnight on April 8, 2020. Using content analysis, sentiment analysis, social network analysis, and statistical analysis, we first analyzed whether and to what extent there was an echo chamber effect on the shaping of individuals' attitudes when retweeting or commenting on others' tweets. Then, we tested the heterogeneity of attitude distribution within communities and the homophily of interactions between communities. Based on the results at user and community levels, we made comprehensive judgments. Finally, we examined users' interaction content from three dimensions-sentiment expression, information seeking and sharing, and civility-to test the impact of the echo chamber effect.

RESULTS

Our results indicated that the retweeting mechanism played an essential role in promoting polarization, and the commenting mechanism played a role in consensus building. Our results showed that there might not be a significant echo chamber effect on community interactions and verified that, compared to like-minded interactions, cross-cutting interactions contained significantly more negative sentiment, information seeking and sharing, and incivility. We found that online users' information-seeking behavior was accompanied by incivility, and information-sharing behavior was accompanied by more negative sentiment, which was often accompanied by incivility.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed the existence and degree of an echo chamber effect from multiple dimensions, such as topic, interaction mechanism, and interaction level, and its impact on interaction content. Based on these findings, we provide several suggestions for preventing or alleviating group polarization to achieve better rumor rebuttal.

摘要

背景

在公共卫生危机期间,社交媒体上谣言驳斥内容的传播对于谣言控制和疾病遏制至关重要。之前关于谣言驳斥效果的研究,在一定程度上忽略或简化了传播网络的结构以及用户的认知、决策和互动行为。

目的

本研究旨在粗略评估谣言驳斥的效果;深入挖掘在微博(中国社交媒体平台)上 COVID-19 疫情早期针对多个主题的谣言驳斥下,基于态度的回音壁效应对用户回应的影响;并评估回音壁对用户互动内容信息特征的影响。

方法

我们使用新浪微博的应用程序接口,从 2020 年 1 月 23 日上午 10 点到 2020 年 4 月 8 日午夜,抓取与 COVID-19 相关的谣言驳斥内容。使用内容分析、情感分析、社会网络分析和统计分析,我们首先分析在转发或评论他人推文时,基于态度的回音壁效应对个人态度形成的影响,以及在多大程度上产生影响。然后,我们测试了社区内态度分布的异质性以及社区间互动的同质性。基于用户和社区层面的结果,我们做出了全面的判断。最后,我们从情感表达、信息寻求与分享以及文明性三个维度检验用户的互动内容,以检验回音壁效应的影响。

结果

我们的结果表明,转发机制在促进极化方面发挥了重要作用,而评论机制则在达成共识方面发挥了作用。我们的结果表明,社区互动中可能没有显著的回音壁效应,并且验证了与志同道合的互动相比,交叉互动包含了更多的负面情绪、信息寻求与分享以及不文明行为。我们发现,在线用户的信息寻求行为伴随着不文明行为,而信息分享行为伴随着更多的负面情绪,且往往伴随着不文明行为。

结论

我们的研究结果揭示了从多个维度(如主题、互动机制和互动层面)存在和程度的回音壁效应,及其对互动内容的影响。基于这些发现,我们为防止或减轻群体极化以实现更好的谣言驳斥提供了几点建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/20ec012e07a5/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/d8090d274800/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/3192e40cfb25/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/64bace3a5135/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/f973d7acf9bb/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/82687e940428/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/5be2836b7a67/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/35f143ba4fd4/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/aa2f696fd1d1/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/5a58f552ff7d/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/67a180168a99/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/9e46fdf7650b/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/3e04d56e0918/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/20ec012e07a5/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/d8090d274800/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/3192e40cfb25/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/64bace3a5135/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/f973d7acf9bb/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/82687e940428/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/5be2836b7a67/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/35f143ba4fd4/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/aa2f696fd1d1/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/5a58f552ff7d/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/67a180168a99/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/9e46fdf7650b/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/3e04d56e0918/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3053/7996199/20ec012e07a5/jmir_v23i3e27009_fig13.jpg

相似文献

1
Echo Chamber Effect in Rumor Rebuttal Discussions About COVID-19 in China: Social Media Content and Network Analysis Study.关于中国 COVID-19 的谣言反驳讨论中的回音室效应:社交媒体内容和网络分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):e27009. doi: 10.2196/27009.
2
The echo chamber effect of rumor rebuttal behavior of users in the early stage of COVID-19 epidemic in China.中国新冠疫情早期用户谣言反驳行为的回音室效应
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107088. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107088. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
Opinion Leaders and Structural Hole Spanners Influencing Echo Chambers in Discussions About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media in China: Network Analysis.社交媒体上关于新冠疫苗讨论中的意见领袖和结构洞破坏者对信息茧房的影响:网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 18;24(11):e40701. doi: 10.2196/40701.
4
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
5
The impact factors of social media users' forwarding behavior of COVID-19 vaccine topic: Based on empirical analysis of Chinese Weibo users.社交媒体用户转发新冠疫苗话题的影响因素:基于中国微博用户的实证分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;10:871722. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.871722. eCollection 2022.
6
Difference in Rumor Dissemination and Debunking Before and After the Relaxation of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in China: Infodemiology Study.中国放松新冠疫情防控措施前后的谣言传播和辟谣差异:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e48564. doi: 10.2196/48564.
7
Characterizing Weibo Social Media Posts From Wuhan, China During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Content Analysis.描述中国武汉 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段微博社交媒体帖子的特征:定性内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):e24125. doi: 10.2196/24125.
8
Dissemination and Refutation of Rumors During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Infodemiology Study.新冠疫情期间中国谣言的传播与驳斥:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 15;23(2):e22427. doi: 10.2196/22427.
9
Sentiment Analysis of Texts on Public Health Emergencies Based on Social Media Data Mining.基于社交媒体数据挖掘的突发公共卫生事件文本情感分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3964473. doi: 10.1155/2022/3964473. eCollection 2022.
10
Public Discourse and Sentiment Toward Dementia on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning Analysis of Weibo Posts.中文社交媒体中公众对痴呆症的话语和情绪:微博帖子的机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(9):e39805. doi: 10.2196/39805.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Promotional Strategies to Enhance Hospital Influence on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Study.利用促销策略提升医院在社交媒体上的影响力:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 22;27:e70676. doi: 10.2196/70676.
2
Behavioural interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy driven by misinformation on social media.减少社交媒体上错误信息导致的疫苗犹豫的行为干预措施。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 16;384:e076542. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076542.
3
Exploring rumor behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic through an information processing perspective: The moderating role of critical thinking.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Emotions and Rumors Spread During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: Web-Based Correlation Study.中国新冠肺炎疫情期间公众情绪与谣言传播:基于网络的相关性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e21933. doi: 10.2196/21933.
2
An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.中国 COVID-19 疫情前 50 天的传播控制措施调查。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):638-642. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation.
从信息处理视角探索新冠疫情期间的谣言传播行为:批判性思维的调节作用
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Oct;147:107842. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107842. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
4
Does Social Media Users' Interaction Influence the Formation of Echo Chambers? Social Network Analysis Based on Vaccine Video Comments on YouTube.社交媒体用户的互动是否会影响回音室的形成?基于 YouTube 疫苗视频评论的社交网络分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315869.
5
Opinion Leaders and Structural Hole Spanners Influencing Echo Chambers in Discussions About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media in China: Network Analysis.社交媒体上关于新冠疫苗讨论中的意见领袖和结构洞破坏者对信息茧房的影响:网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 18;24(11):e40701. doi: 10.2196/40701.
6
COVID-19: The Pseudo-Environment and the Need for a Paradigm Change.新冠病毒肺炎:拟态环境与范式转变的必要性
Germs. 2021 Dec 29;11(4):468-477. doi: 10.18683/germs.2021.1283. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability.新冠疫情期间影响虚假新闻反驳接受度的因素及认知能力的调节作用。
Comput Human Behav. 2022 May;130:107174. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
8
The Influence of the Debunker's Identity and Emotional Expression on the Sharing Behavior of Debunking Information.辟谣者身份和情感表达对辟谣信息分享行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 6;12:783415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783415. eCollection 2021.
封锁新冠病毒相关信息会助长错误信息的传播。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7803):306. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00920-w.
4
COVID-19: fighting panic with information.新冠疫情:用信息对抗恐慌。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30379-2.
5
Defining the Epidemiology of Covid-19 - Studies Needed.定义新冠病毒病的流行病学——所需的研究。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1194-1196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2002125. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.一场引发全球卫生关注的新型冠状病毒疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
A model and simulation of the emotional contagion of netizens in the process of rumor refutation.网民在谣言驳斥过程中的情绪感染模型与模拟。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50770-4.
8
Debunking in a world of tribes.在部落化的世界中破除谬误。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821. eCollection 2017.
9
Tweeting Supertyphoon Haiyan: Evolving Functions of Twitter during and after a Disaster Event.推特上的超级台风海燕:灾难事件期间及之后推特功能的演变
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0150190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150190. eCollection 2016.
10
Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threads.通过查看对话线程来分析人们在社交媒体中如何传播和对待谣言。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0150989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150989. eCollection 2016.