• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辟谣者身份和情感表达对辟谣信息分享行为的影响。

The Influence of the Debunker's Identity and Emotional Expression on the Sharing Behavior of Debunking Information.

作者信息

Chao Fan, Wang Xin, Yu Guang

机构信息

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 6;12:783415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783415. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783415
PMID:34938245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8685251/
Abstract

Owing to the proliferation of rumors on social media, it is necessary to disseminate debunking information to minimize the harm caused by them. Using content analysis, sentiment analysis, and regression analysis, this study examined the mediating role of follower count in the relationship between the debunker's identity and sharing behavior, and it explored the relationship between the text sentiment of debunking information and sharing behavior based on data on the spread of three rumors that circulated extensively on social media. Using an ordinary account as a reference, we found that the mediating or suppression effect (i.e., when direct and indirect effects are significant and opposite) of follower count in the relationship between debunker's identity (celebrity, media, or government) and sharing behavior was significant. The three test identities (celebrity, media, and government) had more followers than the ordinary account, which resulted in a significant positive effect on the number of reposts. The debunker's identity did not have a positive effect on the sharing of debunking information when controlling for mediating variables. Debunking information with emotional overtones (positive or negative) was shared more widely compared with information with neutral emotions, and the dominant emotional polarity was different in the three different rumors. These findings can contribute to the generation of debunking information content, which can aid in the development of effective communication strategies and improvement in the efficiency of crisis management.

摘要

由于社交媒体上谣言的泛滥,有必要传播辟谣信息以尽量减少其造成的危害。本研究运用内容分析、情感分析和回归分析,基于在社交媒体上广泛传播的三条谣言传播数据,考察了粉丝数量在辟谣者身份与分享行为之间关系中的中介作用,并探讨了辟谣信息的文本情感与分享行为之间的关系。以普通账号为参照,我们发现粉丝数量在辟谣者身份(名人、媒体或政府)与分享行为之间关系中的中介或抑制效应(即直接效应和间接效应显著且相反时)显著。三个测试身份(名人、媒体和政府)的粉丝数量均多于普通账号,这对转发数量产生了显著的正向影响。在控制中介变量时,辟谣者身份对辟谣信息的分享没有正向影响。与中性情感的信息相比,带有情感色彩(积极或消极)的辟谣信息分享得更广泛,且在三条不同谣言中占主导的情感极性有所不同。这些发现有助于生成辟谣信息内容,有助于制定有效的传播策略并提高危机管理效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1979/8685251/0503ae0317c3/fpsyg-12-783415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1979/8685251/0503ae0317c3/fpsyg-12-783415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1979/8685251/0503ae0317c3/fpsyg-12-783415-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of the Debunker's Identity and Emotional Expression on the Sharing Behavior of Debunking Information.辟谣者身份和情感表达对辟谣信息分享行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 6;12:783415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783415. eCollection 2021.
2
Difference in Rumor Dissemination and Debunking Before and After the Relaxation of COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in China: Infodemiology Study.中国放松新冠疫情防控措施前后的谣言传播和辟谣差异:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e48564. doi: 10.2196/48564.
3
Evaluating Rumor Debunking Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: Utilizing User Stance in Comments on Sina Weibo.评估新冠疫情期间谣言破解的有效性:利用新浪微博评论中的用户立场。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:770111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.770111. eCollection 2021.
4
Hot Topic Recognition of Health Rumors Based on Anti-Rumor Articles on the WeChat Official Account Platform: Topic Modeling.基于微信公众号反谣言文章的健康谣言热点话题识别:主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e45019. doi: 10.2196/45019.
5
Health-Related Rumor Control through Social Collaboration Models: Lessons from Cases in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.通过社会协作模式进行健康相关谣言管控:新冠疫情期间中国案例的经验教训
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;10(8):1475. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081475.
6
Sentiment Analysis of Rumor Spread Amid COVID-19: Based on Weibo Text.新冠疫情期间谣言传播的情感分析:基于微博文本
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;9(10):1275. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101275.
7
The evolution of moral belief: support for the debunker's causal premise.道德信仰的演变:对拆穿者因果前提的支持。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2022 Jun 1;44(2):23. doi: 10.1007/s40656-022-00505-y.
8
Analyzing debunking arguments in moral psychology: Beyond the counterfactual analysis of influence by irrelevant factors.剖析道德心理学中的揭穿论证:超越对无关因素影响的反事实分析。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 11;42:e151. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002716.
9
Survival analysis of the duration of rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间谣言持续时间的生存分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17991-3.
10
Understanding Rumor Sharing Behavior During COVID-19: The Dominant Motivation and the Potential Consequences for Life Satisfaction.理解 COVID-19 期间的谣言分享行为:主导动机及其对生活满意度的潜在影响。
J Psychol. 2023;157(5):339-366. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2023.2206605. Epub 2023 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks.重新审视在线社交网络中道德传染的证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;5(12):1629-1635. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01133-5. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
Echo Chamber Effect in Rumor Rebuttal Discussions About COVID-19 in China: Social Media Content and Network Analysis Study.
关于中国 COVID-19 的谣言反驳讨论中的回音室效应:社交媒体内容和网络分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):e27009. doi: 10.2196/27009.
4
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.依赖情感会促进对假新闻的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
5
Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.评估信息生态系统规模下的假新闻问题。
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 3;6(14):eaay3539. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3539. eCollection 2020 Apr.
6
Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation.冠状病毒:错误信息的传播。
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 18;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3.
7
Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer.双缝光电电子干涉在氖二聚体的强场电离中。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8.
8
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
9
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Debunking in a world of tribes.在部落化的世界中破除谬误。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181821. eCollection 2017.