Suppr超能文献

“全面改革医疗保险,或许还能对我们进行更好的培训”:一项关于初级保健全科医生对如何实施腰痛临床护理标准看法的定性研究

'Overhaul Medicare and perhaps train us better': a qualitative study of primary care general practitioners' perspectives on how to implement the low back pain clinical care standards.

作者信息

Costa Nathalia, Lin Chung-Wei Christine, Blyth Fiona, Huckel-Schneider Carmen, Buchbinder Rachelle, Gnjidic Danijela, Langford Aili, O'Connor Denise, Schneider Carl, French Simon

机构信息

The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland Clinical Trials Capability (ULTRA) Team, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics and Data, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Public Health. 2025 Sep 8;3(2):e002564. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002564. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In September 2022, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare released the Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standards ('Care Standard'). We aimed to explore general practitioners' (GPs') perspectives on how the Care Standard can be implemented, with a view to identifying what strategies could be used to do so.

METHODS

This qualitative study is underpinned by a critical realist philosophy. We interviewed 16 GPs across Australia with experience working with patients who present with low back pain (LBP). Interview questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, and interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified three themes: theme 1-'I have my own guidelines and ways of doing things'-guidelines and standards are not relevant for experienced GPs' captures the perceived unnecessariness of seeking advice from guidelines and standards for LBP; theme 2-I agree with the standards but the system, clinicians and patients hinder my ability to enact them-reports factors impacting the will and ability of clinicians to implement the standards in practice; theme 3-Change the system and train us better-discusses potential strategies to implement the Care Standard: changing funding and infrastructure (eg, improving GPs' reimbursement for time spent, investing in publicly funded allied health services); offering training and education (eg, continuing professional development courses, improving communication training in undergraduate courses), developing stakeholder relationships (eg, primary health networks, Health Pathways), supporting clinicians through interactive assistance (eg, reminders, embedding assessment tools in existing systems), engaging/educating patients and using evaluative strategies such as auditing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the multidimensional nature of the challenges GPs face, and the strategies they suggest, calls for a multimodal and integrated approach to implementing the Care Standards, including system changes.

摘要

引言

2022年9月,澳大利亚医疗保健安全与质量委员会发布了《腰痛临床护理标准》(《护理标准》)。我们旨在探讨全科医生(GPs)对于如何实施《护理标准》的看法,以便确定可用于实施该标准的策略。

方法

本定性研究以批判实在论哲学为基础。我们采访了澳大利亚各地16名有治疗腰痛(LBP)患者经验的全科医生。访谈问题基于理论领域框架,并使用反思性主题分析法对访谈数据进行了分析。

结果

我们确定了三个主题:主题1——“我有自己的指导方针和做事方式”——指导方针和标准对经验丰富的全科医生无关紧要,这反映了人们认为寻求腰痛指导方针和标准的建议没有必要;主题2——我同意这些标准,但系统、临床医生和患者阻碍了我实施这些标准的能力,报告了影响临床医生在实践中实施标准的意愿和能力的因素;主题3——改变系统并更好地培训我们,讨论了实施《护理标准》的潜在策略:改变资金和基础设施(例如,提高全科医生的时间报销费用,投资公共资助的联合健康服务);提供培训和教育(例如,继续职业发展课程,改善本科课程中的沟通培训),发展利益相关者关系(例如,初级卫生网络、健康路径),通过互动协助支持临床医生(例如,提醒,将评估工具嵌入现有系统),让患者参与/接受教育,并使用审计等评估策略。

结论

我们的结果表明,全科医生面临的挑战具有多维度性质,以及他们建议的策略,这需要一种多模式和综合的方法来实施《护理标准》,包括系统变革。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验