Maton K I
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland Baltimore County 21228.
Am J Community Psychol. 1988 Feb;16(1):53-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00906072.
This study examined the relationship of three social support and three organizational variables to two well-being and two group appraisal variables among 144 members of Compassionate Friends, Multiple Sclerosis, and Overeaters Anonymous self-help groups. An anonymous questionnaire was the major research instrument. Receiving social support was not significantly related to depression or anxiety but was positively related to perceived group benefits and group satisfaction. Providing social support and friendship were each positively related to one well-being and one group appraisal variable. Bidirectional supporters (i.e., individuals high on both receiving and providing support) reported more favorable well-being and group appraisal than Receivers, Providers, and Low Supporters. At the group level of analysis (n = 15 groups), groups with higher levels of role differentiation, greater order and organization, and in which leaders were perceived as more capable contained members who reported more positive well-being and group appraisal. The implications for future research and professional consultation to self-help groups are discussed.
本研究考察了三种社会支持和三种组织变量与“悲友互助会”“多发性硬化症互助会”以及“匿名戒酒互助会”等自助团体中144名成员的两种幸福感变量和两种团体评价变量之间的关系。一份匿名问卷是主要的研究工具。获得社会支持与抑郁或焦虑无显著关联,但与感知到的团体益处和团体满意度呈正相关。提供社会支持和友谊分别与一种幸福感变量和一种团体评价变量呈正相关。双向支持者(即既善于获得支持又善于提供支持的个体)报告的幸福感和团体评价比单纯的接受者、提供者以及低水平支持者更积极。在团体层面进行分析时(n = 15个团体),角色分化程度更高、秩序和组织性更强且领导者被认为更有能力的团体,其成员报告的幸福感和团体评价更积极。文中还讨论了对未来研究和针对自助团体的专业咨询的启示。