Suppr超能文献

差异察觉任务:一种新的非言语测谎行为的指标。

The Difference Spotting Task: A new nonverbal measure of cheating behavior.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1935-1944. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01526-w. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

Abstract

To understand when, how, and why people cheat, the ability to detect cheating in a laboratory setting is crucial. However, commonly used paradigms are confronted with a conflict between allowing participants to believe they can cheat unnoticed and allowing experimenters to detect cheating. This project aimed to develop and establish a new nonverbal task to resolve this conflict. Study 1 and Study 2 developed a new unsolvable paradigm called the Difference Spotting Task. In Study 1, participants were incentivized to indicate whether they found any difference between a pair of pictures without being asked to point the difference(s) out, so they could overreport their performance to earn extra money. Unbeknownst to them, the pairs of pictures from half of the items were identical so that the task could not be solved without cheating. This paradigm allowed experimenters to detect cheating for each unsolvable item. Study 3 examined the validity of the Difference Spotting Task and demonstrated it as a valid tool to assess cheating. The Difference Spotting Task is nonverbal and thus applicable to populations across age, educational level, and culture. In this unsolvable task, participants feel safe in cheating, and experimenters can detect cheating at the item level. The task holds the potential to gain acceptance by many researchers and facilitate the investigation of the underlying processes of cheating behavior.

摘要

为了理解人们何时、如何以及为何会作弊,在实验室环境中检测作弊的能力至关重要。然而,常用的范式面临着一个冲突,即既要让参与者相信他们可以在不被察觉的情况下作弊,又要让实验者能够检测到作弊。本项目旨在开发和建立一种新的非言语任务来解决这一冲突。研究 1 和研究 2 开发了一种新的无法解决的范式,称为差异发现任务。在研究 1 中,参与者被激励去指出一对图片之间是否有任何差异,而无需被要求指出差异,这样他们就可以虚报成绩来赚取额外的钱。他们不知道的是,一半项目的图片是相同的,因此如果不作弊,任务就无法解决。这个范式允许实验者检测到每个无法解决的项目中的作弊行为。研究 3 检验了差异发现任务的有效性,并证明它是一种评估作弊的有效工具。差异发现任务是一种非言语任务,因此适用于不同年龄、教育水平和文化背景的人群。在这个无法解决的任务中,参与者感到作弊是安全的,而实验者可以在项目层面上检测到作弊。该任务有可能被许多研究人员接受,并促进对作弊行为的潜在过程的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验