• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策的经济因素:评估临床项目

Economic aspects of clinical decision making: evaluating clinical programs.

作者信息

Hepler C D

机构信息

Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Mar;45(3):554-60.

PMID:3369458
Abstract

The importance of program evaluation is discussed, and issues to consider when designing and conducting program evaluations in the restructuring health-care environment are identified. Program evaluation is carried out for the purpose of supporting specific decisions for individual organizations. Unlike scientific research, program evaluation accepts time as a constraint, and its audience is composed of managers. Considering the likelihood of being fixed-dollar contractors or employees in an era of managed care, professionals must try to understand the cost objectives of management; similarly, managers must understand the patient-care objectives of professionals. Program evaluation can help provide the necessary documentation of a program's impact on the outcome of health care, which influences the total cost of care. Successful program evaluation requires careful planning, and issues related to six steps in the planning process are described: defining the objective of the evaluation, choosing and defining the program to be evaluated, choosing indicator variables, designing the evaluation, presenting the results, and planning follow-through. While program evaluation is too often understood in negative terms, particularly as something done because of external pressure, it is as much a part of management as is directing day-to-day operations or developing a long-range plan.

摘要

本文讨论了项目评估的重要性,并确定了在重组医疗保健环境中设计和开展项目评估时需要考虑的问题。开展项目评估的目的是为个别组织的特定决策提供支持。与科学研究不同,项目评估将时间视为一种限制因素,其受众是管理人员。考虑到在管理式医疗时代成为固定费用承包商或雇员的可能性,专业人员必须努力理解管理的成本目标;同样,管理人员也必须理解专业人员的患者护理目标。项目评估有助于提供有关项目对医疗保健结果影响的必要文件,这会影响护理的总成本。成功的项目评估需要精心规划,并描述了与规划过程中六个步骤相关的问题:确定评估目标、选择并界定要评估的项目、选择指标变量、设计评估、呈现结果以及规划后续跟进。虽然项目评估常常被从负面角度理解,尤其是将其视为因外部压力而进行的事情,但它与日常运营管理或制定长期计划一样,都是管理的一部分。

相似文献

1
Economic aspects of clinical decision making: evaluating clinical programs.临床决策的经济因素:评估临床项目
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Mar;45(3):554-60.
2
Economic aspects of clinical decision making: new perspectives.临床决策的经济层面:新视角
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Mar;45(3):540-2.
3
Economic aspects of clinical decision making: applications of clinical decision analysis.临床决策的经济层面:临床决策分析的应用
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Mar;45(3):548-53.
4
Integrating telemedicine and telehealth: putting it all together.整合远程医疗与远程健康:将一切整合起来。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:23-38.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Evaluation of placement and coordination of geriatric services using a health program evaluation grid.使用健康项目评估网格对老年服务的布局与协调进行评估。
Clin Geriatr Med. 1986 Feb;2(1):137-50.
7
Disease management in healthcare organizations: results of in-depth interviews with disease management decision makers.医疗保健机构中的疾病管理:对疾病管理决策者的深度访谈结果
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jul;8(7):633-41.
8
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
9
Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.经济评估在英格兰地方医疗保健决策中的应用:一项定性研究。
Health Policy. 2009 Mar;89(3):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
10
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.