1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Apr;51(2):261-264. doi: 10.1177/0020731421999930. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
The coronavirus pandemic has shed light on the detrimental impact of neoliberal policies on public health and well-being and as a result, there have been calls for increases in public spending to rectify the lack of public health services. However, neoliberal right-wing parties have dismissed such calls, pointing instead to Asian countries as examples in successfully controlling the pandemic without high public health spending, attributing this to the entrepreneurial orientation of their governments, as opposed to their public services. This article refutes this idea, instead charting the reasons that Asian countries have better controlled the pandemic including prior experience of pandemics, cultural factors, and various successful public health policies. The article concludes by looking at the example of Trump and demonstrating the inadequacies of the business model for dealing with the coronavirus pandemic.
冠状病毒大流行揭示了新自由主义政策对公共卫生和福祉的不利影响,因此有人呼吁增加公共支出,以纠正公共卫生服务的不足。然而,新自由主义右翼政党驳斥了这些呼吁,而是指出亚洲国家在没有高额公共卫生支出的情况下成功控制疫情,这是因为其政府具有创业导向,而不是公共服务。本文驳斥了这一观点,而是阐述了亚洲国家更好地控制疫情的原因,包括先前的大流行经验、文化因素和各种成功的公共卫生政策。文章最后以特朗普为例,说明了商业模型在应对冠状病毒大流行方面的不足。