• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Public health services in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and practices in selected European neighbouring countries].[新冠疫情期间的公共卫生服务:部分欧洲邻国的策略与实践]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Apr;64(4):472-480. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03295-z. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Leveraging epidemiological principles to evaluate Sweden's COVID-19 response.利用流行病学原理评估瑞典的 COVID-19 应对措施。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;54:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
Unconventional Answers to Unprecedented Challenges: The Swedish Experience During the COVID-19 Outbreak.应对前所未有的挑战的非常规答案:新冠疫情期间的瑞典经验
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020 Jul;53(4):233-235. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.235. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
COVID-19 Testing in Sweden During 2020-Split Responsibilities and Multi-Level Challenges.2020 年瑞典的 COVID-19 检测:职责划分与多层次挑战。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:754861. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.754861. eCollection 2021.
5
Public health, surveillance policies and actions to prevent community spread of COVID-19 in Denmark, Serbia and Sweden.丹麦、塞尔维亚和瑞典的公共卫生、监测政策和行动,以预防 COVID-19 在社区的传播。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Aug;50(6):711-729. doi: 10.1177/14034948211056215. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Why Asian Countries are Controlling the Pandemic Better Than the United States and Western Europe.为什么亚洲国家比美国和西欧控制疫情更好。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Apr;51(2):261-264. doi: 10.1177/0020731421999930. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Positioning Digital Tracing Applications in the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in France.定位数字追踪应用在法国 COVID-19 大流行管理中的作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(10):e27301. doi: 10.2196/27301.
8
COVID-19 pandemic, government responses, and public mental health: Investigating consequences through crisis hotline calls in two countries.COVID-19 大流行、政府应对措施和公众心理健康:通过两个国家的危机热线电话调查后果。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113532. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113532. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
9
Pandemic preparedness systems and diverging COVID-19 responses within similar public health regimes: a comparative study of expert perceptions of pandemic response in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.大流行防范系统与类似公共卫生体系中 COVID-19 应对措施的差异:对丹麦、挪威和瑞典大流行应对专家看法的比较研究。
Global Health. 2022 Jan 21;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00799-4.
10
Effect of heat and humidity on the incidence and mortality due to COVID-19 pandemic in European countries.热湿对欧洲国家 COVID-19 大流行发病率和死亡率的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Sep;24(17):9216-9225. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202009_22874.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Workloads and Resilience of Heads of Municipal Public Health Authorities in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perceptions of Operational Organization, Communication, and Measures.新冠疫情期间德国市级公共卫生机构负责人的心理社会工作量和韧性:对运营组织、沟通和措施的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 26;21(11):1421. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111421.
2
[Mapping as an Iterative Visualization Process: Insights into Regional Care Structures in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic].[作为迭代可视化过程的映射:对SARS-CoV-2大流行中区域护理结构的洞察]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Dec;84(12):1174-1181. doi: 10.1055/a-1876-2481. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
The Containment Scouts: First Insights into an Initiative to Increase the Public Health Workforce for Contact Tracing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.《遏制侦察兵:在德国 COVID-19 大流行期间,接触者追踪公共卫生人员队伍扩充计划的初步洞察》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 3;18(17):9325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179325.

本文引用的文献

1
Case report and systematic review suggest that children may experience similar long-term effects to adults after clinical COVID-19.病例报告和系统评价表明,儿童在临床感染 COVID-19 后可能会经历与成年人相似的长期影响。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Mar;110(3):914-921. doi: 10.1111/apa.15673. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Swedish policy analysis for Covid-19.瑞典针对新冠疫情的政策分析。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):598-612. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
The COVID-19 pandemic and the Swedish strategy: Epidemiology and postmodernism.新冠疫情与瑞典策略:流行病学与后现代主义
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Aug 8;11:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100643. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
France: Health System Review.法国:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(3):1-218, xvii.

[新冠疫情期间的公共卫生服务:部分欧洲邻国的策略与实践]

[Public health services in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and practices in selected European neighbouring countries].

作者信息

Gerlinger Thomas, Schmidt Phillip Florian, Lückenbach Caspar

机构信息

Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Arbeitsgruppe "Gesundheitssysteme, Gesundheitspolitik, Gesundheitssoziologie", Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 10 01 31, 33501, Bielefeld, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Apr;64(4):472-480. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03295-z. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-021-03295-z
PMID:33748867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7982271/
Abstract

The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic face different institutional structures and traditions of action in the European health systems. This article uses the example of the public health services in Sweden, France and Austria to address the question of the similarities and differences in the measures taken to combat the pandemic (status: November 2020).Among the countries presented in this article, Austria is the least affected by the pandemic and France is the most affected. In all analysed health systems there is a tension between national and regional responsibilities. France's healthcare system is particularly centralized, while Sweden's is strongly regional and municipal. Governments in the nation states are striving to obtain pandemic containment powers independent of parliamentary decisions. Sweden differs from Austria and France in that its pandemic containment strategy is based primarily on recommendations and appeals rather than directives and bans. The sequences of action during the pandemic and, apart from Sweden, the instruments used to contain the pandemic are similar. The course of the pandemic and the measures taken in Austria and France show clear parallels with those in Germany. The protection of particularly vulnerable groups has not been sufficiently successful in all countries and remains a challenge to be met.

摘要

新冠疫情带来的挑战在欧洲卫生系统中面临着不同的制度结构和行动传统。本文以瑞典、法国和奥地利的公共卫生服务为例,探讨应对疫情所采取措施的异同(状态:2020年11月)。在本文介绍的国家中,奥地利受疫情影响最小,法国受影响最大。在所有分析的卫生系统中,国家和地区责任之间都存在紧张关系。法国的医疗保健系统特别集中,而瑞典的则高度分散到地区和市政层面。民族国家的政府正在努力获得独立于议会决定的疫情防控权力。瑞典与奥地利和法国的不同之处在于,其疫情防控战略主要基于建议和呼吁,而非指令和禁令。疫情期间的行动顺序,以及除瑞典外用于遏制疫情的手段都是相似的。奥地利和法国的疫情发展过程及采取的措施与德国的情况明显相似。在所有国家,对特别弱势群体的保护都不够成功,仍然是一项有待应对的挑战。