Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina e Saúde da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Curso de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 1;101(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab092.
Exercise is a recommended component of care for people living with HIV/AIDS; however, it is unclear which type of exercise is most effective. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative effects of different types of exercise interventions on aerobic capacity measured by peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population.
For this systematic review and indirect-comparisons meta-analysis (network meta-analysis), different electronic databases were searched up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on peak VO2 and HRQoL of people living with HIV/AIDS. Mean differences, standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% CI were calculated. Fixed- and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis were used to compare the relative effectiveness of the different exercise interventions.
Forty studies met the study criteria, reporting on a total of 1518 patients. When comparing the exercise interventions with usual care (control group) for the peak VO2 outcome, combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the highest ranked exercise intervention with an SMD of 4.2 (95% CI = 2.5 to 5.9), followed by aerobic exercise (SMD = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.4 to 5.1). Compared with aerobic exercise, resistance training, and yoga, combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the best exercise intervention to promote improvement on physical function, general health, mental health, and energy/vitality domains HRQoL.
The combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the highest ranked exercise intervention to improve peak VO2 and HRQoL. Combined aerobic and resistance exercise should be considered as a component of care for people living with HIV/AIDS.
运动是艾滋病病毒/艾滋病患者护理的推荐组成部分;然而,哪种运动最有效尚不清楚。本研究旨在调查不同类型的运动干预对该人群有氧能力(最大摄氧量峰值,peak VO2)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的相对影响。
为了进行这项系统评价和间接比较荟萃分析(网络荟萃分析),从多个电子数据库检索了截至 2020 年 2 月的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了不同类型的运动干预对艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者 peak VO2 和 HRQoL 的影响。计算了均值差异、标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间。采用固定效应和随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较了不同运动干预的相对有效性。
40 项研究符合研究标准,共报告了 1518 例患者。在比较运动干预与常规护理(对照组)对 peak VO2 结果时,有氧和抗阻运动相结合的运动干预是排名最高的运动干预,SMD 为 4.2(95%CI 2.5 至 5.9),其次是有氧运动(SMD 3.1;95%CI 1.4 至 5.1)。与有氧运动、抗阻训练和瑜伽相比,有氧和抗阻运动相结合的运动干预是改善身体功能、一般健康、心理健康和精力/活力领域 HRQoL 的最佳运动干预。
有氧和抗阻运动相结合的运动干预是提高 peak VO2 和 HRQoL 的最高排名运动干预。有氧和抗阻运动相结合的运动干预应该被认为是艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者护理的一部分。