From the Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Saúde, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Cardiol Rev. 2024;32(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000447. Epub 2022 May 26.
Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it is unclear which type of physical rehabilitation exercise is most effective. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the relative effects of different types of exercise interventions on aerobic capacity measured by peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak; in mL/kg·min) in patients with HFpEF. We searched different electronic databases until December 2020 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on VO 2 peak of patients with HFpEF. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fixed and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to compare the relative effectiveness of the different exercise interventions. Nineteen studies met the study criteria, including 720 patients. Comparing the physical rehabilitation interventions with usual care (control group), inspiratory muscle training was the highest ranked exercise intervention with an SMD of 3.6 mL/kg·min (95% CI, 2.3-4.8), followed by the group undergoing high-intensity interval training with a significant pooled improvement in VO 2 peak 3.5 (95% CI, 2.6-4.4) and combined aerobic and resistance exercise with an SMD of 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4-5.0). The inspiratory muscle training, high-intensity interval training, and combined aerobic and resistance exercise were the highest ranked physical rehabilitation intervention to improve VO 2 peak. These interventions should be considered as a component in the care of patients with HFpEF. Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; Unique identifier: CRD42021256442.
运动是射血分数保留心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者康复护理的重要组成部分。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种类型的身体康复运动最有效。因此,本研究旨在确定不同类型的运动干预对 HFpEF 患者峰值摄氧量(VO 2 peak;以 mL/kg·min 计)的相对影响。我们在不同的电子数据库中搜索了截至 2020 年 12 月评估不同类型运动干预对 HFpEF 患者 VO 2 peak 影响的随机对照试验。计算了均值差、标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。采用固定效应和随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较了不同运动干预的相对有效性。19 项研究符合研究标准,共纳入 720 例患者。与常规护理(对照组)相比,吸气肌训练是排名最高的运动干预措施,SMD 为 3.6 mL/kg·min(95%CI,2.3-4.8),其次是高强度间歇训练组,VO 2 peak 有显著的汇总改善,SMD 为 3.5(95%CI,2.6-4.4),有氧和抗阻运动联合治疗组的 SMD 为 3.2(95%CI,1.4-5.0)。吸气肌训练、高强度间歇训练和有氧和抗阻运动联合治疗是改善 VO 2 peak 的排名最高的身体康复干预措施。这些干预措施应被视为 HFpEF 患者护理的一部分。注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/;唯一标识符:CRD42021256442。