• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代理优先偏好与视觉事件表示的对齐:德语和阿拉伯语的对比。

The Alignment of Agent-First Preferences with Visual Event Representations: Contrasting German and Arabic.

机构信息

Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Herbert-Lewin-Str. 10, Cologne, 50931, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Aug;50(4):843-861. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09750-3. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-020-09750-3
PMID:33704632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8282564/
Abstract

How does non-linguistic, visual experience affect language production? A series of experiments addressed this question by examining linguistic and visual preferences for agent positions in transitive action scenarios. In Experiment 1, 30 native German speakers described event scenes where agents were positioned either to the right or to the left of patients. Produced utterances had longer speech onset times for scenes with right- rather than left-positioned agents, suggesting that the visual organization of events can affect sentence production. In Experiment 2 another cohort of 36 native German participants indicated their aesthetic preference for left- or right-positioned agents in mirrored scenes and displayed a preference for scenes with left-positioned agents. In Experiment 3, 37 Arabic native participants performed the same non-verbal task showing the reverse preference. Our findings demonstrate that non-linguistic visual preferences seem to affect sentence production, which in turn may rely on the writing system of a specific language.

摘要

非语言的视觉体验如何影响语言产生?一系列实验通过检查及物动作场景中语言和视觉对施事者位置的偏好来解决这个问题。在实验 1 中,30 名以德语为母语的参与者描述了施事者位于患者左侧或右侧的事件场景。与施事者位于左侧的场景相比,施事者位于右侧的场景产生的言语起始时间更长,这表明事件的视觉组织可以影响句子的产生。在实验 2 中,另一组 36 名以德语为母语的参与者在镜像场景中表示他们对左侧或右侧施事者位置的审美偏好,并表现出对左侧施事者位置的场景的偏好。在实验 3 中,37 名阿拉伯语母语参与者执行了相同的非言语任务,表现出相反的偏好。我们的发现表明,非语言的视觉偏好似乎会影响句子的产生,而句子的产生可能依赖于特定语言的书写系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/f63a7b9df9b3/10936_2020_9750_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/34192e1d0d71/10936_2020_9750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/2a64f4d47eed/10936_2020_9750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/1c8dc6be8a26/10936_2020_9750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/f63a7b9df9b3/10936_2020_9750_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/34192e1d0d71/10936_2020_9750_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/2a64f4d47eed/10936_2020_9750_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/1c8dc6be8a26/10936_2020_9750_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f0a/8282564/f63a7b9df9b3/10936_2020_9750_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Alignment of Agent-First Preferences with Visual Event Representations: Contrasting German and Arabic.代理优先偏好与视觉事件表示的对齐:德语和阿拉伯语的对比。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Aug;50(4):843-861. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09750-3. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Describing Events: Changes in Eye Movements and Language Production Due to Visual and Conceptual Properties of Scenes.描述事件:由于场景的视觉和概念属性导致的眼动和语言产生的变化。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 17;10:835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00835. eCollection 2019.
3
Writing direction and language activation affect how Arabic-English bilingual speakers map time onto space.书写方向和语言激活会影响阿拉伯语-英语双语者如何将时间映射到空间上。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 24;14:1356039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1356039. eCollection 2023.
4
Predicting stuttering from linguistic factors for German speakers in two age groups.基于语言因素预测两个年龄组德语使用者的口吃情况。
J Fluency Disord. 2003 Summer;28(2):95-112; quiz 112-3. doi: 10.1016/s0094-730x(03)00009-3.
5
Literacy overrides effects of animacy: A picture-naming study with pre-literate German children and adult speakers of German and Arabic.文字能力优于生物性:使用未识字的德国儿童以及德语和阿拉伯语母语者进行的图片命名研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0298659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298659. eCollection 2024.
6
Twenty-four or four-and-twenty: Language modulates cross-modal matching for multidigit numbers in children and adults.二十四或二十四:语言调节儿童和成人对多位数字的跨模态匹配。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Feb;202:104970. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104970. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
How right hemisphere damage after stroke can impair speech comprehension.脑卒中后右脑损伤如何损害言语理解能力。
Brain. 2018 Dec 1;141(12):3389-3404. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy270.
8
New Space-Time Metaphors Foster New Nonlinguistic Representations.新的时空隐喻催生新的非语言表征。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):800-818. doi: 10.1111/tops.12279. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
Determinants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production.视觉情境句子生成中结构选择的决定因素。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):304-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
10
Did you get the beat? Late proficient French-German learners extract strong-weak patterns in tonal but not in linguistic sequences.你掌握节奏了吗?晚期熟练的法德双语学习者在旋律而非语言序列中提取重轻模式。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.062. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking.书写方向影响过去时态和将来时态形式的空间表征:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1079-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01633-5. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Literacy overrides effects of animacy: A picture-naming study with pre-literate German children and adult speakers of German and Arabic.文字能力优于生物性:使用未识字的德国儿童以及德语和阿拉伯语母语者进行的图片命名研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0298659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298659. eCollection 2024.
3
Spatial metaphors and the design of everyday things.

本文引用的文献

1
Literacy shapes thought: the case of event representation in different cultures.读写能力塑造思维:不同文化中事件表现的案例。
Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 16;5:290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00290. eCollection 2014.
2
What drives the spatial agency bias? An Italian-Malagasy-Arabic comparison study.是什么导致了空间能动性偏差?一项意大利 - 马达加斯加 - 阿拉伯语比较研究。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):991-6. doi: 10.1037/a0034989. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task.
空间隐喻与日常用品设计
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:1019957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1019957. eCollection 2022.
跨文化的时间心理表象差异:来自内隐非言语任务的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;34(8):1430-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x.
4
Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses.眼球运动与相对物从句加工难度。
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
5
Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.基础英语语法结构的频率:语料库分析
J Mem Lang. 2007 Oct 1;57(3):348-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002.
6
On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation.关于事件理解与话语表述之间的相互作用。
J Mem Lang. 2007 Nov;57(4):544-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.007.
7
How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions: a developmental, cross-linguistic study.书写系统和年龄如何影响动作的空间表征:一项发展性的跨语言研究。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):487-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01926.x.
8
Describing scenes hardly seen.描绘罕见场景。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jun;125(2):129-43. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
Orthographic directionality and thematic role illustration in English and Arabic.英语和阿拉伯语中的正字法方向性与题元角色说明
Brain Lang. 2006 Jun;97(3):306-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
10
Lateral biases in aesthetic preferences: pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms.审美偏好中的侧向偏差:图像维度与神经机制。
Laterality. 1997;2(2):155-75. doi: 10.1080/713754266.