• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基础英语语法结构的频率:语料库分析

Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

作者信息

Roland Douglas, Dick Frederic, Elman Jeffrey L

机构信息

University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2007 Oct 1;57(3):348-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
PMID:19668599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2722756/
Abstract

Many recent models of language comprehension have stressed the role of distributional frequencies in determining the relative accessibility or ease of processing associated with a particular lexical item or sentence structure. However, there exist relatively few comprehensive analyses of structural frequencies, and little consideration has been given to the appropriateness of using any particular set of corpus frequencies in modeling human language. We provide a comprehensive set of structural frequencies for a variety of written and spoken corpora, focusing on structures that have played a critical role in debates on normal psycholinguistics, aphasia, and child language acquisition, and compare our results with those from several recent papers to illustrate the implications and limitations of using corpus data in psycholinguistic research.

摘要

最近许多语言理解模型都强调了分布频率在确定与特定词汇项或句子结构相关的相对可及性或处理难易程度方面的作用。然而,对结构频率的全面分析相对较少,而且在将任何特定的语料库频率集用于人类语言建模时,很少有人考虑其适用性。我们为各种书面和口语语料库提供了一套全面的结构频率,重点关注在关于正常心理语言学、失语症和儿童语言习得的辩论中起关键作用的结构,并将我们的结果与最近几篇论文的结果进行比较,以说明在心理语言学研究中使用语料库数据的意义和局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/6f75ab557db5/nihms30776f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/eab20f8369db/nihms30776f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/362353ea3da3/nihms30776f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/05b217fc741a/nihms30776f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/362bdf8eb662/nihms30776f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/16301697d4b6/nihms30776f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/cce97f230a9f/nihms30776f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/42a40b5a2926/nihms30776f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/62de0c269116/nihms30776f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/56d2143c4399/nihms30776f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/2471ca3316c4/nihms30776f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/40009993ce45/nihms30776f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/9b54678c8ab5/nihms30776f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/6f75ab557db5/nihms30776f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/eab20f8369db/nihms30776f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/362353ea3da3/nihms30776f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/05b217fc741a/nihms30776f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/362bdf8eb662/nihms30776f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/16301697d4b6/nihms30776f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/cce97f230a9f/nihms30776f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/42a40b5a2926/nihms30776f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/62de0c269116/nihms30776f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/56d2143c4399/nihms30776f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/2471ca3316c4/nihms30776f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/40009993ce45/nihms30776f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/9b54678c8ab5/nihms30776f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f9c/2722756/6f75ab557db5/nihms30776f13.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.基础英语语法结构的频率:语料库分析
J Mem Lang. 2007 Oct 1;57(3):348-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002.
2
The nature and frequency of relative clauses in the language children hear and the language children read: A developmental cross-corpus analysis of English complex grammar.儿童所听语言和所读语言中关系从句的性质与频率:英语复杂语法的发展性跨语料库分析
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar 7:1-26. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000957.
3
Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage-Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing.思考多词结构:基于用法的习得与处理方法
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):604-620. doi: 10.1111/tops.12256. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
4
Bilinguals Show Weaker Lexical Access During Spoken Sentence Comprehension.双语者在口语句子理解过程中表现出较弱的词汇提取能力。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Dec;44(6):789-802. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9322-6.
5
Early grammar-building in French-speaking deaf children with cochlear implants: A follow-up corpus study.植入人工耳蜗的法语失聪儿童的早期语法构建:一项后续语料库研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1204-1222. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12854. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.句法距离和语序对语言处理的影响:基于英语心理语言学树库的研究
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):1043-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Language learning as language use: A cross-linguistic model of child language development.语言学习即语言使用:儿童语言发展的跨语言模型。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):1-51. doi: 10.1037/rev0000126.
8
Direct object pronoun sentence processing in Spanish-English children with/without Specific Language Impairment and adults: A cross-modal priming study.有/无特定语言障碍的西班牙裔-英语儿童及成人对直接宾语代词句子的处理:一项跨模态启动研究。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Mar-Apr;72:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Methodologies for assessing morphosyntactic ability in people with Alzheimer's disease.评估阿尔茨海默病患者形态句法能力的方法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):38-57. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12862. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
10
The impact of lexical frequency on sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment.词汇频率对特定语言障碍儿童句子理解的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Feb;35(2):472-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sentence Production in Standard Indonesian Agrammatism.标准印尼语语法缺失症中的句子生成
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Sep 3;54(5):54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-025-10165-1.
2
An ERP study on verb bias and thematic role assignment in standard Indonesian.一项关于标准印尼语中动词偏向和题元角色分配的事件相关电位研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 7;15(1):11847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96240-y.
3
Semantic cues facilitate structural generalizations in artificial language learning.语义线索有助于人工语言学习中的结构归纳。

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora.理解与产出缩减关系结构:来自评级、编辑及语料库的证据
J Mem Lang. 2007 Apr;56(3):410-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.007.
2
Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.为什么会这样?在一个非常大的英语句子语料库中的结构预测和歧义消解。
Cognition. 2006 Jan;98(3):245-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.008.
3
Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian "who"-questions: a study with event-related potentials.
Lang Learn Dev. 2024;20(4):364-379. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2024.2342873. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
4
How semantics works in Chinese relative clause processing: insights from eye tracking.语义在中国关系从句加工中如何起作用:来自眼动追踪的见解
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 19;15:1294132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294132. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of individual differences in text exposure on sentence comprehension.文本暴露的个体差异对句子理解的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 5;13(1):16812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43801-8.
6
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Dynamic Updating of Native Language.母语动态更新背后的神经机制。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020 Nov 1;1(4):492-522. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00023. eCollection 2020.
7
Structural Priming and Inverse Preference Effects in L2 Grammaticality Judgment and Production of English Relative Clauses.二语语法性判断及英语关系从句产出中的结构启动与反向偏好效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 22;13:845691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845691. eCollection 2022.
8
Change is hard: Individual differences in children's lexical processing and executive functions after a shift in dimensions.改变是困难的:维度转变后儿童词汇加工与执行功能的个体差异
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(2):229-247. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1947289. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Modulation in alpha band activity reflects syntax composition: an MEG study of minimal syntactic binding.alpha 频段活动的调制反映了句法构成:最小句法绑定的 MEG 研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jan 5;33(3):497-511. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac080.
10
L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.二语学习者在实时句法处理中不会忽略动词的次范畴化信息。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:689137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689137. eCollection 2021.
意大利语“who”问句中临时句法歧义的处理:一项事件相关电位研究
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Mar 29;377(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.074. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
4
Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):432-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03195591.
5
The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development.希伯来语中关系从句理解的习得:一项关于特定语言障碍和正常语言发展的研究。
J Child Lang. 2004 Aug;31(3):661-81. doi: 10.1017/s0305000904006269.
6
The development of complex sentence interpretation in typically developing children compared with children with specific language impairments or early unilateral focal lesions.与患有特定语言障碍或早期单侧局灶性病变的儿童相比,正常发育儿童复杂句子解释能力的发展情况。
Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):360-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00353.x.
7
The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.合理性对阅读中眼动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1290-301. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290.
8
Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.句子理解中的句子复杂性和输入方式效应:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.001.
9
Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints.口语理解中从声音到意义的连续映射:基于动词的主题限制的即时效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):498-513. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.498.
10
The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: evidence from on-line anomaly detection.失语症中填充语-间隙依存关系的消解与恢复:来自在线异常检测的证据
Brain Lang. 2004 Jan;88(1):108-27. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00283-9.