Center for Developmental Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Autism Res. 2021 Jul;14(7):1404-1420. doi: 10.1002/aur.2490. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Difficulties in automatic emotion processing in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) might remain concealed in behavioral studies due to compensatory strategies. To gain more insight in the mechanisms underlying facial emotion recognition, we recorded eye tracking and facial mimicry data of 20 school-aged boys with ASD and 20 matched typically developing controls while performing an explicit emotion recognition task. Proportional looking times to specific face regions (eyes, nose, and mouth) and face exploration dynamics were analyzed. In addition, facial mimicry was assessed. Boys with ASD and controls were equally capable to recognize expressions and did not differ in proportional looking times, and number and duration of fixations. Yet, specific facial expressions elicited particular gaze patterns, especially within the control group. Both groups showed similar face scanning dynamics, although boys with ASD demonstrated smaller saccadic amplitudes. Regarding the facial mimicry, we found no emotion specific facial responses and no group differences in the responses to the displayed facial expressions. Our results indicate that boys with and without ASD employ similar eye gaze strategies to recognize facial expressions. Smaller saccadic amplitudes in boys with ASD might indicate a less exploratory face processing strategy. Yet, this slightly more persistent visual scanning behavior in boys with ASD does not imply less efficient emotion information processing, given the similar behavioral performance. Results on the facial mimicry data indicate similar facial responses to emotional faces in boys with and without ASD. LAY SUMMARY: We investigated (i) whether boys with and without autism apply different face exploration strategies when recognizing facial expressions and (ii) whether they mimic the displayed facial expression to a similar extent. We found that boys with and without ASD recognize facial expressions equally well, and that both groups show similar facial reactions to the displayed facial emotions. Yet, boys with ASD visually explored the faces slightly less than the boys without ASD.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体在自动情绪处理方面的困难可能由于补偿策略而在行为研究中被掩盖。为了更深入地了解面部情绪识别的机制,我们记录了 20 名学龄期 ASD 男孩和 20 名匹配的正常发育对照者在执行明确的情绪识别任务时的眼动跟踪和面部模仿数据。分析了特定面部区域(眼睛、鼻子和嘴巴)的比例注视时间和面部探索动态。此外,还评估了面部模仿。ASD 男孩和对照组都能够识别表情,且在比例注视时间、注视次数和注视持续时间上没有差异。然而,特定的面部表情会引起特定的注视模式,尤其是在对照组中。两组都表现出相似的面部扫描动态,尽管 ASD 男孩的眼跳幅度较小。关于面部模仿,我们没有发现特定于情绪的面部反应,也没有发现对照组对显示的面部表情的反应存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,患有和不患有 ASD 的男孩使用相似的眼动注视策略来识别面部表情。ASD 男孩的眼跳幅度较小可能表明他们的面部处理策略不那么具有探索性。然而,鉴于相似的行为表现,ASD 男孩的这种稍微更持久的视觉扫描行为并不意味着他们的情绪信息处理效率较低。关于面部模仿数据的结果表明,患有和不患有 ASD 的男孩对情绪面部表现出相似的面部反应。